Posted on

AbraPlata Resources – An Undervalued, Well-financed Silver Company with a Portfolio of JV Ready Projects

AbraPlata Resources

In the first half of 2019, most of the questions I received from readers involved the gold price and where I thought it was headed. Now, 8 months later and with the gold price surpassing US$1500/oz, the focus of the questions has shifted to the other precious metal – silver.

Silver is often referred to as gold on steroids, as historically it has outperformed gold both to the upside and downside depending on the direction of the market.  Today, the silver price has eclipsed US$18.50/oz and, at this rate, may even surpass US$20/oz by the end of 2019.

The factors driving the silver price are closely related to those driving gold, mainly the FED lowering interest rates, the talk of further QE, negative interest in Europe, the turmoil surrounding the U.S. and China trade war, and the ever-increasing list of financial calamities around the world.

Additionally, silver has a component of industrial use, which I think is the added driver of its volatility.

The rising silver price has brought with it a large amount of speculative cash which is flowing into many of the junior silver companies. Reviewing my watch list, many of these companies are up by huge amounts, mostly for no reason other than they offer perceived leverage to the silver price.

It’s the classic buying of junior resource companies because of a bullish outlook for a metal. This mentality in the junior resource sector, while it may bring short-term gains, will ultimately lose money for investors over the long term.

Junior resource companies are speculations on management’s ability to execute on a well thought out plan, which aligns with their overall vision for the company. If people can’t execute, it doesn’t matter where the metal price goes, the metal will either not be discovered or developed into a mine – period.

Today, I have for you a company which is led by good management, has roughly $3 million in cash, a high potential flagship asset – Diablillos – which has an existing M&I resource with around 140 Moz of silver equivalent, a portfolio of Chilean projects ready for JV, and a great plan to bring value to shareholders.

This company is the newly proposed AbraPlata Resources, which is expected to announce a definitive agreement regarding a merger with Aethon Minerals very soon.

Let’s take a closer look.

Merger – Aethon Minerals and AbraPlata Resources

Earlier this year, Aethon announced that they had struck a deal which would give them the exclusive right to perform technical due diligence, over a 5 month period, on AbraPlata Resource’s Diablillos silver-gold project in Argentina.

For this exclusive right, Aethon paid AbraPlata US$50,000 and agreed to spend at least US$150,000 on expenditures in connection with a metallurgical testing program and other related test work.  At the end of the 5 month period, Aethon could then acquire a 50% or greater interest in the project.

Five months later, Aethon and AbraPlata announced that they had agreed in principle to a merger of the two companies, creating a new junior with a great flagship asset in Diablillos, a portfolio of JV ready projects in Chile, and around $3 million in cash.

Additionally, I think it’s important to point out that the merger signals that the money Aethon spent on testing the deposit’s metallurgy must have returned good results or this merger wouldn’t be happening. A HUGE plus for both sets of shareholders, because it’s one thing to own a deposit, but without the economic ability to liberate and concentrate the mineral, it’s worthless!

NOTE: In accordance with the merger agreement, AbraPlata will issue 3.75 shares for every share of Aethon. At the time of writing, there is an arbitrage opportunity in owning Aethon shares, which are selling at a discount to the deal.

I fully expect to see the announcement of a definitive agreement in the coming days, and would expect the transaction to close before the end of the year. 

Aethon Minerals (AET:TSXV)

MCAP – $6.3 million (at the time of writing)

Share Price – $0.23

Shares – 27.6 million

FD – 46.3 million

AbraPlata Resources (ABRA:TSXV)

MCAP – $6.7 million (at the time of writing)

Share Price – $0.075

Shares – 96.7 million

FD – 131.5 million

People

In early 2018, Altius Minerals spun out a portfolio of its Chilean projects into Aethon Minerals. For those who don’t know, Altius is focused on the mining and resource sector through prospect generation, and the creation and acquisition of royalties and investments.

Over the course of my investing career, I have learned that to make money consistently, it’s of the utmost importance to identify and invest in the best people. I believe it’s a given that Altius has a keen interest in the success of the newly formed AbraPlata Resources and, therefore, with the appointment of Aethon’s interim CEO as its leader, John Miniotis, I believe it speaks volumes about his abilities and future in the mining business.

AbraPlata will be Miniotis’ first crack at being a CEO, but he certainly isn’t a newbie to the industry, as he has over 14 years of experience, previously working at AuRico Metals, Lundin Mining and Barrick Gold, as well as roles in equity research with BMO Capital Markets and Wellington West Capital Markets.

Miniotis is technically supported by Chief Geologist, David O’Connor, who is currently based out of Chile. O’Connor is a veteran of the industry with over 40 years of experience, founding or co-founding 5 publically listed companies, discovering the El Espino deposit in Chile, leading early exploration for Western Mining Corp. at the Olympic Dam deposit, and Chief geologist of Peko-Wallsend in Australia.

Additionally, with the merger of the two companies, a new Board of Directors will be announced. Right now, we know that current AbraPlata interim CEO and Director, Rob Bruggeman, will become the Chairman and the remaining seats will be broken down as follows: two directors nominated by AbraPlata, two directors nominated by Aethon, one director by SSR Mining and one director nominated by Altius Minerals.

This should prove to be very good for the new company, as this should ensure that there will be good representation on the board with people who have creditable mining experience in Argentina and, most importantly, in-depth knowledge of their flagship Diablillos Silver-Gold Project.

With the support of Altius and the financial backing of Sprott Asset Management, who is also a major shareholder, the newly formed AbraPlata has all it needs to be a success in the future.

Diablillos Silver-Gold Project

  • 2018 PEA: After-tax NPV@7.5% – US$212 million, After-tax IRR of 30.2% at US1300/oz gold and US$20/oz silver.
    • 6,000 tpd open pit mining operation, producing 9.8 Moz AgEq per year
    • Open pit estimated initial CAPEX US$293 million, includes US$91 of pre-stripping cost
  • 2017 Historical Resource – 140 Moz @ 161 g/t Ag Eq or 1.7 Moz @ 2.0 g/t  Au Eq at spot prices
  • Aethon successfully completed, pre-merger, extensive testing of the Oculto deposit’s metallurgy, ensuring that the PEA results are representative of the entire deposit, not just a specific zone.
  • SSR Mining is the original vendor of the project and supports the transaction and has agreed to delay property payments of US$5 million and US$7 million by four years (see March 1st press release). I expect further detail of the payments to SSR to be given at the time of the announcement of the definitive agreement regarding the merger.

Last week, I discussed the potential of the Oculto deposit expansion with Miniotis and O’Connor. O’Connor highlighted some of the high grade core associated with breccias zones, where high grades have been intercepted over broad widths in historical drilling.

Interestingly, reviewing some of the historical results, you can see that these intercepts have some really good high grade hits.  A few of the highlights are: 98.5m of 861 g/t silver and 3.98 g/t gold, 27.7m of 2,192 g/t silver and 0.45 g/t gold and 54m of 2,292 g/t silver and 0.46 g/t gold.

This is especially great because, in our discussion, Miniotis brought up the possibility of changing the mine plan from open pit to an underground operation, which has the potential to dramatically drop the initial CAPEX cost needed to bring Diablillos to production.

Upon completion of the merger, priority number one for AbraPlata will be to establish continuity between these intercepts, at a drill spacing where they can be added to an updated resource calculation. Miniotis expects the drill program will cost roughly $1 million, making it easily affordable with their cash position.

The second priority will be to explore some of the satellite breccia deposits, which sit within 1 to 2 km of Oculto and could be potentially mined in a future production scenario.

In my opinion, there’s a clear path to improving the NPV of Diablillos in a big way and, most advantageous, is investors really don’t have to wait that long to get an idea of how much better the project economics will be.

Chilean Project Portfolio

The newly formed AbraPlata will own 100% of a large prospective land package, totalling over 100,000 ha in northern Chile. The land package includes the Arcas Copper-Gold Project, Maricunga Gold Project and the Peineta Gold-Silver Project, which all sit in close proximity to some of the most prospective ground in South America.

Each project is ready for JV with a partner and I fully expect to hear news of a new partnership before the end of the year.  The prospect generator model is great way to mitigate risk in the mining industry, and for a company like AbraPlata, who has a focus on their flagship Diablillos, any JV partnership is like icing on the cake, as the partner is on the hook for the exploration funding.

Currently, this aspect of the company has been overlooked by the market, but I expect that to change quickly in the weeks ahead.

Chile and Argentina

Jurisdictional risk is everywhere; no matter where you look, there’s always a chance that your money will be lost due to some country or region’s political calamity.

In saying this, I do think that certain countries come with a higher probability of an investor realizing a loss in their investment due to their chaotic state.

The newly formed AbraPlata Resources has projects in Chile and Argentina, two countries which, besides sharing a border, are very different in terms of their perceived mining investment risk profile. Currently, Chile is considered one of the best places for mining investment; the Fraser Institute which ranks countries in terms of their mining investment attractiveness gave Chile a score of 84.90, placing it 6th in the world.

Given this, I don’t think that we have to go into much detail about the merits of Chile and why I believe it’s as good as it comes in terms of mining jurisdictions.

While Chile ranks very high, Argentina on the other hand has been riddled with issues over the last 20 years, from 2001’s $100 billion sovereign debt default, to the controversial two term presidency of Christine Fernandez de Kirchner from 2007 to 2015.

Here’s a brief summary of some of the most contested issues during her reign:

  • Heavy government spending in social programs by both Nestor Kirchner (President 2003 to 2007) and his wife, Christine (President 2007 to 2015).
  • In 2012, Argentina’s congress nationalized Repsol’s (a Spanish oil company) portion in the national energy company, YPF. Kirchner defended the move by stating, “it failed to boost oil and natural gas production needed to keep up with local demand” (Reuters).
  • Nationalized private pension funds, known as “Las Administradoras de Fondos de Jubilaciones y Pensiones (AFJP)” (Wiki).
  • Kirchner fostered relationships with China, Venezuela and Iran.
  • Nisman Allegations – Kirchner and Argentine Foreign Minister, Hector Timerman, were allegedly involved in a plot to cover up Iran’s role in the 1994 bombing of the Amia Jewish Community Centre, in which 85 people were killed. Alberto Nisman, who was investigating this bombing, made the allegations against Kirchner and Timerman.  Days after the allegations, Nisman was found dead in his apartment.
  • Raised taxes on exports, which the government later overturned, due to mass protests.

Mauricio Macri defeated Kirchner in Argentina’s 2016 Presidential election and was widely regarded as the man to turn Argentina’s economy around. While he didn’t stir up as much controversy as Kirchner, he has had his own issues trying to turn around Argentina’s economy.

Today, Argentina sits with higher levels of poverty than four years ago, a Peso which has dramatically devalued against the US dollar, and now an upcoming election which could see the return of Kirchner, albeit in a Vice President’s role to Presidential candidate, Alberto Fernandez, who just recently won the primary election, called PASO (Primarias Abietas Simultaneas y Obligatorias).

PASO allows parties that receive at least 1.5% of the vote to participate in the general election on October 27th, 2019.

Fernandez hasn’t won yet, but the results of the PASO election put a lot of doubt on Macri retaining the presidency. The possibility of Kirchner having any political influence given what happened during her past terms as President is a great glimpse into the culture of Argentina.

I have said it before, cultures take hundreds of years to change and, while they may appear to be better in the short term, rarely is it ever sustainable, as the society’s true colours will always show.

So what does this mean in terms of investment in Argentina?

First and foremost, no doubt there’s risk associated with this potential change in government leadership, as left-leaning political ideology has a long history of being bad for a country’s economics.

Given Kirchner’s history, I’m sure many investors may be concerned with the possibility of the government nationalizing the Diablillos Project. However, I think that there is very little chance of that happening at this point, because of where the project is in its development.

Bottom line, Diablillos is at least a couple of years away from this becoming a mine and, by that time, we should have a better idea of how much of a threat the Argentine government might be.

Salta Province

One other note; all of the discussion, thus far, has centred around the politics at the federal level, however, it’s arguably more important to focus on how mining is viewed within the specific Argentine province with which the project is located, as there’s a lot of variation among them.

Diablillos is located in the Salta province, which is in the northwest portion of the country. Salta has a long history with mining, with a variety of metals being mined across the province. The most famous, because of the battery metal craze, may be Salta’s lithium brine mines, which are a part of the world-famous lithium triangle.

Thus, Salta is known for being supportive of mining and have provided a framework in which permitting applications are expeditiously vetted.

Further, amongst the political turmoil at the federal level, senior mining companies such as First Quantum have continued to put money into Salta. In 2014, they acquired the Taca Taca Project for roughly $500 million; not a small amount of money.

Finally, with all things considered and you contrast the political risks against the upside potential in the newly formed AbraPlata,  I think the political risk associated with Argentina is acceptable.

Concluding Remarks

AbraPlata Resources presents an attractive investment proposition as demonstrated by its MCAP; the investor has a high potential for success versus the risk associated with the company.

Here’s a summary of AbraPlata’s upside potential:

  • Good management – supported by Altius Minerals, SSR Mining and Sprott Asset Management
  • MCAP is currently valued at roughly 10% of 2018 PEA on Diablillos
    • After-tax NPV@7.5% of US$212 million, After-tax IRR of 30.2% at US1300/oz gold and US$20/oz silver
    • Indicated Resource – 80.9 Moz @ 93.1 g/t silver and 732 koz @0.84 g/t gold
    • Potential to improve NPV through resource expansion at depth and along strike
    • Potential to drastically reduce initial CAPEX by changing the mine plan to an underground operation
  • No value given to its Chilean Project Portfolio – Arcas Copper-Gold Project, Maricunga Gold Project and Peineta Gold-Silver Project – All are JV-ready opportunities.
    • The prospect generator business model has the JV partners fund the exploration of the projects – drastically reducing the risk associated with exploration.
    • If you consider that many prospect generators, albeit with JV partners in place, have, in many cases, MCAPs of CAD$30 million alone, AbraPlata’s current value proposition is very good.
  • Roughly $3 million in cash

No investment is without risk, including an investment in AbraPlata. Given the upside potential that I see in the company, however, especially in a rising precious metals environment, I believe AbraPlata is in for a dramatic market re-rating once the merger is complete.

I’m an owner and will continue to be a buyer of AbraPlata on weakness in the weeks ahead, as they set forth on what should be an exciting fall of exploration at Diablillos.

Don’t want to miss a new investment idea, interview or financial product review? Become a Junior Stock Review VIP now – it’s FREE!

Until next time,

Brian Leni  P.Eng

Founder – Junior Stock Review

Disclaimer: The following is not an investment recommendation, it is an investment idea. I am not a certified investment professional, nor do I know you and your individual investment needs. Please perform your own due diligence to decide whether this is a company and sector that is best suited for your personal investment criteria. I have NO business relationship with any of the companies discussed in this article – Altius Minerals, Aethon Minerals, AbraPlata Resources. I do own shares in Altius Minerals and Aethon Minerals.

Posted on

Quebec Site Visit Tour Day 1 -Osisko Mining

Brian Leni

Gold continues to march its way upward, breaking US$1,500 /oz and setting all-time highs in numerous other currencies, including the Canadian and Australian dollars.  While this is music to the ears of the gold producing companies around the globe, the rest of the world is bracing for turmoil.

Tensions in Asia have hit new highs with the protests in Hong Kong appearing to escalate. Hong Kong’s airport has been shut down, and the Hong Kong people have taken to the streets waving the American flag and singing its anthem; a sight I wouldn’t have believed had I not seen the video clips.

China is not only fighting to maintain its control over Hong Kong, but continues to fight the Americans over trade. In my opinion, the longer this goes on, the worse it is for the global economy, as China remains an integral piece of the financial puzzle.

To add further complexity to the global marketplace, the U.S. Federal Reserve cut interest rates by 0.25%, signalling weakness in the U.S. economy. The currency wars continue, as they inch closer to fiats intrinsic value of 0.

While I can’t predict the ebb and flow of any commodity, I think it’s safe to say that the world is, unfortunately, ready for higher gold prices and, with it, we are most likely to see some type of climactic event which will trigger a reset for the global economy.

Now that seems like a gloomy outlook, but on the bright side, while that scenario may be inevitable, it doesn’t mean it’s imminent. Secondly, as an investor, I think you have to ask yourself, ‘how can I profit from a world which is in financial turmoil?’

First off, I should rephrase my question, as it most likely isn’t a case of how to profit, but more how to maintain what you have, given the circumstances.

Buying physical precious metals is definitely prudent and, given the attention high gold prices bring to the precious metals companies, investment in the best junior resource companies should prove to be very profitable.

In my opinion, equating future high metals prices with investment in junior companies is a recipe for inevitable failure, however, given that the majority of the market works this way, I expect to see irrationally high junior company valuations in the not-too-distant future.

Last week, I visited 3 junior gold companies that are all situated in close proximity to Val d’Or, Quebec. For those who aren’t familiar with this area, Val d’Or is famous for its historical gold production, as this eastern portion of the Abitibi Greenstone Belt has produced roughly 70 Moz of gold throughout its history.

All 3 companies appear to give the investor good risk to reward potential, in a gold market which is just starting to heat up.

Let’s take a closer look at the details of my trip.

Enjoy!

Day 1 – Osisko Mining’s Windfall Project

For all intents and purposes, the Osisko story starts back in 2004 with the acquisition of the Canadian Malartic site. Founders, John Burzynski, Sean Roosen and Robert Wares, used an innovative geological analysis model to analyze Quebec’s publicly available geological data (SIGEOM). The data revealed that the Canadian Malartic site had the potential for an open pit mining operation, which prompted the team to acquire the site.

Canadian Malartic Gold Mine
Canadian Malartic Gold Mine

Seven years after acquisition, in 2011, Canadian Malartic poured its first gold bar, and 3 years after that, it was acquired in a friendly transaction by Agnico Eagle and Yamana Gold.

Today, Osisko Mining, the company run by this mine-building team, is focused on developing the Windfall Project, which is located in the Abitibi Greenstone Belt between Val d’Or and Chibougamau in Quebec.

Windfall Project

On August 6th, via helicopter, I had the chance to visit Windfall. Here’s a breakdown of what I saw while on site and a few notes on the direction of the company as they push toward the completion of 1,000,000 metres of drilling.

Osisko Mining (OSK:TSX)

MCAP – $965.7 million (at the time of writing)

Shares – 273.2 million

Cash – $300 million in cash and cash equivalents

First, that isn’t a typo, Osisko is at or quickly approaching 1 million metres of drilling on Windfall. If their 3.5 km exploration hole, aptly named ‘Discovery 1,’is successful, there may be even more to come, as the deposit potentially just got a lot bigger.

Discovery 1 Drill Rig

3.5 km is an incredibly long hole, the longest that I have ever heard of in hard rock exploration, and I believe this is a reflection of the team which is driving the development of Osisko. Burzynski, Roosen and Wares have a vision of what Windfall could be and aren’t held back by the usual difficulties of junior resource companies – I’m mainly referring to money, here.

Osisko has raised around $400 million dollars over the last 4 years through charitable flow through financing. Charitable flow through is raised at a premium to the market share price. In Osisko’s case, the last financing was done at 1.8 times the market price.

The premium is a huge advantage for the company and its shareholders because it’s less dilutive, by almost half, than if they had to raise the cash at market prices.

Discovery 1

Why plunge the roughly $1.0 million, 3.5 km hole into the ground? There are a couple of reasons, and I believe it’s important to touch on them as they speak to the speculative upside potential in the share price.

First, in exploration drilling below the known zones, that is, at depths below 750 m, they discovered the Triple 8 zone, which hit some great intervals of gold, highlighted by 28.3 m of 20.4 g/t Au, 13.7 m of 17.4 g/t Au and 12.5 m of 6.3 g/t to list just a few.

osisko triple 8 discovery
Triple 8 Zone Discovery

Along with these high-grade gold discoveries, they also encountered andesite porphyry and garnet and biotite alteration, which is associated with high heat, ergo they might be getting closer to the intrusive heat source.

Second, discovering gold mineralization at the bottom of this 3.5 km hole will play a huge role in the layout of a future mine.  Most importantly, it would dictate if and where a shaft would be sunk to most efficiently mine the deposit.

Osisko’s geological model for the deposit is supported by the Triple 8 zone discovery and has clearly given the company’s leadership a good view of the upside potential to justify the risk of coming up with nothing.

Archean mine comparison
Archean Gold Deposits

Additionally, it should be noted that there are other examples of archean gold deposits that plunge to extremes depth, none further at the moment than Agnico Eagle’s La Ronde mine, which is currently mining at 3100 m vertically below surface.

La Ronde Gold Mine
La Ronde Gold Mine

Discovery 1 has a lot of potential; it could arguably be a game changer for the Windfall Project as there is a chance that this already large gold deposit could get much bigger. In my opinion, the only risk is the roughly $1 million it cost to drill the hole, which, to a team who seemingly is a magnet for cash, doesn’t seem like as big of a risk as it would be to most junior companies.

Bottom line, at the very least, Discovery 1 should provide Osisko’s geologists with plenty of structural data on the very deepest parts of this system and, if they are so bold, will give them a good map for another shot at the prize.

Underground at Windfall

The highlight of the entire site visit tour was going underground at Windfall. It was a first for me and something that I will never forget!

Brian Leni
Me 300 vertical meters underground

We suited up in our PPE – steel-toe boots, safety glasses, hard hat + ear muffs + head lamp, coveralls, gloves and belt, and proceeded to load up into the truck which would bring us to a depth of 300 vertical metres.

Decline at Windfall

8 of us were in the back of the truck, making it a cozy, hot trip down the ramp, which, I might add, was much steeper than I imagined when we started the journey.

Underground core drilling

Upon exiting the vehicle, however, it was well ventilated and cool at our first stop, where they happened to be core drilling. Being underground may not be for everyone. Heck, it may not be for me in any capacity except for a 20-minute tour, but I’m really glad I had the chance to do it at least once.

Underground at Windfall

Windfall PEA Highlights

After-tax NPV@5% – C$413.2 million

After-tax IRR – 32.7%

Pre-Production CAPEX – C$392.3 million

Base case at US$1300/oz Au and US$17.00/oz Ag

A PEA on Windfall was completed last summer and released to the market. Currently, Osisko is in the process of completing a Feasibility Study (FS) on Windfall and, I believe, will show a big improvement on the NPV of the project.

One of the reasons I believe there will be an improvement is as follows:

  • Removal of the triple cap on grade, which cascades from 60 g/t, to 30 g/t, to 15 g/t on certain portions of the deposit.
    • A 5500 tonne bulk sample of Windfall’s Zone 27 returned a grade of 8.53 g/t, almost 2 g/t more than the 6.76 g/t used in 2018 PEA.
  • The Triple 8 Zone was discovered roughly 750m below the surface, extending Windfall’s known mineralization much deeper than the existing resource. As mentioned earlier, not only was high-grade gold encountered, but also mineralization, which indicates proximity to the intrusive heat source for the whole system.
    • I believe a bigger gold resource, while being much deeper, will add to the overall value of the project.

Concluding Remarks

The investment case for Osisko Mining is compelling, as I have a high degree of confidence that the management team will be successful in constructing Windfall into Quebec’s next gold mine. The only questions I have are related to how much upside potential they can create leading up to a construction decision.

As I covered in this article, there are a number of factors that I think will make Windfall more economically appealing in the months ahead, but how appealing will be answered by the drill bit leading up to the end of the year.

Don’t want to miss a new investment idea, interview or financial product review? Become a Junior Stock Review VIP now – it’s FREE!

Until next time,

Brian Leni  P.Eng

Founder – Junior Stock Review

Disclaimer: The following is not an investment recommendation, it is an investment idea. I am not a certified investment professional, nor do I know you and your individual investment needs. Please perform your own due diligence to decide whether this is a company and sector that is best suited for your personal investment criteria. I have NO business relationship with Osisko Mining, nor do I currently own any shares.  However, all of my expenses for the site visit were paid for.

Posted on

Sprott Natural Resource Symposium 2019: Lessons Learned & My Notes on Some of the Exhibitors

Sprott Natural Resource Symposium 2019

Prior to the 2019 edition of the Sprott Natural Resource Symposium, I mentioned that Rick Rule’s speech on Thursday August 1st would be worth the price of admission – he didn’t disappoint!

The speech was entitled, Lessons, Re-Learned, In a Bear Market, and for good reason, as Rule covered many of the lessons that I have found so helpful over the course of my investing career.

Here’s a look at 2 lessons that, when incorporated into your investment process, in my view, will be key to your success.

  1. The sequence of answering unanswered questions leads to high returns over time.

This lesson is the basis for share price appreciation across all sectors, but is particularly important in the junior resource sector.

So, given its importance, how does one identify a company’s unanswered questions?

The unanswered questions focus on the catalysts that will drive the share price in the future, for example, the most common unanswered questions surround drill results.

Invariably, the answering of these questions leads to more unanswered questions and, thus, the process really never ends until you get a “no” answer or you have attained an acceptable amount of profit (different for everyone).

Along with identifying the unanswered questions, it’s paramount that the investor evaluate the probability of attaining a “yes” answer to each of the questions and weigh it against the potential profit.

Evaluating the probability of success is rooted in the company’s fundamentals, aspects such as who is running the company, its share structure, its cash position, the geology of the property and the jurisdiction in which the company is operating – to name just a few. 

Examples of unanswered questions:

Question – Does the mineralization extend along strike from the existing deposit?

  • If yes, how far and at what grade?

Question – Is the mineralization amenable to standard mineral processing techniques – crushing, grinding, floatation, magnetic separation?

  • If yes, are there any deleterious elements contained in the concentrate?
    • If yes, what are smelter penalties?
  • If yes, what is the metal recovery?

Share prices are driven by catalysts, and by focusing on these quantifiable answers, an investor can not only maximize his potential profit, but also minimize the effect that emotion has on their investments.

  1. When the reason to own a stock goes away, the stock needs to go away.

Lesson #2 is closely linked with lesson #1, but is particularly important in my opinion because selling a losing position can be hard to do.

The basis of this lesson is rooted in selling a stock because of receiving a “no” answer to an unanswered question. In my experience, this is very wise advice, especially in the short term, as it most often takes time for a company to reset and recover after failure.

Additionally, I think you can parlay lesson #2 a little further.

For example, you may invest in a company for specific reasons, such as its business model, the involvement of a particular person, its focus on a particular metal, or maybe it’s an interest in a particular project.

Following the mantra of lesson #2, if any of these reasons change, it’s time to sell. For example, if a project generation company whose business model centres around using “other people’s money” to explore their properties changes to using their own money to explore, you may want to think about selling, as the risk profile of the company just changed.

In my view, these lessons are invaluable and, when practiced, easily justify the price of admission to a conference such as the Sprott Natural Resource Symposium.

With that said, it will be 2020 before you know it, and with it a chance to register for next year’s conference at a significant discount if done early. Watch for the links in the New Year.

Symposium Exhibitors

One of the many perks of attending the Symposium is its list of exhibitors, each of which has been vetted by the Sprott organization and owned in a Sprott managed equity account.

While this is definitely an advantage, it doesn’t mean that investors should freely invest in any company at the conference. No matter who recommends a company, each investor is obligated, in my view, to complete their own due diligence and determine if it’s an investment which fits their own personal criteria.

I met with 10 companies that were exhibiting at the Symposium and compiled a few notes on each of them. In no particular order:

Aethon Minerals (AET:TSXV)

MCAP – $5 million (at the time of writing)

Cash – Over $3 million

  • Altius Minerals (ALS:TSX) spin out in 2018.
  • Recently announced a merger with AbraPlata, whereby all of the issued and outstanding Aethon shares will be exchanged on the basis of 3.75 AbraPlata common shares for each Aethon share. This implies consideration of $0.248 per Aethon Based on the 10-day volume weighted average of AbraPlata shares $0.661.
  • Currently, Aethon is trading at discount to AbraPlata.
  • John Miniotis will be the new company’s President and CEO.
  • Flagship asset – the Diabillos Project has a total indicated resource of 27,100 tonnes – 80.9 million oz of silver at 93.1 g/t and 732k oz of gold at 0.84 g/t and an inferred resource of 1,100 tonnes – 1.69 million oz of silver at 48.8 g/t and 29K of gold at 0.83 g/t.
  • Diabillos Project – High grade precious metal exploration potential.
  • Large Chilean land package which is slated for future joint ventures with senior mining companies. I expect to see a JV deal before the end of the year.

Hot Chili Limited (HCH:ASX)

MCAP – $44 million (at the time of writing)

Cash – Over $1 million AUD (will need to finance for Phase 2 drilling)

  • Christian Easterday is Managing Director.
  • 2 Projects: Cortadera Copper Porphyry Project and Productora Copper Project.
  • Cortadera was optioned from a private Chilean mining group, SCM Carola, earlier this year.
    • Located 14 km from Productora Copper Project.
    • Initial 5,500 m drill program was highlighted by the discovery of a new high grade zone at Cuerpo 3, the main porphyry- CRP0013D – 750 m grading 0.6% copper and 0.2 g/t gold from 204 m depth, including 188 m grading 0.9% copper and 0.4 g/t gold.
    • Exploration potential – geochemistry and geophysics (ground mag and IP) have identified a North Target area which has never been drilled.
    • Exploration potential – Additionally, each of the 4 porphyry centres remain open at depth and laterally.
    • Phase 2 drilling to commence shortly.
    • Maiden resource on Cortadera to be released very soon.
  • Productora Copper Project
    • Total Proven and Probable Reserves (JORC) – 166.9 tonnes at 0.43% copper, 0.09 g/t gold and 138 ppm molybdenum (at metal prices – Cu $3.00 USD/lbs, Au$1200 USD/oz and Mo $14.00 USD/lbs).

Altus Strategies (ALTS:TSXV)

MCAP – $16.9 million (at the time of writing)

Cash – roughly $1 million in cash and securities

  • CEO Steven Poulton leads a team of geologists and mining engineers who have a history of success in the resource industry.
  • Altus team has a long history of success in Africa.
  • Insider Ownership – CEO Steven Poulton owns 14.2%.
  • Strategic shareholders, which includes – Exploration Capital Partners (2012 and 2014) combined 13.2%, and Euro Pacific Gold Fund 3.8%.
  • 18 projects, all located in Africa, encompassing a wide range of precious and base metals.
  • Prospect generator business model.
  • Targeting greater than $10 million USD per annum JV financed exploration expenditures.
  • 9 projects in the “Joint Venture Ready” portion of their development – precious and base metals.

Millrock Resources (MRO:TSXV)

MCAP – $8.3 million (at the time of writing)

Cash – Over $2 million in cash and securities

  • Greg Beischer is President and CEO.
  • Millrock is mainly focused on mineral exploration within the Tintina Gold Province located in Alaska, but does have additional project interests in BC and Mexico.
  • Prospect generator business model.
  • No joint venture partners at the moment, however, this is likely to change in the weeks to come.
  • Currently, the Goodpaster Project is a focus for the company, as they are targeting an extension to Northern Star’s Pogo mine.
    • Using CSAMT geophysics Millrock is targeting a deep shear zone to the west of the existing mine. Key to this program is the fact that they are using the same contractor as Northern Star did to complete the work.
    • Completion of the program will either be followed by a decision to drill or wait for a JV partner to fund the drilling of the prospective target.

Mundoro Capital Inc.

MCAP – $8.67 million (at the time of writing)

Cash – $3 million (Q1-2019)

  • Teo Dechev is President and CEO.
  • Prospect Generator business model.
  • Exclusively in Eastern Europe, mainly Serbia and Bulgaria.
  • JOGMEC JV – Currently in Phase 2 program – geophysics, with drilling to follow in Q3 2019 – JOGMEC can attain 51% of the project by spending $4 million USD in expenditures by March 2019 and purchase up to 80% of the project with the delivering of a Feasibility Study.
  • Freeport JV – Currently in Phase 1 program – Alteration mapping and geophysics, with drilling to possibly follow near the end of Q4 2019 – Freeport can attain 51% of the project by spending $5 million USD in expenditures by September 2021 and up to 75% of the project by solely funding an additional $40 million in expenditures by 2026.
  • Timok Project is up for Joint Venture, but no partner at the moment.
  • Strategic Alliance In Bulgaria with JOGMEC.
  • Large institutional holdings – 58%.

Ardea Resources (ARL:ASX)

MCAP – $59.44 AUD (at the time of writing)

Cash – $11.2 million AUD

  • Andrew Penkethman is the CEO.
  • Focused on both precious and base metals, with a primary push towards nickel-cobalt.
  • Goongarnie Nickel Cobalt Project – PFS: 2.25 Mtpa, before tax NPV of $2.4 billion and IRR of 31%, CAPEX cost $918 million USD, Pressure Acid Leach (PAL).
  • Large gold and nickel exploration land package totalling 3500 square kilometers.
  • Possibility to spin out gold focused projects and make Ardea solely a nickel company as we move into what may be a strong nickel price environment in the years ahead.

Equinox Gold (EQX:TSXV)

MCAP -$843.6 million

  • Christian Milau is CEO and Executive Director.
  • Ross Beatty is a major shareholder, owing 12% of the company.
  • Gold focused, with 3 advanced staged / mines in Brazil and California, USA.
  • Aurizona Gold Mine poured its first gold in May 2019, 2019 production guidance is set at 75 to 90,000 oz Au at a AISC of $950 to 1,025/oz.
  • Mesquite Gold Mine – in production, YTD 2019 – $70.8 million in revenue, 52K oz produced, $780/oz cost and a AISC of $907/oz. Production guidance updated to 125 to 145K oz at an AISC of $930 to 980/oz.
  • Castle Mountain – 3.6 Moz Au reserves, 16 year mine life, $763/oz avg LOM AISC – construction to begin second half of 2019.
  • Overal,l Equinox should produce 200 to 235K ounces in 2019, with a goal of attaining production over 1 million ounces per annum by 2023.

ISO Energy (ISO:TSXV)

MCAP – $49.9 million

Cash – $3 million

  • Craig Parry is the President and CEO.
  • Board of Directors is led by the Chairman Leigh Curyer, who is the CEO of NexGen Energy. NexGen owns arguably the best undeveloped uranium deposit in the world.
  • Team has the background to be successful in the Athabasca Basin.
  • NexGen owns 53.4%, Cameco owns 5.4%, Orano owns 2.0% and Institutional owns 19.2% – doesn’t leave much in the public float.
  • Summer Drill Program – Hurricane Zone – 8 holes into a 16 hole program on their Larocque East Project, which is located in the eastern portion of the Athabasca Basin. Targets are hosted in Sandstone/unconformity. Drill program is expected to cost $1.5 million, leaving them with $1.5 million going into 2020.
  • 3 other projects in their portfolio – Thorburn Lake, Radio and North Thorburn.

CanAlaska Uranium (CVV:TSXV)

MCAP – $11.24 million (at the time of writing)

Cash – roughly $1.0 million in cash and cash equivalents (April 2019).

  • Peter Dasler is President and CEO.
  • Prospect generator business model.
  • 3 main Projects: West McArthur, Cree East and NW Manitoba.
  • West McArthur is a JV with Cameco – Targeting a unconformity-basement uranium deposit.
  • Cree East has no JV partner – 9 target areas across the property, possibility of both basement and sandstone hosted uranium deposits.
  • NW Manitoba lies in close proximity to the Saskatchewan border and is similar geologically to Rabbit Lake, Collins Bay and Eagle Point Uranium mines which are within 90 km of the property.

Goviex Uranium (GXU:TSXV)

MCAP – $65.6 million (at the time of writing)

Cash – $2.8 million USD

Debt – $8.0 million USD

  • Daniel Major is the President and CEO.
  • 3 uranium projects, all located in Africa – Madaouela, Mutanga and Falea.
  • Flagship Madaouela Project is at the definitive feasibility study stage of development. The Republic of Niger has signed a definitive agreement to jointly develop the project.
  • After-tax NPV@8% – $340 million USD, IRR – 21.9% at a uranium price of $70 USD/lbs.
  • Orano (formerly Areva) operates a uranium mine in close proximity to Madaouela, which is reaching the end of its mine life.
  • “The State is to receive an additional working interest of 10% in exchange for approximately US$14.5 million of claims due by the Company to the State comprised of the final €7 million Madaouela I Mining Permit acquisition payment and settlement of previously challenged three years of area taxes (US$6.6 million) (collectively, the “Debt”) between the Company and the State related to the Madaouela Project. The Company is to receive a final, complete and unconditional release without reserves in respect of the Debt, upon the transfer the additional working Interest.” ~ News Release
  • The company is working at optimizing its metallurgy and subsequently extract value from the other base metals that are present – nickel, cobalt and molybdenum. Gravity separation and floatation techniques are being tested for their ability to concentrate the metals effectively. If successful, these advances have the potential to positively affect the project’s economics.

Don’t want to miss a new investment idea, interview or financial product review? Become a Junior Stock Review VIP now – it’s FREE!

Until next time,

Brian Leni  P.Eng

Founder – Junior Stock Review

Disclaimer: The following is not an investment recommendation, it is an investment idea. I am not a certified investment professional, nor do I know you and your individual investment needs. Please perform your own due diligence to decide whether this is a company and sector that is best suited for your personal investment criteria.  I have NO business relationship with any of the companies mentioned in this article. I am a shareholder of Aethon Minerals.

Posted on

Aftermath Book Review – Rickards’ Latest and Greatest

“Society does not get endlessly richer and more sophisticated. Periodically things collapse. It is not the end of the world. It is the end of an age.” ~ Rickards – The Road to Ruin – pg.297

Change is coming, I can feel it.

My sample size isn’t overly large, but in my life, I can’t remember society being as polarized between left and right as it is today. It isn’t just Canada and United States, either, it seems to be a good portion of the world.

So, why does it matter? Well, in my view, the root of where we are economically begins with the culture of the society. In this case, I’m referring to western culture or, more specifically, the derivatives of western culture which are found in Canada and the United States.

Western culture is of particular importance because its ebbs and flows, presently, have such a profound effect on the entire world. In fact, I would suggest that what I’m feeling is actually the degeneration of western culture and, in effect, the fall of the global economy as we currently know it.

For all intents and purposes, the United States represents the peak of western culture, as its rise to the world’s top power over the last 100 years has been predicated on all the ideals, mainly liberty and freedom, which allow the free thinking individual to prosper.

Instead, today we are headed on a path toward destruction. This path is one which is moving to remove the liberty and freedom of the individual and increasingly to replace it with government oversight, effectively removing an individual’s responsibility of choice.

In essence, the left and right are fighting to establish who knows best for everyone else. This will ultimately end in the failure of the western culture and, along with it, the collapse of the global economy in its current form.

Today, I have for you a review of James Rickards’ latest book, Aftermath – Seven Secrets of Wealth Preservation in the Coming Chaos. Aftermath is volume 4 in a quartet of books that included Currency Wars, The Death of Money and The Road to Ruin.

Much like the previous three, Aftermath doesn’t disappoint as it sets out a blueprint for wealth preservation in the coming chaos.

Let’s take a closer look.

Aftermath – Seven Secrets of Wealth Preservation in the Coming Chaos

Much like Currency Wars, The Death of Money and The Road to Ruin, in Aftermath Rickards uses both his experience and financial knowledge to outline his thesis for why a reset to the global monetary system is inevitable.

The chapters in Aftermath are broken down into topics, the ramifications of which could individually or collectively trigger the next global economic meltdown.

In my own words, here are the 7 topics that Rickards covers:

  • Tariffs and Trade Wars
  • Debt to GDP Ratio
  • Behaviour Economics
  • Passive Investing
  • Velocity of Money
  • Global Monetary Reset
  • Terminal Unit

Each of the topics is deserving of its own chapter, however, I particularly enjoyed the information Rickards provides on the debt to GDP ratio and behavioural economics. In my view, these 2 topics are of particular importance because I think that, ultimately, a crisis in the global economy will start with them.

Specifically, I believe quantitative easing (QE) and low interest rates are to the market as drugs are to an addict.  Therefore, pick your poison; more QE and low interest rates that will lead to an overdose, or go cold turkey, which will lead to the tremors and, most likely in this case, death. Either way, change is on the horizon.

Debt to GDP Ratio

Currently, the United States debt to GDP ratio sits at roughly 105%, a level which Rickards explains is considered by most economists to be above the point of no return. Once an economy reaches these critical levels, the growth of the economy is destroyed as any profits are directly fed into servicing the debt.

Japan is a great example of the effects of a high debt to GDP ratio, as the Japanese economy has been stagnant for multiple decades.

The obvious question then is, can’t the U.S. expand their debt to GDP ratio to the extent of Japan and still avoid a crisis? The answer is probably not; there would be a crisis of confidence before it reached the levels of the Japanese economy.

“The U.S. debt to GDP ratio is approaching the point at which it cannot expand much farther without inducing a crisis of confidence” ~ Aftermath

Firstly, while Japan’s debt is much larger than its GDP, the saving grace for the Japanese, in my opinion, is the fact that the Japanese people are its largest holders of its debt. Because of this, I believe there is a level of protection that the U.S., for example, doesn’t have.

Second, while the U.S. does appear, superficially, to have room to grow its debt to GDP ratio, the potential lack of confidence in the U.S.’s ability to service that debt begins to heighten. Unlike the Japanese, a good portion of the U.S. debt is held overseas and, thus, presents a major hurdle to further expansion.

Dwindling confidence will snowball and surely cause a major economic crisis. America’s debt to GDP ratio is in risky territory. In the chapter, ‘Putting out the Fire with Gasoline,’ Rickards walks you through the history and risks associated with debt to GDP rations and, most importantly, provides a tip for protecting your wealth against this major risk.

Human Behaviour

“Are humans risk adverse slugs or overconfident pretenders? The answer is both, depending on past circumstances and current conditions at the point of decision. This behaviour contradiction, one of many, illustrates why it is so difficult to make sense of human behaviour in markets” ~ Aftermath

We all have cognitive bias that affects the decisions we make. More specifically to the basis of this book review, it is the bias-laden investment decisions that many of us make that pose a major risk to the economy.

In the investment world, there is a tendency to follow the herd into buying the most popular stocks – for example, the FANG stocks (Facebook, Apple, Netflix and Google) or using the most popular investment techniques, such as passive or index investing. While the herd mentality can sometimes provide short-term profits, over the long haul, it typically ends in losses.

Currently, we sit at a very risky juncture in the stock market, where it sits at all time highs. All time highs mixed with the hyper-synchronicity investments is extremely dangerous for both the individual investor and the market as a whole.

If or when losses begin to mount, it will have a contagion effect on the market and, undoubtedly, lead to what could be major losses.

There is so much more to this topic which Rickards covers in the book – I won’t spoil it. Understanding this one chapter in the book could make all the difference in preserving your wealth.

Concluding Remarks

While it is easy to get caught up in the ‘when,’ as in when will the crisis occur, it really is a waste of time. No one can predict when complex events such as a global monetary reset will take place. In my opinion, it’s important to continue to live life as you normally would, but with some added financial prudence.

In my view, Aftermath is a MUST read for everyone, not just for those who are focused or interested in the global economy.  The benefits of understanding the ramifications of what has happened in the global economy over the last 10 years is integral for understanding where we may be headed.

In Aftermath, Rickards lays out the groundwork needed to protect your wealth in the future, no matter what’s around the corner.

While it may not be imminent, it does appear to be inevitable that a global monetary reset is on the horizon. Read Aftermath, The Road to Ruin, The Death of Money and Currency Wars – you won’t regret it!

Don’t want to miss a new investment idea, interview or financial product review? Become a Junior Stock Review VIP now – it’s FREE!

Until next time,

Brian Leni  P.Eng

Founder – Junior Stock Review

Disclaimer: The following is not an investment recommendation, it is an investment idea. I am not a certified investment professional, nor do I know you and your individual investment needs.

Posted on

Amarillo Gold – Developing Brazil’s Next Gold Mine

Amarillo Gold Corp

I’m constantly searching the junior resource sector for companies whose share price is trading for less than their value. In January of this year, I became an investor in Amarillo Gold, a junior company which I believe is trading for far less than their value.

A couple of weeks ago, I had the chance to travel to Brazil and see Amarillo’s flagship Mara Rosa Project, which is located in the northwest portion of the State of Goias.

Rafael Silveira, Myself, Frank Baker

The site visit was highly beneficial because it confirmed for me why I’m invested in Amarillo and why I believe it will be Brazil’s next gold mine. My reasons are as follows:

  • The Amarillo management team is well suited to moving Mara Rosa to and through construction, as their pedigree reveals a history of developing projects in Brazil. From the CEO to the team located in Brazil, each member has been in the mining industry a long time and has a specific skill set which is applicable to the development of Mara Rosa.
  • The Mara Rosa Project is advanced with an updated Pre-Feasbility Study (PFS) completed in the fall of 2018. The PFS revealed an after-tax NPV@5% of $US 244.3 million at $US 1300/oz gold, which means, at the time of writing, with a MCAP of less than $30 million CAD, the company is currently trading at less than 10% of its PFS after-tax value.
  • Expansion of the resource – There is a realistic probability of expansion of the Posse Deposit resource at depth and to the northeast. Examining soil sampling, geophysics and historical drilling, the northeast portion of the property looks particularly interesting to me, given its size. Drilling isn’t a priority at the moment for the company, but could spell more upside potential in the future.
  • While a controversial figure, Jair Bolsonaro will bring about a positive economic change to Brazil. This is already evident with the pension reform bill which is moving through the Brazilian government’s approval process, as I write. Ultimately, I believe Amarillo’s current price to value proposition is well worth the risk.
  • The town of Mara Rosa and its people, from what I could tell, view the construction of the mine positively and look forward to the jobs that it will bring. There are many active and former mines in the northern region of the State of Goias, making it a great spot for development.
  • Takeover Candidate – while I believe Amarillo is currently a takeover candidate, I believe that upon the completion of the Definitive Feasibility Study (DFS) it becomes much more appealing to senior or mid-tier mining companies, as the DFS will bring more confidence and validation to the economics of the project.

Amarillo isn’t without risk; I believe there is at least one hurdle which the company must overcome in order to be fairly valued by the market. That hurdle is the metallurgy of the Posse Deposit, which has been a major focus for the company since they purchased the deposit from Western Mining in 2003.

While the mineralization is complex, I believe the company is on track for proving up and optimizing the metallurgical process that is needed to economically extract the gold from the Posse deposit ore.

In my opinion, Amarillo Gold is trading for less than its value. I was a buyer at 20 cents and believe a re-rating in the share price is just around the corner.

Without further ado, a look at why I am a buyer of Amarillo Gold.

Enjoy!

Amarillo Gold

MCAP – $28.8 million (at the time of writing)

Shares – 140.8 million

FD – 185.6 million

Cash – $3.0 million (as of June 30, 2019)

Insider Ownership – 10%

Institutional Ownership – 60%

Bolsonaro’s Affect on Brazil

In the fall of 2018, I wrote an article on Brazil and why I’m optimistic about its future. My thesis was primarily based on, at the time, presidential candidate Jair Bolsonaro winning the election and taking control of the country.

For those who are unaware, Bolsonaro was victorious and is now the President of Brazil.

So now, roughly 9 months later and with the basis of my thesis fulfilled, what do I think about Brazil and its future, now having spent close to a week there? Am I still optimistic?

Determining the answer to this question has been much harder than I would have guessed prior to my trip. I believe Bolsonaro will have a positive effect on Brazil’s economy, because he is seemingly dedicated to minimizing the amount of corruption in the government and to appointing leadership within it based on merit, not to fulfill a favour or bribe. This will have very positive effects.

During my trip, I actively engaged as many Brazilians (who spoke English) as I could to learn about their views of Brazil, mainly where it is as a country and where it’s headed under the leadership of Bolsonaro.

Interestingly, much like Trump in America, Bolsonaro has a polarizing affect on people; they either love him or they hate him. Even some of the Brazilians who said they voted for him, hate him. I found this particularly interesting and wanted to know why.

 Most often, I was told that there wasn’t anyone else to vote for and, bottom line, government corruption has to be reduced for Brazil to be successful.

Of the younger generation, let’s say under 30, I met only one person who thought that Bolsonaro was good for the country. The rest hated him and said that he is going to destroy it as he takes away some of the services and “privileges” that many of the Brazilian people have come to rely upon.

Further, the same younger generation yearns for former President and now convicted criminal, Lula Da Silva, who is currently in jail for his involvement (while President) with Operation Car Wash. In my opinion, this is truly bizarre, but goes to show you that people only see what they want to see.

There is much more to this discussion, but I will leave it here because it’s out of the prevue of this article. My conclusion on Brazil is this; I believe Bolsonaro will have a positive effect economically on Brazil, which, ultimately, should make it a more desirable place to do business during his reign.

What I have seen, however, only strengthens my thought that it takes multiple generations or hundreds of years to change a culture and, therefore, while Bolsonaro will have an impact during his term, it will be minimal and short lived, as I do expect to see a return to a left-leaning government in the future.

With this said, in my opinion, investing within a “risky” jurisdiction is always a matter of a risk adjusted price to value comparison. Meaning, am I getting enough upside potential to warrant investment?

Additionally, remember that there is risk in every jurisdiction, even the ones that are widely thought to be tier 1 locations for mining investment. I will quote Rick Rule, CEO of Sprott U.S. Holdings, who recently said to me,

“Mostly the controllable aspect of political risk is price and probability…I would argue with you right now that the People’s Republic of British Columbia, which is regarded as a superb place for politics, is extraordinarily risky. The BC provincial legislature is a joint venture between the Socialists and the Greens. Not exactly mining’s best friend… Yes, Brazil has a long standing history of formal corruption. I would ask you what the difference between a campaign contribution and a bribe is.” ~

Therefore, with regards to Amarillo Gold, in my opinion, there’s enough upside potential to warrant investment in the company, as it’s currently trading at less than 10% of its updated PFS after-tax NPV of $US 244.3 million.

Amarillo’s Leadership

Amarillo is led by CEO, Mike Mutchler, who is a mining engineer by trade. Mutchler’s experience in the sector relates well to the needs of Amarillo, as he is an experienced mine builder. Most recently, Mutchler was COO of Largo Resources, which built a vanadium mine in Brazil.

Although he hasn’t been a CEO, his skill set and education, in my opinion, should be the perfect recipe for what Amarillo needs to be successful in completing their FS on the Mara Rosa Project and, most importantly, making it Brazil’s next gold mine.

Next, we have Roland Uloth, who is Amarillo’s Executive Chairman. Uloth has extensive experience within the business world, with the last 20 years focused on the mining sector. Notably, Uloth has been a key executive with both River Gold Mines and Wesdome.

Additionally, I think it should be noted that Uloth has been a major buyer of Amarillo stock on the open market, as the SEDI insider buying report is littered with his purchases. According to SEDI, Uloth currently owns over 6 million shares, excluding warrants.

Finally, and arguably the most important member of the Amarillo team at this juncture, is Arao Portugal, who was just officially named Amarillo’s Country Manager. Country Manager isn’t a common position within a junior mining company, but makes complete sense in this case.

Portugal brings a unique set of skills and experience to Amarillo, which I believe are vital to the overall success of the company as they look to attain their final 2 permits – the Installation License (IL) and the Operation License (OL).

There are a few more important players on the Amarillo team: Frank Baker – Metallurgist and Project Manager, Luis Carlos F. Da Silva – Geology Manager, Alexandre Elisel and Rafael Silveira – Geologists.

Mara Rosa Project

The Mara Rosa Project encompasses roughly 60,000 ha and sits just a few minutes’ drive from the centre of the town of Mara Rosa, which is located in the northern portion of the State of Goias.  This region of the State is very familiar with mining, as there are a number of former and currently operating mines in the region.

Most notably is Lundin’s Chapada copper-gold Mine, AngloGold Ashanti and Kinross’ Serra Grande Gold Mine, and Anglo American’s Barro Alto nickel mine, to name just a few. The point is, with these mines being within 100 km, the people of Mara Rosa and the surrounding area are very familiar with mining and the benefits that come with it.

Amarillo’s Main Office and Core Shack – Located in Mara Rosa

As well, given the amount of mining in this portion of the State, infrastructure is good; in particular, power is readily accessible with a sub-station within 4 km of the Mara Rosa Project. The hydro power in this area is supplied by the 450 MW Serra Mesa Hydro Electric dam.

Pre-Feasibility Study Economics

In September of 2018, Amarillo released an updated PFS on Mara Rosa and revealed some very robust economics.

Contractor Mine Scenario

Gold Price Assumption – $US 1300 per ounce

After-tax Net Present Value (NPV) at a 5% discount – $US 244.3 million

After-tax Internal Rate of Return (IRR) – 50.8%

CAPEX – $US 122.9 million

AISC – $US 655 per ounce

Reserves (Proven and Probable) – 1.087 Moz of gold

Resources (Measured and Indicated) – 1.3 Moz of gold

Satellite Image of Mara Rosa Project

In my opinion, the Mara Rosa Project has great economics, with good downside risk protection in terms of the gold price. Robust economics at the PFS stage of development is a really good sign, as there is a higher degree of confidence that the Project can deal with issues that may arise given the rigorous analysis which is yielded by the DFS.

Site Visit – July 2019

My trip to Mara Rosa, Brazil from Toronto was very straightforward. I flew overnight from Toronto to Sao Paulo, which is approximately a 10.5 hour flight. To note, Sao Paulo’s Guarulhos International Airport has seen some great upgrades since I was last in Brazil in 2011. I’m guessing that the 2016 Rio Olympics brought about  this overhaul.

Next, I had a short 2 hour flight from Sao Paulo to Brazil’s capital, Brasilia. Interestingly, after doing a 17.5 hour flight from San Francisco to Singapore in April of this year, I found these flights to be easy!

Brasilia Airport – Domestic Terminal

From Brasilia, a company representative picked me up at the airport and we headed northwest to the town of Mara Rosa, which is roughly a 4.5 hour drive. The drive between Brasilia and Mara Rosa is pretty good considering the amount of heavy truck traffic those roads appear to receive.

Rest Stop Along the Road Between Brasilia and Mara Rosa

Along with the multiple 2 lane highways that head north out of Brasilia, there is also a railway which runs right beside the Mara Rosa Project. Rail is a great way to reduce the amount of truck traffic, however, it sounds like this railway isn’t used to its full extent, which is too bad as it would save the roads and, ultimately, make them safer for commuters.

2011 View from Sugar Loaf Mountain – Rio de Janeiro

My previous trip to Brazil was spent in and around Rio de Janeiro, which is much different than what I encountered in the capital region. Rio is a very mountainous and lush environment, which clearly gets an optimal amount of sun and rain, as it is a veritable jungle surrounding you as you drive into Rio.

Future Mine Site in the Distance

By comparison, the Federal District of Brasilia and the Northern portion of the State of Goias is much different. In terms of topography, it is much flatter, drier and open, with farmers’ fields lining the highways. The region, however, does have a rainy season where the rain fall is very heavy, which allows for the endless farmers’ fields and well-established jungle-like vegetation.

Northeast Corner of the Posse Deposit

NOTE: The area surrounding the town of Mara Rosa is known for its production of turmeric spice. While walking the property, one of the geologists pointed out some turmeric bulbs lying on the ground. There are fields of these plants, their bulbs are harvested, dried and ground into a powder, which is then packaged and sold in grocery stores. Farming is the major industry in this part of Brazil and is what currently drives (economically) towns such as Mara Rosa.

Expansion of the Posse Deposit

As per the 2018 updated PFS, the Posse deposit has 1,087 koz of proven and probable gold reserves at an average grade of 1.42 g/t. While this is great, more ounces would be even better and, given what I saw onsite and reviewing historical exploration data with the geological team, there’s reasonable probability that the Posse Deposit could be extended at depth and to the northeast.

Reviewing some of the past geophysics on the deposit, you can clearly see that the anomaly, of approximately twice the size of the existing deposit, extends out to the northeast. The focus of previous drilling campaigns has been on the main deposit, however, there is historical drilling data on a few holes that have been drilled along the northeast extension.

As you can see in the image above, there hasn’t been much step out drilling, but what has been done has returned some decent hits. I believe it will be well worth the time and money to see if it’s something of significance.

One other note, while an extension to the northeast of Posse would be great, under the current Preliminary License (LP), the seasonal creek that cuts perpendicularly across the strike of the northeast extension would prevent Amarillo from expanding their current pit to include the new discovery.

However, the company does have the option to apply for modifications to their existing LP, which, if they choose to, could include the temporary re-routing of the creek so that this northeast area is available for mining.

Seasonal Creek in the northeast of the property

Tailings Dam

The tragic failure of Vale’s tailings dam in the neighbouring State of Minas Gervais resulted in the death of 300 people. Talking to many mining engineers, the design of the dam that failed has long been known to have some major weaknesses and, thus, in my mind, was preventable.

Moving forward, similarly designed tailings dams can be upgraded to prevent this from occurring again in the future. It sounds like the Brazilian government, however, is going a step further and will announce the banning of all tailings dams in future construction, regardless of the design.

In my opinion, this is a knee-jerk reaction to an issue which is solved through proper engineering and, most of all, the diligence of the companies that operate these mines and tailings facilities. Banning the construction of this integral part of a mine is crazy.

In saying this, there are alternatives to the traditional tailings facilities and, with this in mind, Amarillo’s leadership has decided to proactively pursue one of these alternatives given the potential direction of the Brazilian Government.

Reviewing the location of Tailings Mat Storage

So how does this new approach affect Amarillo’s mine plan and economics? That’s a great question. First off, the company is pursuing a horizontal filtration technology which is proven to reduce the moisture content of the tailings. The end product of the process yields what the company reps were describing as tailings mats.

These tailings mats are still required to be stored in a lined storage facility, meaning the basis of construction for the original tailings dam will still be used to dry stack the mats. The company reps tell me that this change in process shouldn’t cause any issue with their already issued preliminary license (LP).

In all, the cost for the filtration system is roughly $US 10 million in CAPEX dollars and is estimated to require another $US 1 per tonne in operating cost per year over the course of the life of the mine. I haven’t added this new cost to my discounted cash flow model yet, but given the economics of the project, I’m guessing this won’t be a huge issue.

 

Archeology Testing

Standard practice in Brazil is to conduct archeological studies on the properties that are moving toward construction. This process requires a certain amount of area on a property to be studied for historical significance.

During my visit, a team of archeologists was on site performing the study. For someone who finds these studies really interesting, it was great to have the opportunity to see part of the process in person.

At the dig site I visited, they had just discovered some remnants of bowls and an area which had  been used for fires at some point. In the image below, to the right of the teal pan, the bowl artifacts have been outlined in small white pins. These artifacts will be removed from site and stored in a museum.

While the archeological study is not over, it is expected to have minimal to no impact on the Mara Rosa Project construction plans, which is good to hear.

Metallurgy

As I mentioned in my intro, the metallurgy of the Posse Deposit is most likely the largest hurdle to the success of Amarillo moving forward. I am, however, personally very encouraged by what I see in the testing the company has performed to date, and believe that the metallurgical testing performed for the FS will turn the tide, in terms of how the market views the risk associated with the economic extraction of the gold.

There’s much to cover with regards to the metallurgical processing of the Posse Deposit mineralization, so I’m going to cover this in a separate Part 2 of this article.

Concluding Remarks

Currently, Amarillo Gold is selling at a fraction of its updated PFS NPV, which, I believe, gives an investor plenty of upside potential given the risk associated with the company.  Amarillo’s focus is completion of their DFS, which will pave the way for the remaining permits and, ultimately, the construction of Brazil’s next gold mine.

Stay tuned for Part 2 of my Amarillo Gold Site Visit article, where I will cover the Posse Deposit’s metallurgy and why I believe the company is on the right track to put this risk behind them.

Don’t want to miss a new investment idea, interview or financial product review? Become a Junior Stock Review VIP now – it’s FREE!

Until next time,

Brian Leni  P.Eng

Founder – Junior Stock Review

Disclaimer: The following is not an investment recommendation, it is an investment idea. I am not a certified investment professional, nor do I know you and your individual investment needs. Please perform your own due diligence to decide whether this is a company and sector that is best suited for your personal investment criteria. Currently, I do own Amarillo Gold Corporation stock.

All Amarillo Gold Corporation analytics were taken from their website and press release. Junior Stock Review has NO business relationship with Amarillo Gold Corporation. Amarillo Gold Corporation did pay for travel expenses for the site visit.

Posted on

A Conversation with Rick Rule, CEO of Sprott U.S. Holdings

Becoming a competent investor requires the constant willingness to learn and the pushing aside of what you think you know. Over the course of my personal investing career, there have been a handful of people who have greatly influenced the way I invest my money in the market. Rick Rule, without a doubt, has had the largest impact to date.

In a few weeks, July 30th to August 3rd, the annual Sprott Natural Resource Symposium will take place in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Rule will be giving a speech at 8 am on August 1st entitled, Lessons, Re-Learned, In a Bear Market.

In my opinion, this single speech is worth the price of admission, never mind the whole host of other headline speakers, such as Doug Casey, James Rickards and Grant Williams to name just a few.

Today, I have for you a conversation with Rick Rule. In our conversation, we covered a number of topics, but most importantly, Rule explains why it’s vital for an investor to be self-aware and, secondly, frames the mindset which is needed to invest in “risky” jurisdictions.

Additionally, at the end of the interview, Rule gives you, the reader, a great offer that I hope you will take him up on!

See you at the Symposium.

Enjoy

Brian: Access to cash is to the junior resource companies like air is to human beings; an absolute necessity.

For many, Toronto, Canada represents the Mecca of junior mining finance. However, it appears this may be rapidly changing, as the bear market in resources is not only affecting investor profits, but also the banks and institutions which have, for many years, been the suppliers of cash to junior resource sector.

I have a two-part question; First, in your opinion, do you agree that Toronto’s role as the center of the junior mining finance world is diminishing? Secondly, if so, do you foresee any repercussions for this seemingly major change?

 Rick: I think to an extent, Toronto’s role may be declining, it’s really a consequence of the increase in participation in other parts of the world. I’m thinking particularly of the Pacific Basin, Hong Kong, Shanghai, and of course, Sydney. Toronto still punches, Toronto and by extension Vancouver, still punch well above their weight on a global scene, meaning that they still originate more capital for mining that is consumed inside Canada. It’s worthy to note the centers of excellence occur in both cities that make important contributions to the service sectors in those cities. My suspicion is that as the mining market turns from cyclical lows that the importance of Toronto and Vancouver, that is the importance of Canada, as a mining finance center, will continue.

Brian: Over the last month or so, the gold price has been strong, surpassing the US$1400 /oz mark, a price we haven’t seen since 2013.  While a rising gold price will undoubtedly draw more eyes to the sector, which is positive, I can’t help but think that there are some drawbacks to a world with a rising gold price.

How do you view a world with rising gold prices?

Rick: Gold traditionally has functioned as insurance, which means it does well when confidence decreases. The circumstance that would see a very high gold price would almost certainly be a poor outcome for most aspects of your life and your portfolio. The truth is that gold does well in response to things like war or economic unrest.

So the circumstance that would see gold at levels that some forecasters have talked about, $5,000 US and now $6,000 US, and now $7,000 US an ounce, would not be pleasant for the rest of your portfolio. That said, I think a prudent investor always allocates for circumstances that would be problematic. And gold, for thousands of years, has operated in that part of people’s portfolio.

BrianAre market sentiment and fundamentals like the chicken and the egg? Meaning, does it make a difference which one comes first to alter the tide from a bear to bull market?

Rick: I believe it does. I believe in mining, well, I believe in all economic activities that bull markets are the authors of bear markets and vice versa. People’s expectation of the future is set by their experience in the immediate past, and it’s my belief that markets overshoot in both directions. I believe the next bull market in mining will be a consequence of people’s anticipation of success being so low that the challenge for the industry would be to get under the bar rather than over the bar.

In other words, the industry needs to beat people’s expectations for a while. People’s expectations are now so low that beating those expectations will, in fact, be easy. The fundamentals must change relative to value before expectations change. And, mercifully, the mining industry is in the midst, the beginning, of a renaissance I believe that will cause it to do exactly that.

Brian: Over the last year or so, I have found great value in studying my losses and trying to find similarities in my mode of failure.  Not surprisingly, there is a commonality in my failure mode and it is directly linked to my own bias tendencies.

Self awareness is important in all aspects of life, but hard for some to attain. I heard a wise man once say,

“you may not know who you are, but I bet you can tell me who you aren’t.”

This really resonated with me because the more I think about it, the more this backwards type of thinking makes sense.

As an investor, how important is it to be self-aware?

Rick: I think that’s probably the most important question I’ve been asked all month. And I would suggest to you that there are many paths to investment success, but they all begin with who you are. I have learned myself that most of my worst investment wounds were in fact self-inflicted. And while I look at the range of risks in the market, interest rates, governments, dishonest promoters, the biggest risk that I face is conveniently located to the right of my left ear and to the left of my right ear. That is my own biases.

We talked a bit in the prior question about the earliest bias. We all believe ourselves to be rational fact seekers, taking information from all sources, and organizing that information logically and making rational conclusions. That’s not what happens. We, in fact, select information that makes us comfortable with our existing prejudices and biases. And the truth is that we have short memories. Our experience in the recent and the immediate past shapes our expectation for the future much more than our experience going back two decades or three decades, which is, in fact, more valuable.

I think if anybody takes away anything from this interview it is being self honest, attempting to be self honest, pardon me, checking your biases, and continuing to invest in your own education is the best guarantee that you can have of investment success.

Brian: In my opinion, political risk within a jurisdiction is rooted within the culture of the society in which it inhabits. Therefore, understanding the culture of the society is integral for gauging the risk of a prospective investment.

Being bullish on one of the world’s riskiest jurisdictions is usually correlated with some major change within the given country’s politics. However, I’m not sure if the change that is expected is ever really real, as most countries seemingly never escape the handle of ‘risky.’

Is it possible to have or expect real change in risky jurisdictions?

Rick: I think you need to define a risky jurisdiction. The truth is that mining is a location specific and capital intensive business, so it is particularly prone to political risk. It’s also a small business, which means that it never enjoys the political power necessary to defend itself. Mostly, the controllable aspect of political risk is price and probability. People who look like you and I, and I’m venturing into dangerous territory here, politically risky it can go, tend to believe that money that is stolen from us by white people in English, according to the rule of law, is less gone than money that’s stolen from us in ways that we understand less well.

So, I believe a lot of political risk is expectation and the price that one assumes for the risk. My biggest economic experience with political risk occurred 30 years ago in a wayward jurisdiction known as the People’s Republic of California where net present value in excess of about $700 million was taken by shareholders by the capricious California legislature. And people tell me that Congo is risky.

I would argue with you right now that the People’s Republic of British Columbia, which is regarded as a superb place for politics, is extraordinarily risky. The BC provincial legislature is a joint venture between the Socialists and the Greens. Not exactly mining’s best friend. The wealth grabs that the BC legislature in Vancouver City Council have made frankly protectionist racist taxes on foreign investors are, I think, a harbinger in the future. So, when people talk about cultures and political risk, people need to discriminate I think based on their understanding of the culture that they operate in and the culture that they are familiar with. Yes, Brazil has a long standing history of formal corruption. I would ask you what the difference between a campaign contribution and a bribe is.

Brian: Having attended many resource sector focused investment conferences over the years, it’s clear, to me at least, that the majority of investors in the sector are in their, so-to-speak, ‘golden years.’ The younger generations, mainly the millennials, on mass, are virtually absent with their attention seemingly more focused on cannabis and crypto. The question that comes to my mind is, why? Is it a matter of relatability?

In your opinion, why has the resource sector failed to attract the millennial generation’s investment dollars, thus far?

Rick: I think that the younger generation is extremely narrative oriented, and the resource narrative hasn’t played out for a long time. My own generation, we’re definitely past our sell by date. Certainly in the ’60s, we were attracted to much more mainstream investment activities until our paradigms were changed by the decade of the ’70s, which saw natural resources explode in price, and that price justified the narrative to us.

My suspicion is that sometime in the next 10 years we are going to have another upward move in resource prices, in particular precious metals prices, and I think the precious metals narrative. Appealing to people’s greed and fear will have an extremely profound impact on millennials. Interestingly, I have found in the last 18 months that the inbound interest that Sprott has received around the world is now about evenly divided between younger people and older people, and is interestingly now 40% female. A circumstance which I have never seen before.

So, while the situation that you describe still prevails today, I would suggest to you that it’s changing very, very rapidly. The industry is attracting interest from around the world rather than just from developed countries. It is attracting increasing interest from younger people, and for the first time in my career, attracting substantial interest from younger females.


Brian: Conferences are a great way to expand your knowledge of the sector and to speak to the people who are running the companies in which you’re speculating. Learn who these people are – you’re trusting them with your money.  

For those looking for a conference to attend, I highly suggest that you attend the Sprott Natural Resource Symposium from July 30th to August 2nd in Vancouver.  In my opinion, it’s by far the best conference in the business and worth every penny.

In your opinion, what’s the value proposition of the Sprott Natural Resource Symposium?

Rick: I think we have several value propositions. The first is that the sort of keynote headline speakers, the generalists, who go to the narrative that we were just discussing, our top, top, top line. Danielle Dimartino Booth, sort of a new voice on the scene, but a profoundly bright individual. She will be joined on the main podium by Nomi Prins, another person who just came to prominence in the last decade. Of course, Jim Rickards will be back, and Doug Casey will be back.

But keeping the macro theme company. Importantly at this conference there will be five or six presenters who have built multi-billion-dollar natural resource companies from standing starts. People who can talk about how you generate billions of dollars of wealth in the resource business, and how their experience building companies has shaped how they invest and how it can help the way you invest.

Importantly, at this conference, our attendees have told us that the exhibitors, the public companies who come to tout their wares, are more than advertisers. The attendees say that the exhibitors are content, too. So in our conference, which is different than other conferences, in order to be allowed to exhibit a public company it must be owned in a Sprott managed equity account. That doesn’t sadly guarantee that everything we invest in goes up in price. But the truth is that you will have a curated list of exhibitors, which are all owned in Sprott managed accounts, and by Sprott principles.

So, I think the combination of an absolutely great top line group of commentators and newsletter editors, with combined circulations over a million people, a high quality group of industry people who have made billions of dollars for their investors, and a curated group of exhibitors combine to make this, I think, the finest high net worth retail natural resource conference on the planet.

Brian: That’s great. I’m really looking forward to it. Thank you very much for your time today.

Rick: Always a pleasure, Brian. If I may, I would like to offer your readers an inducement to get to know Sprott. For any of your listeners who care, I am willing to personally rank their speculative resource portfolio.

If they would email me the names and symbols in text, not as an attachment, in an email to RRule@sprottglobal.com, I will rank their holdings and send them back by return email.

Absolutely no obligation on their part. This is something that we do to get to know people. So if that is of interest, I invite your listeners to email me personally.


Brian: That’s a great offer. Thank you very much, Rick.

Rick: Always a pleasure. Thank you. I look forward to seeing you in Vancouver.

Don’t want to miss a new investment idea, interview or financial product review? Become a Junior Stock Review VIP now – it’s FREE!

Until next time,

Brian Leni  P.Eng

Founder – Junior Stock Review

Disclaimer: The following is not an investment recommendation, it is an investment idea. I am not a certified investment professional, nor do I know you and your individual investment needs. Please perform your own due diligence to decide whether this is a company and sector that is best suited for your personal investment criteria.

Posted on

Genesis Metals Corp. – Gold Exploration in the Heart of the Abitibi Greenstone Belt

What is the significance of surpassing $1400 USD per ounces of gold?

Personally, I view the price of gold as a bell weather for the global economy, essentially signalling the health of markets. Without a doubt in my mind, the complexity of the global marketplace is only increasing and because of this, I can’t help but think that any of these attempts to control it will fail and only add to the damage that has already been done.

Ultimately, I believe, we are headed to some sort of reset of the global monetary system and breaking $1400 USD per ounce, a price we haven’t seen since 2013, signals we are getting closer.

So what does this mean for the junior gold companies? Great question.

As many of you will know, I think a bullish outlook for a metal price is a poor reason to invest within the junior resource sector, however, while this is my view, it seems that the vast majority of investors think differently.

Therefore, I suspect, given the rise in the gold price, we may be entering a new bull market in gold stocks.

Today, I have for you an update on Genesis Metals Corp., a junior gold company which is exploring and developing their flagship Chevrier Gold Project, in the world famous Abitibi Greenstone Belt in Quebec.

Let’s take a look.

Genesis Metals Corporation

MCAP – $7.4 million (at the time of writing)

Shares – 109.2 million

FD – 132.1 million

Management and Advisors – 16%

Other Major Shareholders – Osisko Mining, Eric Sprott, Gold 2000, Delbrook Capital, US Global Investors, SIDEX/SDBJ and Medalist Capital – 34%

Retail – 50%

Chevrier Gold Project – 2019 Exploration

2019 marks a reboot in Genesis’ approach to developing its flagship Chevrier Gold Project.

What do I mean by this? Well, the last few years, much of the exploration and development dollars have been spent on expanding and delineating the project’s Main Zone.

In all, the money has been well spent, as the updated resource estimate, released earlier this year, reveals the Main Zone has an indicated resource of 395,000 ounces at 1.45 g/t and an inferred resource of 297,000 ounces att 1.33 g/t, using a 0.5 g/t cut-off.

This field season at Chevrier will be different, as the company looks to generate new high-grade gold targets, as they have expanded their land package along the Fancamp Deformation Corridor and, more importantly, have enlisted Dr. Rob Carpenter and the highly accomplished team at Vector Geological Solutions to lead a modern exploration program across the entire property.

The Vector team is made up of Dan MacNeil and Dr. Alan Wainwright, each which has had extensive exploration experience and successes within the sector.

Exploration will begin with property-wide till sampling. For those who aren’t familiar, till sampling is used to identify target metals, such as gold, in areas which have been glaciated.

In these regions, glaciers have eroded the target metals from the underlying rock and transported them away from their source. Therefore, today, by digging down to the till layer which sits right above the bedrock, exploration teams can better sample for gold.

Till sampling is a highly effective tool in an exploration company’s arsenal and will reveal where they should focus their attention with localized geological mapping, trenching and geophysics.

It is key, that while the existence of gold within the till samples is obviously paramount, the Vector team isn’t necessarily as concerned with the grade of gold, but more on the gold grain morphology.

MacNeil explained to me that the grain morphology is vital in understanding the source of gold, as the shape and surface texture of the gold grain is an indicator of how far away the gold may have travelled from its source.

Source: Research Gate – Grain Morphology Example

Chevrier has been expanded to 275 square kilometers along one of the most famous gold corridors within the Abitibi. With this methodical approach to exploration, I think that there is a high probability that they will identify a few great high-grade gold targets for the next drill program.

Secondly, we have to keep in mind that the Main Zone is still open at depth, which, in my mind, shows great promise for further expansion of the deposit. The Abitibi is famous for its deep, steeply dipping high-grade gold deposits and, therefore, the next drill program should be chock full of high potential targets.

Changes in Leadership

On June 24th, Genesis announced the resignation of Chairman and CEO, Brian Groves, and the appointment of Adrian Fleming as Chairman of the Board, and Jeff Sundar as interim CEO.

To refresh your memory, Fleming is a geologist by trade with over 40 years of experience in both technical and executive roles. Some highlights include being a founding director at Northern Empire and Underworld Resources, both of which were acquired by majors.

Additionally, Sundar has been a driving force behind Genesis as its President over the last few years and, I think, will do well in his new role. Sundar has over 20 years of experience in the mining industry, and is a former Director of Northern Empire, which was sold to Coeur Mining for $117 million in October of 2018. Also, he was a VP/Director of Underworld Resources, which was acquired by Kinross for $140 million in the last cycle.

The Genesis team is rounded out by Exploration Manager, Andre Liboiron; Director, John Florek; Independent Director, Keenan Hohol; Independent Director, Robert Scott and Steve Williams.

A Discovery Group Company

Genesis Metals Corp. is a part of the Discovery Group of Companies, which is led by John Robins and Jim Paterson. Discovery Group has churned out some of the best stories the sector has seen over the last few years.

A few of the M&A successes have been Kaminak Gold Corp., which was sold to Goldcorp for $520 million, and Northern Empire Resources Corp. which, as my readers, you are very familiar with; they were sold this past summer to Coeur Mining for $117 million.

Additionally, you have other high-quality resource projects, such as Bluestone Resources Inc., Fireweed Zinc Ltd. and Great Bear Resources, all of which have had success over the last year, as they move their projects forward.

In short, Genesis’ entry into Discovery Group speaks to the potential of the company and to its management team, a group in which Robins and Paterson must have confidence, as their reputations are now linked.

Strategic Advisors

While not being a part of the company’s main team, strategic advisors can play key roles in the development of a project. In particular, Genesis has done a great job assembling a cast of advisors that have resumes filled with success, particularly in exploration, resource expansion, capital markets and, arguably most important to the Genesis story, M&A.

Being a Discovery Group Company comes with not only the notoriety of being a part of the group, but also means, in this case, that both Robins and Paterson will play strategic advisor roles for the company.

John Robins is a professional geologist by trade with a wide variety of experience over the course of his more than 30 years within the industry. Robins was both a founder and Chairman of Kaminak and, in 2008, was recognized for his achievements in mining exploration by the Association for Mineral Exploration British Columbia with the H.H. “Spud” Huestis Award.

Jim Paterson has more than 22 years within the mining industry with experience in raising capital, M&A, joint-ventures, spin-outs, RTOs and IPOs. Currently, he is Chairman and CEO of Valore Metals Corp and was a founding Director of Northern Empire Resources Corp.

Genesis will benefit greatly from having these two men as strategic advisors, as they move their flagship Chevrier Gold Project forward.

New Additions

In November of 2018, Genesis announced that Dr. Rob Carpenter, Dr. Andrew Ramcharan and Garrett Ainsworth would be joining their list of strategic advisors.

Dr. Carpenter is a professional geoscientist with over 25 years of experience in the resource sector. He is best known as co-founder, President and CEO of Kaminak Gold Corporation (2005 to 2013) and its multi-million ounce Coffee Gold Project, where he is credited with the initial discovery and leading the company to it maiden resource estimate. Kaminak was sold to Goldcorp in 2016 for $520 million.

Dr. Ramcharan is a professional engineer with over 18 years of experience in operations, project evaluation, M&A, finance and investor relations. Most recently, he was a managing Director of Project Evaluation for both debt and equity financings at Sprott Inc.

Last but not least, Garrett Ainsworth is a geologist by trade and former VP Exploration for NexGen Energy, which discovered the world-class Arrow Uranium Deposit in Canada’s Athabasca Basin.

4th Best Jurisdiction for Mining Investment in the World

From a jurisdictional standpoint, it doesn’t get much better than Quebec when it comes to mining investment attractiveness. The Fraser Institute (FI) gives Quebec an index score of 88.38, ranking it 2nd in Canada and 4th in the world. FI’s mining investment attractiveness index score is reflective of both the mineral potential and the government policy perception of the region.

Quebec’s Mineral Potential

Quebec is home to 25 producing mines and over 350 surface mineral mining operations, putting the value of Quebec’s mineral shipments at $8.7 billion in 2014 (Investissement Quebec). Quebec is Canada’s 2nd largest producer of gold, largest producer of iron and zinc, and the only North American producer of niobium. The mineral wealth is evident and is a big reason why FI ranks Quebec among the world’s top ten in mining investment attractiveness.

Highlighting Quebec’s world-class mineralization is the Abitibi Greenstone Belt (AGB), which is 150 km wide and stretches 650 km from roughly Wawa, Ontario to Val d’Or, Quebec. The belt has produced millions of ounces of gold over its history, with the Cadillac Gold Camp, Virginiatown, Rouyn-Noranda Gold Camp, and Val d’Or Gold Camp being just a few of its largest contributors.

genesis updated abitibi map

Quebec Politics and Infrastructure

The government of Quebec supports mineral exploration within its borders with a tax credit system that refunds 25% of eligible exploration expenses for non-operating corporations, and 10% of eligible exploration expenses for operating corporations (Financial Incentives). So, roughly, for every $1 of non-flow through raised capital spent by a Quebec based mineral explorer, 25 cents will come back to the company, which can effectively be rolled right back into further exploration work. This is not only a huge plus for the company and its shareholders, but an ingenious way for the province to promote mineral exploration.

The long history of mining in the AGB means that most regions of the belt are accessible or near infrastructure such as highways, rail, power, and deep water ports along the St. Lawrence Seaway. Also, Quebec boasts some of the most competitive electricity rates in Canada, as its hydroelectric dams constitute a major portion of its electricity production.

Finally, Quebec takes great pride in a transparent mining system, which is built around three key pillars:

“Open access to resources is ensured on the largest possible portion of territory, Mineral rights are granted on a first-come, first-served basis and if a discovery is made, the title holder can be reasonably sure of obtaining the right to develop the resource.” ~ Investissement Quebec

NOTE: Quebec provincial funds, SIDEX, SDBJ and FTQ, have participated in past private placements in Genesis and now own a good portion of stock. In my mind, it’s a great indication of the potential value that the Chevrier Gold Project may have moving forward.

Favourable politics and world-class geology – for me, it doesn’t get much better than Quebec, as far as your investment buck goes!

 Chevrier Gold Project

Genesis’ 100% owned Chevrier Gold Project encompasses 275 square km and is located 35 km south of Chibougamau, Quebec, in the heart of the Abitibi Greenstone Belt. Chevrier straddles 15 km of the Fancamp deformation zone, and is 15 km northeast of IAMGOLD’s high-grade Monster Lake gold deposit.

NOTE: The IAMGOLD and Toma Gold Monster Lake JV released their maiden inferred resource of 433,300 ounces of gold at 12.14 g/t at a 3.5 g/t cut-off.

Chevrier Gold Project History

Prior to Genesis, the area in which the Chevrier deposit is located was owned and explored by Inmet Mining Inc. (Minnova), which, in 1989, was the first to drill the now Main Zone of Chevrier, where they intersected gold grading 5.4 g/t. The property was then purchased by Geonova Explorations, which outlined Chevrier’s Main Zone.

In 2007, the property changed owners once again, with Tawsho taking the reins. They went on to complete a 2,792 km aeromagnetic survey, a ground EM Time Domain survey, 24 diamond drill holes, an independent NI 43-101 resource estimate (by Met-Chem Canada Inc.), and a 5,000 ton bulk sample.

Since Genesis acquired Chevrier in Q2 of 2016, it has completed a long list of work which includes the inventory of more than 70,000 m of drill core, the re-sampling and re-assaying of selected mineralized intervals, re-sampling of 4 trenches, 3D modelling of Main, South and East Zones, 50+ km of IP surveying, and executed a 10,000 m drill program, which focused on confirming historical Geonova drill holes, exploration step out holes on the Main Zone Deposit and the exploration of other IP and geological targets. Results from this program can be found on Sedar.

New Geological Model

Over its 29 year history, Chevrier has seen 213 drill holes, totalling over 87,000 meters. However, the Genesis team is the first to consolidate, re-evaluate and form a comprehensive geological model regarding the Main Zone’s gold mineralization.

Below is an image of the mineralization within the Main Zone, using a 0.3 g/t Au grade shell.

Chevrier Gold Project – Plain View of the Main Zone Deposit

Chevrier Gold Project Resource Update

Using the new geological model and the compiled data from the most recent drill program, Genesis has released an updated resource for the Chevrier Gold Project. The updated resource includes the Main and East Zones and, as described in the previous section of the report, envisions a mining scenario in which there is both an open pit and underground workings.

Indicated Gold Resource – 395,000 ounces averaging 1.45 g/t

Inferred Gold Resource – 297,000 ounces averaging 1.33 g/t

NOTE: With a combined indicated and inferred resource of 692,000 ounces of gold, and with Genesis’ MCAP sitting below $10 million, this presents an interesting value proposition. Keep in mind, not all ounces are of equal value, but nonetheless, this is a good high-level indicator of value.

This is a great start for the Genesis team as, collectively, – indicated and inferred – they sit very close to 1 million ounces of gold in an area of the Abitibi which looks poised for development in the coming years. Clearly, the next move for the Genesis team is to expand this new resource, which will be aided by their newly formed strategic advisors team.

2019 and beyond should be very interesting for investors as they move forward.

Chevrier Resource Expansion

In terms of expanding the deposit, one of the best possibilities comes with drilling deeper, as the Principal Zones remain open at depth.

updated long section

Chevrier Gold Project – Long Section of the Main Zone Deposit

To date, I believe there have only been a handful of holes drilled below 400m, each of which hit mineralization. Given the nature of many of the Abitibi gold deposits, such as Osisko Mining’s Windfall Lake Gold Project, there is certainly the potential for more ounces to be found at depth.

I look forward to the next drill program which will test the extent of the mineralization at depth, and will most certainly tackle the other high priority targets on the property.

Concluding Remarks

The new gold bull market may be upon us, owning undervalued junior gold companies, such as Genesis, could be highly advantageous in the weeks and months ahead.

Investing in junior resource companies is risky and, therefore, in my opinion, you need to seek out companies that are led by strong management teams, who can navigate the risk and propel the company forward.

Genesis Metals Corporation is a company which I am invested in and believe has the horsepower, in terms of the management team, to move the Chevrier Gold Project forward. Clearly, the company must focus on expanding the resource by drilling deeper and exploring the property’s high priority targets.

As outlined in my report, there is a strong list of advisors who have “been there and done that” within the resource sector, and I am confident will have a great influence on the direction of Genesis moving forward.

Summarizing my thesis for investment, here are what I think are a few of Genesis’ most compelling strengths:

  • A proven management team: Sundar, Fleming, Florek and Liboiron
  • Strategic Advisors: Discovery Group’s John Robbins and James Paterson, Dr. Robert Carpenter, Dr. Andrew Ramcharan, and Garrett Ainsworth.
  • Strategic Shareholders List Headlined by: Osisko Mining, Eric Sprott, Delbrook Capital, Gold 2000, US Global Investors, SIDEX/SDBJ/FTQ and Medalist Capital
  • Located in the 4th best jurisdiction in the world, Quebec
  • Systematic 2019 exploration program led by Vector Geological Solutions – high-grade gold targeting
  • Expanded land package with high exploration potential, Chevrier Gold Project and October Gold Project
  • Great bang for their drilling buck, as their all-in drill costs, thus far, have roughly averaged $220 per metre

Don’t want to miss a new investment idea, interview or financial product review? Become a Junior Stock Review VIP now – it’s FREE!

Until next time,

Brian Leni  P.Eng

Founder – Junior Stock Review

Disclaimer: The following is not an investment recommendation, it is an investment idea. I am not a certified investment professional, nor do I know you and your individual investment needs. Please perform your own due diligence to decide whether this is a company and sector that is best suited for your personal investment criteria. Currently, I do not own Genesis Metals Corporation stock. All Genesis Metals Corporation analytics were taken from their website and press release. Genesis Metals Corporation is a Sponsor of Junior Stock Review.

Posted on

A Conversation with Justin Tolman, Economic Geologist at Sprott Global Resource Investments

“Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day. Teach him to fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.”

An obsession with the “how” or “why” instead of the “what” is integral, in my opinion, to being successful in the world of investment. While the “how” can often be enough to make your eyes glaze over, it’s what ultimately separates the wheat from the chaff.

I believe the success I’ve had in my investing career, thus far, is due in large part to listening to and informally learning from successful investors within the sector.

Today, I’m sharing an interview I did with someone to which you should pay attention. It’s key to learning the “how” and the “why” of investment within the resource sector.

Justin Tolman is an economic geologist by trade and is a part of a world-class technical evaluation team at Sprott Global Resource Investments. In our conversation, we cover a number of topics including his background, jurisdictional risk, lessons learned in the sector and much more.

Enjoy!

Brian: You joined Sprott Global Resource Investments last year as an economic geologist within their technical team. The Sprott technical team is known throughout the sector as one of the best in the business and, thus, the mere fact that you joined them, in my view, speaks volumes about your technical acumen.

Can you give us an overview of your work history and how it brought you to where you are today with Sprott Global Resource Investments?

Justin: I have degrees in both economic geology and business, but I think more pertinently, I spent the last 20 years on the operating side of the resource world doing what I could do ensuring that mines were profitable, exploration was successful, deals were accretive, and that was tremendously rewarding. I got to go out sleeping under the stars looking for gold deposits for weeks at a time. And I’d work in big underground mines a mile under the earth. At the right time of the year, you don’t see the sun until the weekend. But I used to joke that all that time I was trying to work at what I wanted to be when I grew up. And the net result was that I got to have some great world-class mentors. I got to be molded in the crucible of some exciting discoveries. But I spent those two decades always looking to learn the next thing, find ways to add value.

Inadvertently, I ended up as this broad, renaissance geologist, which sort of primed me for the current role with Sprott, where a key part of the job is trying to identify top tier management teams or be earliest into new discoveries.

Brian: For me, jurisdictional risk is an interesting subject because everyone has their own criteria for what constitutes risk.  

A good example is Russia. Many jump to the conclusion that it’s a VERY risky country and, therefore, not a place to invest. I don’t necessarily disagree; most of the propaganda about Russia, today, is ‘negative.’

Let’s, however, consider one of the criteria listed by the Fraser Institute in its examination of jurisdictional risk; political stability. Relative to its peers, Russia scored low, which a lot of people translate to ‘stay away.’ While political stability is a complex factor, I was taken aback when a friend, whose company does business in Russia, said he finds this scoring comical; “does anyone really think there’s going to be some serious political upheaval while Putin is in charge?” Given the complexity of evaluating political stability, his answer isn’t complete, but it still reveals the contrast in views – those who have experience in these ‘risky’ jurisdictions, and those who rely solely on narrative to form their opinions.

How do you view jurisdictional risk and how does it tie into the investment analysis of a junior resource company?

Justin: Risk is a fascinating subject especially with resource investing. Jurisdictional risk obviously is nuanced, subjective and multi-faceted, not only for people on the outside trying to evaluate it, Also for those teams who find themselves operating across different cultures and borders. Obviously, jurisdictional risk is one element that goes into a risk matrix. It’s a foundational element, and it’s one that even the best teams can only ever have limited influence over. But, like other types of risk, it can be mitigated, and the reality is some groups will be better at forecasting probable outcomes. Some teams will be better at operating in certain environments.

Personally, I can be quite risk tolerant with respect to jurisdiction. I can justify investments in comparatively risky locations. The caveat is that the returns have to be sufficient to warrant it. If you look at somewhere like the DRC, global risk consultants consistently and quite rightly rank it as having very high political and operational risks. But committed, in country exploration continues to highlight an emerging camp of world-class copper mines.  That sets up an interesting dynamic.

As a final comment, you need to be quite judicious in applying broad risk categories to entire jurisdictions, whether it’s countries or provinces, the reality is that often it depends. Some superficially low risk places for mining investment, like Peru, in actuality can be a very complex patchwork of attractiveness depending on local community attitudes, legacy issues, and a host of other things. That’s one of the things that we like to think differentiates us at Sprott we get out on the ground in these areas early and develop a deeper understanding for this aspect. A big part of my job is spending time on the ground at lots of these projects first-hand.

Brian: In my view, current market sentiment is about as bad as I have seen it within the resource sector. Many of the emails I have received in the last month, or so, ask my opinion on where the market is headed or if they should follow the adage, “sell in May and go away.”

In your opinion, are investors wasting their time worrying about the direction of the market?

Justin: My opinion is that investors should absolutely be aware of where they are in a cyclical market. You should be allocating some of your brain capacity curating an opinion or seeking trusted advice on the direction of the market. Unquestionably, there’s value to be unlocked for those who can position themselves accordingly. But honestly, it’s not something I worry about on a day-to-day basis. Instead, one of the things that we do as part of the technical diligence team is to identify companies and assets that will be able to operate profitably or attract capital at any point in a price cycle, good or bad. And this way clients can anchor their portfolios around quality and the market will do what it wants.

Brian: Are market sentiment and fundamentals like the chicken and the egg? Meaning, does it make a difference which one comes first to alter the tide from a bear to bull market?

Justin: That’s a great question. I suspect those two elements certainly exert some influence over each other. The trick would be to extricate the relative proportions of each at any given point in time. But to borrow from one of the mental models of Warren Buffet and Charlie Munger, I feel we may have drifted outside my circle of competence at that this point. I just let the market do as its want. Instead, I try to start with an estimate of an asset’s fundamental value, and then if you are able to identify where market sentiment has drifted a long way from that starting point, it helps to guide future decisions from there. I’d much rather look at a tree than the forest sometimes.

Brian: In my opinion, exploration companies are a great way to speculate within the junior resource sector, especially during a bear market, as discovery pays no matter where you are in the market cycle.

While I see the chance for high returns, it definitely comes with high risk, as the odds of finding an economic deposit are stacked against you.

Firstly, do you agree with my statement regarding speculation in exploration companies in bear markets? Secondly, in your view, what are the most important steps or criteria in evaluating an exploration company and its probability of success?

Justin: Great question, and it might not be a short answer. Instead, I might tweak that statement to read, “Speculating in the best exploration companies at the right time in a project’s life cycle can provide outsized returns no matter where you are in the market.” It might be self-evident, I guess, but not all exploration companies are created equal. Most hemorrhage money on ineffective or inefficient exploration. So as you allude to in the second part of your question, the trick is identifying those companies with the greatest probability of success. And you have to layer over that looking at those groups who also show good financial acumen. Corporately, can they attract funding for their ideas? Are they going to be good stewards of capital? So it always starts with management. Are they ethical? Are they motivated? Can they build social license? And then need to look at their experience in the deposit style, project stage and  region that they’re operating in? Do they know what a mine looks like? Another way of saying this is “do they know when to cut bait and move to the next target or do they fall in love with their projects?”

Pre-discovery, it’s important to have an appreciation for the region and the type of deposit for which the company is exploring: its geology, its prospectivity, the maturity of the region. And when you zoom in to the project scale, the list of diligence criteria multiplies again. As they progress into drilling, can it have sufficient size to be material to someone? How will it be mined? What process will be required to recover the minerals of value?

At the end of the day, if you can’t recover something economically, your discovery becomes moot, and it gets relegated to a technical success, the trick is recognizing this as early as you can. For those people who can see that ahead of others, there’s a huge advantage there.

Brian: Recently, Irving Resources released their first drill results from their Omu Gold Project in Japan. Irving is targeting a low sulphidation epithermal system, which they have systematically identified over the course of the last couple of years.

The initial results are very interesting as it appears to me that they have discovered, on their 2nd hole, the upper portion of the boiling zone. The market responded very well to these results, but it is clear that more drilling is needed to better understand and identify the main source of the hydrothermal system.

Why is it important to identify the boiling zone within a low sulphidation epithermal deposit?

Justin: Boiling in low sulphidation epithermals is a powerful and complex mechanism. It’s associated with a drop in the temperature and the pressure of the system. And this in turn causes a bunch of gasses to escape. It changes the pH a little. But most importantly from our point of view, it causes precious metals like gold and silver to drop out of solution and be deposited locally. So that’s a lot of words to say that for this type of deposit, if there was gold available in the system, this is where it would be concentrated.

BrianGenerally speaking in regards to a system such as this, moving forward, what does failure look like?

Justin: We’ve obviously been in a bear market the last few years when the question is phrased as what does failure look like rather than the other way around. The sinter which marks the target area in this case is comparatively large, and the drilling’s at a very early stage still. So the company is looking for a blind feeder at depth underneath this sinter. ‘Blind,’ here, is in the sense that they don’t know exactly where this is located under the alteration. They’re kind of poking holes in there trying to vector. Now they have some indications that the boiling zone is deep. They have indications that it could be auriferous because they have a thin hit from just their second hole on the property, which is a solid start.

In this case, exploration is an iterative process. You need to be looking at each drill result and the geology successively to help you vector in three dimensions. These systems, generally, here have a well-established zonation and you can play a game of ‘Warmer-Colder’. Failure could happen by degrees as the available space for an economic deposit progressively gets whittled away hole by hole. Success could happen all at once. This is a good example of one of the things that we actively monitor as a program progresses to help us develop our own opinions on prospectivity.

For those interested in getting a better feel for Omu or projects like this, my colleague, Andrew Jackson, was on site late last year. Some photos from that site visit and many of our others are just available now at SprottUSA.com.  We’re trying something new and making images from our field work available on this platform with some commentary. For those interested, that’s an easy way to track the things we’re looking at in-house from a technical perspective.

Brian: Continuing with the exploration theme, last year, Evrim Resources’ Cuale project was in the headlines for the discovery of what many thought had the potential to be an economic deposit. This was not the case, however, as the ultimate ground truthing mechanism – the drill, delivered dusters at depth.

In your view, can investors learn anything from this failure?

Justin: There’s always lessons from failure, often more contextual and more painful ones than from success, right?

Brian: Very true.

Justin: At the outset, there was no way to know categorically what the drilling would show. Now, Cuale was an atypical gold system in many respects. There are absolutely learnings available there, technically and geologically, for example, the difference between a hand dug trench versus a mechanical trench and how that affects where you can sample within the regolith profile, but it’s not always straightforward. Remember, Evrim had a whole bunch of major mining companies on site who looked at those rocks and were also excited by the potential.

So I think for investors, which is what you asked, a key lesson here is to take profits. Selling when a stock is going up can be hard psychologically sometimes. It’s easy for emotion and the innate tendency to project recent trends forward, and that can overcome prudence. But taking some money off the table at key junctures is often wise.

Cuale didn’t live up to expectations.  However, I think the company itself is well financed and doing quality work with credible partners.

Brian: Conferences are a great way to expand your knowledge of the sector and to speak to the people who are running the companies in which you’re investing. Personally, I think it is of the utmost importance to try and learn who these people are – you’re trusting them with your money.  

For those looking for a conference to attend, I highly suggest that you attend the Sprott Natural Resource Symposium from July 30th to August 2nd, in Vancouver. 

In your opinion, what’s the value proposition of the Sprott Natural Resource Symposium?

Justin: I attend lots of different mining and investment conferences, Brian. And each of them fills a niche within the broad arc of the industry. The Sprott Symposium distinguishes itself I think by providing quality content for investors in the natural resource space. Service providers need not apply. It’s relevant to Corporate Development teams or pure explorers, but they’re not the target audience, investors are.

The presenting companies have to be both invited and owned in-house. The guest speakers and the panel members are top notch in their fields. There’s a good balance of macro and project dynamics.

The conference itself is structured so that those presenting and those being presented to have more chances to interact, which I think lets delegates explore areas of interest to them beyond the typical investor relations pitch. The culmination of this means that the caliber of the conference participant that it attracts is actually extremely high. I get as much from talking to the other delegates as I sometimes do talking to the presenters. I always leave that symposium wiser than when I arrived.




Don’t want to miss a new investment idea, interview or financial product review? Become a Junior Stock Review VIP now – it’s FREE!


Until next time,

Brian Leni  P.Eng

Founder – Junior Stock Review

Disclaimer: The following is not an investment recommendation, it is an investment idea. I am not a certified investment professional, nor do I know you and your individual investment needs. Please perform your own due diligence to decide whether this is a company and sector that is best suited for your personal investment criteria. I do OWN shares in Irving Resources and Evrim Resources. I have NO business relationship with any of the companies discussed in this interview.

Posted on

A Conversation with Mark O’Dea, Chairman and Founder of Oxygen Capital

The junior resource sector is a people business. In my view, making money consistently in a sector which is fraught with risk and failure, without a doubt, is inextricably linked to the quality of the people who are running the companies with which I am investing.

This statement, and statements like it, are very likely the most common answers you will hear from many pundits throughout the industry.  While this should now be common knowledge, however, I still hear from investors who invest and lose money with “butchers, bakers and candlestick makers.”

So, why does this still happen? I’m not totally sure. Maybe it’s the potential for a quick buck or simply investors caught up in a narrative.  Whatever the answer may be, I’m sure it will continue in the future, and that’s too bad. While it makes a select few rich, overall, the promotion of mediocrity is really bad for the sector.

In saying this, today I have for you a conversation with one of the sector’s ‘greats;’ a man and a group in which it’s worth investing.

This person is Dr. Mark O’Dea, Chairman and Founder of Oxygen Capital.

Oxygen Capital has a great track record of success within the sector, as they have provided a ton of value for their shareholders through the sale of many of their projects, such as Fronteer Gold, Aurora Energy and True Gold.

In our conversation, I asked O’Dea about the secret behind Oxygen Capital’s success, lessons he’s learned while working in the sector, his view of jurisdictional risk and more.

There’s a lot to glean from O’Dea’s answers – Enjoy!

Brian: In my opinion, one of the biggest issues facing most people is their lack of self-awareness. Whether it be in their investments or their personal lives, many people either have no idea or are prone to lying to themselves about where they are strong and where they are weak and, thus, typically fall short of their goals and aspirations.

Oxygen Capital and its managing partners definitely don’t have this issue, as their track record for success within the resource sector is among the best I have seen.

What has and continues to make Oxygen Capital successful within the resource sector?

Mark: When you start working on a project, you know reasonably soon, whether it has the potential to be an economic deposit or not, and if it doesn’t, there’s really no point in faking it.  It’s a waste of time, it destroys the trust of shareholders, and it builds the wrong type of working culture.  So, you’re much better off focusing your efforts on finding the right project.  We have lived by the philosophy of “good projects and good places” for 20 years now and it has worked out really, really well.

Over that period, I’ve been CEO and/or Executive Chairman of a number of public companies that have been acquired, because they were underpinned by projects that were either operating mines, or advanced projects that could ultimately become mines.

For example, Fronteer Gold, among other things, had the high grade Long Canyon deposit that ultimately became a mine built by Newmont, after they acquired Fronteer in 2011.  It is now one of their lowest cost mines in the USA.  Aurora Energy defined and advanced one of the largest uranium deposits in Canada back in 2009, and it was ultimately acquired by Paladin in 2011.  Its Michelin deposit needs higher Uranium prices, but it’s got all the attributes of a long life mine.  And most recently, at True Gold, we built an open-pit, heap leach gold mine in West Africa, and shortly after we poured our first gold bar in 2016, we were acquired by Endeavour Mining.  So, all of our big successes have been underpinned by high quality projects that were either mines or had the potential to become mines.  

Today, we’ve got four companies at Oxygen – Pure Gold, Liberty Gold, Sun Metals and Discovery Metals. We’ve created, in my view, one of the best exploration and development pipelines in the business.  And all of our companies continue to be underpinned by good projects, in good places.  At Pure Gold, we have the large Madsen Gold Deposit in Red Lake Ontario, which is currently the highest grade gold development project in Canada today.  We just finished a bankable feasibility study that’s underpinned by a two million ounce indicated resource, at almost nine grams per ton, with another half million ounces of inferred gold.  It’s going through the final permitting process and ultimately the goal is to become the next Canadian producer. 

Liberty is rapidly advancing three big open pit gold projects in the Great Basin of the United States.  They’re excellent projects in a Tier 1 jurisdiction.  We recently put out a PEA on Gold Strike and it shows that it’s got the makings of an excellent low cost mine.  It’s very appealing.  And we’re about to start drilling Black Pine, which is another big Carlin-style gold system that has exciting size potential.

Finally, Sun Metals, we just made a highly disruptive discovery in BC, which was frankly, one of the best high grade copper-gold intercepts in Canada in 2018.  We’re about to get back in there this summer and continue drilling to build continuity and size.  We are all very excited.  So, all of our businesses are underpinned by real projects and that’s been the key to our success.


Brian: Over the course of my life, I have learned that a large portion of what it takes to be successful is not being afraid of failure. The caveat being that it doesn’t pay to be irrationally courageous, either.

Firstly, do you agree? Secondly, can you give an example, in terms of your personal resource sector career, of how you used this philosophy to overcome adversity and be successful?

Mark: I would agree with both points, this business is like a treasure hunt, and you know you’re going to make a lot of wrong turns, and hit a lot of dead ends along the way. But when you persevere and ultimately get to the prize, the reward can be spectacular for everyone, and it’s worth it.

We look at dozens and dozens of projects every year, and the key is to know, A, what makes a good project, and those are things like grade, size, strip ratio, metallurgy, all those kinds of things. The second is knowing when to keep going and when to stop.

In my opinion, it is perfectly fine and, in fact, preferable to cut your losses and move on, if your project isn’t shaping up into something meaningful. So, maybe the metallurgy is fatal, or the strip ratio is too high, or the grade is too low, or maybe you just got the geology all wrong. Whatever the reason, failure is part of this business and winning teams in my opinion need to be able to try and fail and quickly move on to a better project.  That’s what investors expect of you. 

Brian: For me, jurisdictional risk is an interesting subject because everyone has their own criteria for what constitutes risk. For most, jurisdictional risk is most closely tied to the politics of the country in question, or the politics of a neighbouring country.

Over the course of your career, you have worked in and run mining companies in a variety of different countries around the world. These countries range from premier jurisdictions, like Canada and the United States, to some of the more difficult places, like Burkina Faso and Turkey. How have these experiences shaped the way you view jurisdictional risk?

Mark: In my view, risk comes in many forms and I put risk in two categories. One is subterranean risk. Everything below the ground, and the other is above ground risk. And so, 50 years ago in our sector, all the risk associated with mining was subterranean and related to the deposit itself. Did it have the grade and the size or not? And today, all those subterranean risks are still there, to the exact same extent, but layered on top of it all are the above ground risks. Which are, in many ways, far more challenging, because they’re difficult to manage and they can take a lot of time.

I’m talking about things like regulatory, permitting, social, and geo political risk, and mining is under increased scrutiny today.  Regardless of the jurisdiction you’re in these days, each jurisdiction has its challenges, whether it’s from local communities or an environmental group. 

From day one, your project needs to be positioned in a way that benefits the local community, regardless of where you are. And that means employment, a better way of life and environmental protection, and if you get these three correct right out of the gate, then you are at least increasing your chances of success down the road.

Brian: At the moment, bearish sentiment within the resource sector appears to be very prevalent. As a consequence, many of the junior companies that I have spoken to are finding it very hard to raise cash to further develop their projects.

Oxygen Capital companies have a great reputation when it comes to their ability to raise cash. First, how is it that Oxygen companies are able to raise cash in difficult markets and, second, in your opinion, why is the junior resource sector on a whole, seemingly, having a hard time attracting investment capital?

Mark: Since 2013, we’ve been in a bear market; gold spiked at US$1890 /oz in 2012, and then we’ve been bumping along in the US$1200s to US$1300 range for about six years now.  And, during this period, there have been some pretty massive structural changes, with traditional funding having exited the space and dried up.  ETF flows have stolen liquidity, and passive money is taken over from active money. During this period, we’ve been able to stick to our knitting and we’ve been focused on buying, exploring and advancing great projects in great places, and building our pipeline.  Our businesses have been able to grow in this bear market because we’ve been able to attract some of the best investors and name brand backers in the sector, and I’m extremely thankful for their support in backing our companies.  Since 2012, we’ve raised about $500 million dollars in 30 finances.  And that includes the CapEx to build the Karma open-pit mine in Burkina Faso.

The biggest challenge to raising new capital today is the decimation of actively managed resource funds.  These funds kept the ecosystem going for decades and most of that capital has now migrated into passively managed ETFs, which don’t participate in financings.  It has also shifted into other speculative industries, which hasn’t helped.  But I do fundamentally believe, that the relevance and approval of the sector is going to have a renaissance as the demand for green technologies puts a bigger and bigger focus on the need for metals in our modern lives. 

Brian: Having attended many resource sector focused investment conferences over the years, it’s clear, to me at least, that the majority of investors in the sector are in their, so-to-speak, ‘golden years.’ The younger generations, mainly the millennials, on mass, are virtually absent, with their attention seemingly more focused on cannabis and crypto. The question that comes to my mind is, why? Is it a matter of relatability?

In your opinion, why has the resource sector failed to attract the millennial generation’s investment dollars, thus far?

Mark: I think that is an important question, but I’m not sure we’re getting the answer right.
The broader market has been booming, other sectors have been on fire and generating great returns, in sectors that are more topical and, frankly, cooler.  In contrast, you look at the mining space and the equities have been going down for eight years, so there hasn’t been an opportunity for them to make any money.  So, they’ve been staying away and that’s one answer.

The other answer, I think there’s a cognitive dissonance between understanding the role of mining in propelling a greener, more sustainable society.  That vision requires metals. And, ultimately, I think a connection needs to be made by people, who are embracing electric vehicles, wind turbines, solar panels, and recognize that they all require metals. Lots of metal, which can be extracted without destroying the environment. 

As an example, Tesla just published an article today saying there’s not going to be enough metal to supply the electric vehicle demand that’s anticipated. And that’s all copper, cobalt, nickel, etc,. What end consumers and investors need to realize is that, mining and environmentalism are all part of the same continuum. We’re all on the same team. And people can feel good about extracting metals from the ground, to build a sustainable greener future, while still protecting the environment. It all needs to be able to coexist as part of the same ecosystem.

Brian: Within Oxygen, you tend to focus on de-risked projects as part of your ethos. A great example of an advanced de-risked project would be the Madsen Red Lake Gold Mine, which is owned by Pure Gold, in Red Lake, Ontario. Red Lake is a prolific district.

What are your reasons for focusing on gold right now and what do you see as a future for Red Lake?

Mark: Almost all of our success as a group comes from projects that have been worked on in the past and we have effectively “rediscovered” them.  We can include the Michelin Project that Aurora had, Goldstrike and Black Pine at Liberty Gold, Karma at True Gold, Long Canyon at Fronteer Gold and Madsen at Pure Gold.   These were all past producing mines or previous exploration projects that were forgotten and put away for various reasons including low metal prices or changes to corporate direction.  


Madsen is a perfect example to highlight.  This was a past producing mine for 38 years, it produced 2.5 million ounces of gold and effectively lay dormant for 20 years, owned by the predecessor company Claude Resources, who worked on it intermittently, but never advanced it to the stage of developing a new geological understanding and getting it back into production.

Pure Gold picked it up in 2014, and consolidated the property for a net cost of $8.7 million dollars and the team has focused on re-interpreting, compiling, integrating, every bit of data they could for two years on this project. We came up with a new geological model and the Company is now sitting on the highest grade development gold project in Canada, with a million ounces of reserves, drilled off at six-and-half meter centers, and sitting within a 2.1 million ounce indicated resource with another half million ounces of inferred resource.  It’s an extraordinary accomplishment and these are all new ounces. This is not a remnant project that we’re going to go in and salvage. These are brand new ounces sitting outside of historical development. So, that’s a pretty important fact to include in there.

Madsen, even though it’s evolved from a historical legacy project, it is actually a big part of the future of Red Lake. It’s a sunrise asset today. We’re about to move through the final permitting process and into production with a high grade gold reserve of one million ounces, with the potential to provide decades of production in Red Lake.  Meanwhile, the Red Lake mine complex itself is a sunset asset and it’s starting to wane. So, I think Madsen is going to be a very, very important component of the whole consolidated Red Lake package.

Brian: In my opinion, distinguishing if management teams are owners or if they are solely employees is integral to understanding the motivation the team has to succeed. Not only is it integral to understand how much of the company insiders own, but at what price.

How important do you think it is that management own shares in their own companies?

Mark: I think it’s vital, I think it’s one of the most important things that a shareholder should look at, when they invest in a company. How much skin in the game does the management have? There’s a massive difference between being an employee and being an owner. Being an owner of your company, through owning a significant portion of shares, is a really strong testament to your dedication and your focus on making it a successful venture. For example, at Pure Gold, we recently had five year options that were about to expire last month and everybody in the group, all the board and senior management, exercised those options and held the stock, adding three million shares of insider ownership to the books. 

One of the things I have learned over the years is that when you have a project that you truly believe in, own as much of it as possible.  I’m one of the largest shareholders in each of the oxygen companies, and have been regularly adding to my position at Pure Gold and Liberty Gold. 

Brian: Mark, it has been a pleasure. Thank you very much for sharing your thoughts on the resource sector and, most importantly, educating us on the Oxygen Capital group of companies.

Before we end, do you have any final thoughts or advice for resource sector investors in 2019 and beyond?

Mark: I will leave you with a quote from Miles Davis, who knew what he was talking about when it came to jazz when he said,

“Time is not the main thing. It’s the only thing.”

He wasn’t talking about mining, obviously, he was talking about music. But I think it is equally applicable to the mining sectors.

In this business or any cyclical business, if you get the timing right, the results can be spectacular, beautiful. And to me, it feels very much like the timing is right for the resource stocks to resurface and breakout from this bear market in the very near term.

Don’t want to miss a new investment idea, interview or financial product review? Become a Junior Stock Review VIP now – it’s FREE!

Until next time,

Brian Leni  P.Eng

Founder – Junior Stock Review

Disclaimer: The following is not an investment recommendation, it is an investment idea. I am not a certified investment professional, nor do I know you and your individual investment needs. Please perform your own due diligence to decide whether this is a company and sector that is best suited for your personal investment criteria. I do NOT own shares in any of the companies discussed in the interview. I have NO business relationship with Oxygen Capital or any of its associated companies.

Posted on

Sell in May and Go Away?

Copper ore being dumped at Nugget Pond

For those who didn’t catch my last newsletter, I have been travelling in Asia, specifically Singapore and Hong Kong. In Singapore, I attended and spoke at Mining Investment Asia and, in Hong Kong, I attend Mines and Money Asia.

The trip was fantastic, I’m eagerly awaiting my next trip to east Asia!

More specifics on my trip in the coming weeks, but for now, some thoughts on the market and what I am buying at the moment.

Enjoy!

Thoughts on the Market

Over the last month, readers have continued to ask me where I think the junior resource market is headed and if I think that the adage, “sell in May and go away,” is the mantra that investors should use in 2019.

Firstly, where do I think the junior resource market is headed? Simply, I don’t know, no one does. The stock market is a complex beast with many factors affecting its direction. However, I know that isn’t necessarily the answer most of you are looking for, so I will add some colour, purely for fun and entertainment.

I continue to believe that gold is a must-have insurance policy, because it appears to me that things are only becoming more complex within the global economy. In my opinion, gold remains the best way to protect your wealth as we head toward major monetary changes in the future.

I will add to this; I view a rising gold price with trepidation because, to me, this is signalling a growing uncertainty within the world, pushing us closer to this major change. I believe you must ask yourself, ‘what does the world look like if the gold price is US$10,000 per ounce?’ My guess is, ‘not good.’

In terms of the base metals, I continue to be long-term bullish on their demand as the human race continues to consume goods at an ever-increasing rate. Further increases in demand, however, don’t necessarily mean that the price of the base metals will go up.

If I were to pick a metal that I believe has a good chance of going up in price, it’s nickel. There are a number of reasons why I believe this could happen and, if you want to hear them, please check out my presentation from this year’s VRIC. If you have more in-depth questions, let me know.

Now, for the junior resource companies; for those who have listened to or read my work previously, you will know that I don’t invest in junior companies because the price of the underlying commodity with which the company is exploring is going higher.

By following a mantra like this, it forces you to stick with the best of the best companies and, thus, protects your downside risk. If your stock picks rely on a rising metal price, I assure you it’s only a matter of time until you lose money, because no one can predict where metal prices are headed with any consistency.

Sell in May and go away? Personally, I don’t put much stock into seasonality type theories like this and stick to fundamental analysis to determine my buys and sells in the market. In the long term, I think the vast majority of investors would be much more successful if they ignored market commentary such as this, as again, who can predict the future with any consistency?

Second to that, while many of the junior resource company share prices have fallen over the last year or so, there are many which have stock charts that reflect a much brighter story. The companies which have bucked the trend in most cases are exploration companies, because discovery pays no matter where you are in the cycle.

Additionally, there are some stories which are run by some very talented management teams, and the cream always rises to the top!

Companies I am Buying

Irving Resources (IRV:CSE)

I mentioned Irving in my tax loss buying / 2018 year in review article in December. Irving is 1 of 2 junior companies exploring for gold in Japan and, at the moment, have the drills turning at their highly prospective Omu Gold Project in Hokkaido.

The stock price has doubled since December as a function of the build up for drill results and with the newly announced strategic financing by Newmont. Additionally, Irving has released pictures of the drill core from their first 2 holes.

Along with the pictures they have provided some explanations of what they are seeing in terms of alteration in the drill core, thus far. Check out their webpage for more details.

Personally, I’m really encouraged by what I have seen, especially the results from hole #2, which appears to have hit the top portion of the boiling zone of this low sulphidation epithermal target.

Is it a buy here? I think it depends on your risk tolerance.  Currently, the MCAP is sitting around $100 million, with a portion of that value being derived by the gold they have in the ground in the form of the past producing underground mine within the Omu property.

Besides that, the valuation, from what I can tell, is solely based on the speculative upside potential in this low sulphidation target they are drilling at Omu which, I think, at this point, is warranted.

I bought more stock around $1.70 when I saw the news release with the core photos because I thought they looked very similar to the Hisikari core photos which I had looked at months ago.

For perspective, Newmont bought in at $2.20 a share, but given the size of Newmont and their outlook for what Omu might mean to them in the future, the entry share price isn’t necessarily their primary concern.

For individual investors, however, it can mean a lot, as a miss on the first drill results and the share price will likely be cut in half, especially in this market. In saying this, I believe Irving will give me multiple kicks at the can, even if these first assays don’t return good results.

For those with a healthy appetite for risk, therefore, the current price really isn’t that bad given what the upside potential may be. I, however, would be more comfortable looking for an entry price below $1.90.

Drill core has to be sent offshore for assay, therefore, we are still 4 to 6 weeks away from results, and with this in mind, there may be a chance of weakness in the share price.

FPX Nickel Corp. (FPX:TSXV)

The best bang for your buck in terms of nickel juniors out there. Current share price is at $0.12, and considering the metallurgical optimization on the project and a fantastic solution to their debt issue, there is deep value here.

Check out my articles and presentations to see why I believe the future is bright for FPX.

https://www.juniorstockreview.com/2019/03/18/fpx-nickel-corp-update-on-the-baptiste-deposit-metallurgy/
https://www.juniorstockreview.com/2019/02/08/nickel-a-short-and-long-term-outlook/
https://www.juniorstockreview.com/2018/01/08/fpx-nickel-corp-undervalued-pure-nickel-play/

Maritime Resources (MAE:TSXV)

I was an investor in Anaconda Mining for a long time and believed that the proposed merger of the 2 companies last year would have been fantastic for both sets of investors. That, however, didn’t happen for a number of reasons.

Today, Maritime is under new management and appears to be progressing in the right direction in terms of moving its Hammerdown project toward production.

Recently, they raised more than $6 million dollars at $0.10 toward the development of Hammerdown, with both infill and exploration drilling in the plans.

In October 2017, I was able to visit Rambler Mining’s Nugget Pond mill, which, in Hammerdown’s PFS, is the site for processing its ore (under a tolling agreement). Having seen Nugget Pond’s gold circuit, I can attest to it not being a turn-key operation. Money will need to be spent to bring the gold processing equipment back up to operational condition.

Personally, and this is complete speculation on my part, I think it’s more likely that we will see another attempt at the merging of Anaconda and Maritime.

Appreciation in the share price of Maritime could be a major catalyst for talks, as a merger of roughly equals may be an easier sell to Maritime shareholders this time around.

I was a buyer at $0.09 and see a lot of expansion potential at Hammerdown, with the added bonus, in my mind, that there could be a strategic merger in the future.

Commander Resources (CMD:TSXV)

In my decision to invest in Maritime, I came across the fact that Commander owns a royalty on Hammerdown, which, in my estimation, is worth a few multiples of Commander’s currently paltry MCAP.  Keep in mind that without Hammerdown going to production, the royalty is worth nothing.

In addition, if you dig further into Commander, you will see that they have equity positions in both Maritime Resource and Aston Bay. Collectively, these positions, last I checked, were worth around $800K.

Last spring, Commander completed a $2.5 million financing, which has been burned down to $1.5 million as of PDAC.

At the moment, therefore, you can almost buy Commander for the value of their cash and equity positions, mix in the potential of the Maritime royalty and your downside potential is minimal, in my opinion.

I was a buyer at $0.095.

Aethon Minerals (AET:TSXV)

Currently, Aethon’s MCAP is roughly around their cash value. With news on the horizon, I think there are good things to come for Aethon.

Concluding Remarks

While the majority of investors might decide that they know where the market is headed and sell in May, I’m happily buying companies that are selling for less than their value, and have catalysts towards price appreciation.

A few good articles are coming your way in the coming weeks, stay tuned!

Until next time,

Brian Leni  P.Eng

Founder – Junior Stock Review

Disclaimer: The following is not an investment recommendation, it is an investment idea. I am not a certified investment professional, nor do I know you and your individual investment needs. Please perform your own due diligence to decide whether this is a company and sector that is best suited for your personal investment criteria. I do own FPX Nickel Corp., Irving Resources, Maritime Resources, Commander Resources, and Aethon Minerals stock. I have NO business relationship with of the companies mentioned in this article.