Posted on

2017 Vancouver Resource Investment Conference – January 22 to 23 2017

Ready to take your due diligence skills to the next level? Conferences are a great way to do just that. Junior companies are built upon the strength of their people, and meeting these people in person is the best way to judge just who it is that you’re speculating in.

I attended the Vancouver Resource Investment Conference (VRIC), sponsored by Katusa Research and Cambridge House, the weekend of January 22 and 23. The VRIC was an opportunity to learn from some of the best in the business, as they broke down the current trends in the market and explained where it is that they feel we’re headed in the weeks and months ahead.

Vancouver Convention Center

 

The conference was held at the Vancouver Convention Centre, where there were 4 workshop stages and 1 main stage for company presentations and speeches from the likes of Doug Casey, Marin Katusa, Brent Cook, Tommy Humphreys, and James Kwantes, just to name a few. There were some insightful discussions among the panel members, and some interesting company stories.

Having never attended a Cambridge event before, I can’t compare the attendance to previous years, however, some repeat conference goers did tell me that this appeared to be the best attendance in years. I take this as a great sign that we are early into a bull market, with a ton of upside potential as the junior resource sector starts to becomes sexy again.

Here are a few highlights from the event:

 

Words of Wisdom from Casey

Doug Casey, Founder of Casey Research and legendary speculator, was inducted into the Cambridge House Hall of Fame at this year’s event. The ceremony consisted of a classic Casey acceptance speech and a Casey roast, performed by Marin Katusa, Frank Guistra and Frank Holmes.

Here are some of the highlights from the 4 speeches Casey gave at this year’s conference:

  • Buy the best – Now, this may seem like an obvious statement, but what I think he means is take your time and do your due diligence – know what you’re buying.
  • Be patient – The junior market is highly volatile; don’t be sucked into emotional buying and chase a stock price that is rising quickly. You can’t, so to speak, kiss all of the girls; there will either be other opportunities or you will have a chance to buy the stock at a reduced price in the future.
  • We are exiting the eye of the storm, things are going to get rocky. Casey believes that we are headed toward further turmoil, the intensity of which, he predicts, will be worse than 2008.
  • Internationalization for yourself and your assets – this entails acquiring additional passports through residency (Argentina is his favourite). Buy international real estate, it can’t be repatriated
  • Hold your savings in gold – the smaller the physical size of the coin or bar the better, because they blend in with other coinage quite easily.
  • China, not Russia, could be the country that the United States has issues with in the future – Casey believes that President Trump will be able to find common ground with Putin, while China could prove to be much harder to deal with.
  • Doug’s Picks: Northern Dynasty (NDM – TSX) and Uranium Energy Corporation (UEC – NYSE). Marin offered a third pick: Blackbird Energy (BBI – TSXV)
  • Buy in tranches – the junior sector is volatile, buying in tranches allows you to dollar cost average your position
  • Keep a store of cash ready for a rainy day – the volatility in the sector provides buying opportunities, you need cash to deploy when opportunity knocks
  • Recommended Brent Cook’s newsletter, Exploration Insights. I second that recommendation!

 

Newsletter Writer Panel

An interesting panel that was held on the last day of the conference was the Newsletter writer panel, which included Louis James (Casey Research), Brent Cook (Exploration Insights), Frank Curzio (Curzio Research), Benj Gallander (Contra Herd Investment Letter),and was moderated by Marin Katusa (Katusa Research).

Katusa asked the panel a number of questions, including: Top pick, advice for subscribers, and what sets them apart from other newsletter writers. Here is a summary of the notes I took from what Brent and Louis had to say; this isn’t verbatim and only reflects my understanding of what was said:

 

Brent Cook

  • Top Pick – Mirasol Resources (MRZ:TSXV)
  • When a company story changes and your thesis now relies on hope, you are in trouble and need to sell
  • Limit portfolio size to no more than 20. It isn’t possible to follow more than 20 companies and still perform the proper due diligence
  • Cook is an economic geologist; this is what sets him apart
  • His passion is discovery and exploration companies are his speciality
  • He’s partnered with Joe Mazumdar who is an economic geologist and analyst. Previously, Mazumdar has worked at Haywood Securities and Canaccord Genuity as a senior analyst.

Louis James

  • Top Pick – Pretium Resources (PVG:TSX)
  • Do more due diligence, put boots on the ground and visit the company properties
  • Don’t rush into buying a stock, the junior market is volatile and will most likely come back to you
  • Find the fatal flaw of the company, there is always one (this echoes Exploration Insights’ Fatal Flaw Article that’s available on their website – a must read!)
  • If you read a news release and you don’t know how it will affect the company, it’s a sign you probably have too many companies in your portfolio
  • Louis’ boots on the ground approach sets him apart from the crowd
  • Louis is very passionate about his work and takes his responsibility to his subscribers to heart, feeling each win and loss

 

Quants

Frank Holmes, CEO and Chief Investment Officer of U.S. Global Investors, opened the VRIC speeches early on Sunday morning to a packed crowd. His presentation was on the changing world of market investment.  U.S. Global is an investment manager, who specializes in precious metals, natural resources and emerging markets. Holmes remarked that they have seen a drop in the amount of money flowing through their funds, yet the stocks their funds follow are still rising. Through his research to determine how money was alternatively flowing into these investments, he found Quants.

Quants uses artificial intelligence or algorithms to examine markets and companies. This data mining is then used to adjust cash flows into the companies that fit the specific criteria.  The algorithm criteria can be companies with low General and Administrative costs to Profits, or the algorithm will buy and sell related to sentiment, scanning news for specific words and phrases.

The use of artificial intelligence certainly isn’t new to the financial markets, as high frequency traders use similar algorithms to control their trading, going in and out of stocks in fractions of a second. Interestingly, remembering back to May 6, 2010, the NYSE was hit with a flash crash, which was traced back to the HFT algorithms that all decided to sell at the same time. Here is a useful link to the SEC report.

The fact is, these algorithms are designed by some very smart people, who are graduates of a handful of universities. This commonality in teaching no doubt leads to similar thinking patterns and, therefore, similarities in algorithm design, which means they come to the same conclusions relatively quickly.

In the end, I’m not entirely sure about Holmes’ conclusion, but I would hazard a guess that he’s pointing out the complexity and ever-changing nature of the financial markets.

 

An Investment Conference in Your Pocket – CEO.ca

Tommy Humphreys, founder of CEO.ca, gave a great speech on day 1 of the conference. Among other things, he outlined how you can access an investment conference, like the VRIC, every day through your phone.

For those not familiar, he’s talking about his website, or App, which is an online community, bringing together a whole host of people from investing newbies to experts, to discuss and share ideas for investment and speculation in the highly volatile, junior sector of the stock market.

For those interested in attending a conference in person, check out the FREE Subscriber Investment Summit (SIS) in Toronto on March 4th.  The SIS is hosted by Humphreys, Eric Coffin (Hard Rock Analyst) and Keith Schaefer (Oil and Gas Investment Bulletin). I attended this conference last year and it’s time well spent.

 

Conferences are a great way to expand your knowledge of the sector and to speak to the people who are running the companies in which you’re speculating. Learn who these people are – you’re trusting them with your money. Turn your BS detector on and expand your due diligence process!

 

I look forward to seeing you at the SIS and PDAC conferences in March!

 

Until next time,

 

Brian

 

Posted on

A Conversation with Jayant Bhandari – Commentary on India’s Currency Ban

Jayant Bhandari

Today, in 2017, we live in a world of constant flux. The greater recession that began in 2008 continues to plague the world economy, forcing governments to participate in unprecedented ‘Quantitative Easing (QE)’ to stabilize their economies and weaken their currencies. The stability bought with QE has come at an enormous price, as the amount of debt accumulated to keep markets from imploding is reaching crazy levels. The debt overhang will have to be dealt with at some point, and when it does, the government could seek out your savings to pay for it.

Some wise words from one of the world’s most successful International Men and speculators, Doug Casey:

“The day is coming when your local government may stop seeing you as a milk cow and start seeing you as a beef cow, and you want to have options before that day.”

In James Rickards’ new book, The Road to Ruin, Rickards refers to a freezing of the world’s financial system to quell the contagion of a future financial crisis. Sounds crazy? Well, it isn’t. Ask residents and bank account holders in Cyprus circa 2012. Their bank deposits became the cash used to bail-out their “too big to fail” banks. Bank accounts were frozen and 10% removed as a levy or ‘bail-in’ tax to the Cypriot banks, which were severely affected by the struggles of the Greek economy, the downgrading of Cypriot bond credit rating, and finally, exposure to an over-leveraged housing sector.

 

Modi’s War on Cash

In November of last year, the Indian government took a major step towards invoking more control over its people, with the removal of the 500 and 1000 rupee bank notes. To gain a better perspective on the situation in India, I corresponded with Mr. Jayant Bhandari, who knows firsthand the affects of this devastating move by the government.

For those unfamiliar with Bhandari, he has worked for U.S. Global Investors, Casey Research, and published his writing on a number of different platforms. Bhandari is very well respected in the resource sector community, and not only provides sound advice from an investment stand point, but also has a solid grasp of politics, the economy, and culture.

Bhandari now works independently and is continuously travelling the world looking for investment opportunities, primarily in the resource sector. Also, he runs a yearly seminar in Vancouver, entitled Capitalism and Morality, which is attended by resource sector heavy weights, Doug Casey and Rick Rule.

 

The Interview:

Brian: Mr. Bhandari, could you please give readers who are unfamiliar with India’s currency ban a few points on what has happened over the last 2 months since the ban of 500 and 1000 Rupee bank notes?

Jayant: On the night of 8th November 2016, Indian Prime Minister came on the TV to declare that these two highest denomination bank notes, equivalent to US$7.50 and US$15 respectively would no longer be legal tender. Their banning meant that 86% of the monetary value of all currency in circulation disappeared overnight. This created a major crisis in the country—people suddenly had no money. India is mostly a cash based economy. Without cash it was no longer possible for people transact. Money died that night.

When the banks opened, there were long lineups everywhere in the country. People were trying to convert their banned notes into smaller denomination notes, which were still legal tender. But banks did not have those. People wasted a huge amount of time lining up at banks. And then went home empty handed. Even if you could get hold of cash, the maximum allowed was Rs 4,000 (about US$60).

If businesses could not pay, they had to lay off people. If people could not buy, businesses suffered. India is an extremely poor country. A vast majority lives on daily earnings. They had no option but to start going hungry. Anything between 20% and 80% of the economic activity as a result might have come to a halt. Tens of millions of people were laid off.

Now, 50% of Indians have no bank account. So these people did not even have the option to deposit their cash. At least 150 people died in lineups. And then you can imagine how many died unheard and how many tens of millions suffered silently. The situation hasn’t really changed much even after these two months. The problem is that once you destroy the economy it is extremely difficult—almost impossible—to revive it.

 

Brian: The New York Times reports, “The ban is intended both to curb the flow of counterfeit money and to take aim at terrorist organizations that rely on unaccounted-for cash. It is also expected to help the government clean up a system that has relied on cash to pay bribes and avoid taxes.” ~ New York Times

Has the Indian government succeeded in their attempt to curb the flow of counterfeit money and reduce cash that is available to terrorists and bribing?

Jayant: India is an extra-ordinarily corrupt country. As a result of the ban, the tax authorities suddenly got a lot of new power. They increased their raids on people’s homes to look for unaccounted money. They started asking for higher bribes. They got paid what they asked for. I am told that the general level of bribes have gone up 100%.

Now, corruption exists because there are too many complex regulations. Instead of reducing these regulations and decentralizing, Modi has increased regulations and centralization of India.

Moreover, Modi has protected bureaucracy from legal actions. This is truly Orwellian, for the real corrupt people have been sheltered, while small businesses, which have no choice but to pay bribes, were troubled.

Hundreds of millions of Indians desperately poor, who earn a dollar or two a day, had neither unaccounted money nor the capability to collect bribes. These people suffered and went to bed hungry for no reason.

In other words, corruption has gone up, not down.

The new notes are much more prone to be counterfeited. The paper is of bad quality and the ink tends to smear. There have been many reports of bad printing. These bills are certainly of worse quality than those banned.

Terrorism… Someone truly naive might think that troubles in Kashmir can be ended by banning cash. The troubles have continued relentlessly. In fact, under Modi troubles at the border with Pakistan have significantly increased. Modi has massively increased India’s military budget. This combined with increased nationalism and Hindu fanaticism, in which Modi has a huge hand, has brought India very close to a war with Pakistan.

Ironically, Indian army has killed many multiples of its own people than it has of aliens. Indian armed forces operate with impunity in Kashmir, in the north eastern parts, and in tribal areas. They run a regime of terror in these areas. Across the country, fake encounter killings are the norm. Any alleged criminal should expect to be beaten up by the police, the reason no sane person—even if he is raped or assaulted—calls the police. I do make reports once in a while and end up police station just to make sure I keep myself updated.  

 

Brian: It is ironic that governments feel they need to intervene on corruption, when in my mind, at least, politicized economies are what fuel corruption. Ergo, further government regulation, such as a currency ban, only leads to further and more pronounced corruption and greater instability.

In your 8 part series on India’s currency ban (thus far), you have spoken about Prime Minister Narenda Modi’s popularity and his almost cult like following. How has Modi influenced the public?

 Jayant: Modi is a bully. He has been behind encouraging fanaticism among Hindus for the last two decades or more. Indians crave for a strong leader—this helps people transfer responsibilities of their lives to someone else. In short, all you need is demagoguery and sociopathy to rule Indians.

 

Brian: In James Rickards’ book, The Road to Ruin, he discusses shock doctrine and how fear is used to advance new policies that are used to quell fears but, typically, come at the cost of everyone’s liberty.

In your opinion, what do you think Modi’s next moves will be during this time of turmoil and fear?

Jayant: : I completely agree with what Rickards says. Modi did want to generate fear in the society and he has archived that. Indians never had much liberty, but now their situation is worse and getting worse by the day. In my view, India is rapidly on the path to becoming a police state.

Modi has destroyed India’s economy. He will now have to keep plugging holes. You simply cannot undertake a massive social engineering project of this kind and not have to keep doing patch up jobs.

He will likely impose capital controls to stop people from moving their wealth abroad. Modi has also been generating fear among gold owners. He will very likely restrict how much gold people can own.

Apart from having to keep doing patch up jobs, Modi will also have to keep people thinking that he is doing something. He has recently offered a slew of free stuff to the poorest people and to the Middle Class. Of course this means that more money will be stolen from these people. Unlike what happens in the West, not even a part is returned back in India. Indian politicians and bureaucrats keep all of it for themselves. India pays for schools, roads and bridges that merely exist on paper, with nothing on the ground. They don’t like to steal 5% or 10%. They like to steal all.

I have seen fragile old people sitting outside banks and begging to collect a few dollars of pension they should get. But somehow—even in this electronic age—it does not come to their accounts. They end up going door to door, humiliating and demeaning themselves. These are heart-wrenching sights. But a demagogue likes a humiliated, self-respect lacking society.

Whatever Modi does going forward, it will be for the sole aim of making India a police state and to increase his grip on the society.

 

Brian: From your series of articles, it’s clear that you think the outlook for India’s future is dismal. What would have to change in order for you to see it differently?

Jayant: India is an unnatural country. It was created by the British. There are 1.34 billion people with all kinds of ethnic, religious, regional, lingual etc. differences. All these matter, for India is a tribal society. They don’t necessarily like each other. When India became independent, it would have been much better if they had carved out 30-50 countries or many more. If I had control, I would institute constitutional provisions for regions to secede. And I would undertake rapid decentralization of India.

 

Brian: I don’t think it’s a stretch to believe that other governments from around the world are watching India’s currency ban with a keen eye. With most countries operating at a deficit each year, I am sure that demonetization is an option they would like to pursue.

For readers from the western world, it may seem far-fetched to think that it could happen to them. Can you see other countries following India’s example and pushing towards a cashless society? And, if so, why?

Jayant: In my view the situation with countries in South Asia, the Middle East, Africa and most of South America is dismal. These are tribal people. They will have horrendous social and political problems. Most of what I said so far applies to all these countries. They will all disintegrate within my lifetime, to tribal structures.

 

Brian: Once entrenched, political trends like the war on cash are extremely hard to break. I believe it’s more intelligent to use the knowledge of impending political policy for profit, better known as speculation, or at the very least, take the necessary precautions to protect yourself.

In Part 2 of your series on the India Currency Ban, you state,

“As Indian, be a speculator – even if the government does not like it and will blame you for all ills. Try to keep as much of your money in cash, in Rs 100 notes. Rs 2,000 notes have no value when you go shopping for groceries. Keep a supply of water and dried food sufficient for a few months’ needs.”

What advice would you give to people in other countries, where demonetization or a freezing of the financial system is a possibility?

Jayant: In the last 200 years of modern government, people have become very mobile and economies have become extremely complex. At the same time governments have become less competent, for everyone now has a right to vote and those who man the governments are less competent than they were earlier. All these governments are very brittle, much more outside the West than inside it.

While the state is increasingly an unnatural entity, populace are increasingly nationalistic and dependent on their governments. I am not sure how this will play, except that many countries will disintegrate. What I am sure is that there is a lot of pain ahead.

Savers and their wealth will be at huge risks. They will be made scapegoats. They should diversify internationally. And the time to take action is yesterday, particularly for people outside the West.

 

Brian: While Quantitative Easing or money printing by most of the world’s economies has propped up the financial system, thus far, things still appear to be rocky.

Though none of us have crystal balls, if you were to make your best educated guess, is the world’s financial calamity over or are we headed toward further crisis?

 Jayant: What we call money these days is fiat currency. It has no inherent value. Over the last 200 years or more the world has gone through exceptional economic growth. Governments and their printing presses have grown accustomed to continual printing of more and more fiat currency. But now, economies of the West are stagnating. And economies of most emerging markets are in negative-yielding mode, where they have mostly been except for the interlude of the last three decades. Everywhere—expect with some hope from Trump Presidency—the world is doing more of what created the original problems.

 

Brian: I tend to agree with the late Richard Russell, as he said before passing, “in the future to come, it isn’t who makes the most, but loses the least.”

 

Mr. Bhandari, thank you very much for answering my questions.

 

Catch Mr. Bhandari’s Musings on Investing on his website, or you can follow him through social media on his Facebook page or on Twitter, @JayantBhandari5

 

Until next time,

 

Brian

Posted on

The Road To Ruin

Rickards’ Latest Book Predicts Financial Lockdown for Looming Crisis

In my opinion, The Road to Ruin is a book that everyone should read, no matter their interests.  James Rickards is at his best as he foretells how the world’s elites will deal with the impending financial crisis, which he believes will hit us by 2018.

 

ICE NINE

The premise of Road to Ruin is to reveal a plan set out by the world’s elites to freeze the financial system in the face of crisis. No longer will the governments of the world turn to quantitative easing (QE), but will “ICE NINE,” as Rickards puts it, everyone’s financial assets, essentially locking down the world’s financial system. This will mean shutting down the stock exchanges, freezing bank accounts and controlling anything and everything financial in people’s lives.

The effects of QE weren’t  felt by the average Joe, because most of the QE was filtered into America’s too big to fail companies, and mainly banks. A financial system lock down, however, will, without a doubt, be felt by everyone. Fortunes will be frozen in their trading accounts, unable to buy or sell. Bank accounts will be frozen, leaving us with a bare minimum in the way of available cash to buy food, if we are willing to line up and wait our turn at the ATM.

You may be thinking it will never happen, but unfortunately, as Rickards points out, this plan has already been executed, albeit on a smaller scale, in Cyprus in 2012.

Cyprus is the best example of this new way of dealing with a financial crisis, as the European Union was concerned about the contagion of the Cypriot crisis and, therefore, shut down their financial system. The residents of Cyprus had their bank accounts frozen, left to rely on a daily stipend that was plagued by massive lineups. Basically, most had to get by with whatever cash or tradable items they had in their possession.

Those with over $100,000 Euros on deposit with Laiki Bank and Bank of Cyprus were given a haircut of 10% on their deposits . This haircut is referred to as a ‘bail-in,’ and it was used to help re-capitalize the failed banks, reducing the cost to the rest of the European Union.

 

Economic Theory

Rickards’ points out, on numerous occasions, that the Federal Reserve and other central banks around the world are using wrong and outdated models to forecast the future of the world’s economy. Rickards states,

“General equilibrium models also suffer from fallacy of composition. Elites assume local equilibria can be aggregated into a larger equilibrium called the economy. This is like inferring the totality of human nature from a strand of DNA without ever meeting a human.” ~The Road to Ruin pg.210

Equilibrium systems do not have memory, and as Rickards points out, this is a major sticking point when using it for financial market modelling. To further explain his position, he uses a comparison of an economist using equilibrium theory and Ricardian principles (referring to David Ricardo’s, The Principles of Political Economy and Taxation) to examine markets, and the physicists of today using Newton’s theories to explain the universe when Einstein’s Theory of Relativity would do a much better job.

Interestingly, physics is a fantastic way to examine how complex subjects are examined. Newton’s theories came first and work well for the world that we live in, day to day, while Einstein’s Relativity works best on a grand scale, mainly space. Finally, Quantum Mechanics is best used to explain the quantum world, which wasn’t even considered during Newton’s days.

Parlaying this analogy to economics, I much prefer Rickards’ breakdown of financial tools, Complexity Theory, Behavioural Psychology, and Bayesian Statistics, as he uses a different method to look at each aspect of the financial markets, just as physicists do with their theories of nature.

 

The Cycles of Life and Financial Markets

Whether it is Kondratieff wave theory or William Strauss and Neil Howe’s (authors of The Fourth Turning) analysis of the cycles of generations, we are in a crisis period of world history, or ‘winter,’ so to speak. Winter periods are characteristic with major historical turning points; decisions made by the people in crisis will dictate how the next major generational cycle will take form. Fear will either drive us to a prosperous spring or lead us down a very dark path.

Rickards adds to this sentiment and points out,

“They wait for an exogenous shock, a natural disaster or financial crisis, then use fear created by shock to advance their vision. New policy is presented to mitigate the fear.” ~The Road to Ruin – pg.89

“Fear is contagious, like a virus” ~The Road to Ruin pg 295

In my mind, it’s clear that both the Canadian and American voting public have been affected by the turmoil of the last 8 years. As leaders, both Justin Trudeau and Donald Trump are better known for everything but a political background, which certainly speaks to the public’s desire for something ‘different’ in a political leader. The question that remains to be answered is whether the public have chosen wisely or emotion has once again skewed judgement.

 

Fascism

The Road to Ruin goes much further than I thought it would into the realm of government control over markets and people’s everyday lives. While most believe what we see today to be a further  push toward socialism, Rickards states,

“Facism is not in our future, it is here now.” ~The Road to Ruin pg.256

Those who follow the ‘alternative media’ have been exposed to this line of thinking for more than a decade, with 9/11 truly being one of the most polarizing events this world has ever seen, on a number of levels.

What is fascism? Rickards summarizes Jonah Goldberg’s 2008 book, Liberal Fascism, when he says,

“fascist regimes may be quite unalike. Some are murderous such as those of Hitler and Stalin. Some are doctorial such as those of Mussolini and Franco. Some operate within democratic frameworks such as those of Wilson and FDR. What unites them is a shared view that the state is the exclusive mediator of human activity…action through state power” ~ The Road to Ruin pg.257

Over the last decade, whistle blowing on the activities of governments and elites has hit the mainstream, with Julian Assange and Edward Snowden becoming household names.  My question is whether the claims by these people were really heard. With the picture that Rickards paints, I would tend to say that they have not been, or rather, the claims were heard but not fully understood.

 

Special Drawing Rights

How will the elites resolve the financial crisis once they freeze the system? Well, Rickards believes that they will institute more fiat currency, Special Drawing Rights (SDR). SDRs are controlled by the world’s central bank, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and are backed by the world’s largest currencies; the American dollar, the Euro, the Japanese Yen, the British Sterling, and finally, its most recent member, the Chinese Yuang.

The Chinese have gained access to this privileged currency group with their massive accumulation of gold, over the last decade. China is the number 1 producer of gold in the world and the number one consumer, engulfing each ounce that it produces within its borders.

Rickards pointedly states:

“The elite agenda is to hoard gold and substitute special drawing rights as the currency of world trade and finance” ~The Road to Ruin – pg.59

If you want to know more about SDRs, I highly suggest reading Rickards’ previous books, Currency Wars and The Death of Money. These books take a much more in-depth look at the subject and are good reads.

 

Rickards’ Financial Toolkit

Rickards is one of the most trusted financial minds in the world and his rolodex is proof of how far his reach really is.  The Road to Ruin is laced with commentary from the conversations he has had with some of the heaviest hitters in the American Financial world. Along with this commentary, Rickards reveals the financial toolkit that he uses to examine the state of the world’s financial system, which includes:

  • Behaviour Psychology – The key to understanding behaviour psychology, according to Rickards, is to realize that human behaviour in financial markets is irrational and inefficient. For those interested in the topic of the irrational behaviour of humans, check out Dan Ariely’s Predictably Irrational; it’s a great read and a little scary if you apply what he says to your own life!
  • Complexity Theory – Rickards explains Complexity theory using 4 main attributes: diversity, connectedness, interaction and adaption. A system which has these attributes is complex and, therefore, is much harder to predict or forecast than the equilibrium systems that most economists of today use to model capital markets.
  • Casual Inference or Bayesian Statistics – Bayesian probability says that certain events are path dependent, or simply, they have memory. In a random process such as the tossing of a coin, the preceding coin toss does not affect what is going to happen with the next coin toss. In a complex system, such as the stock market, events occurring over the course of time have an effect on the buying and selling that occurs, making the possible outcome more or less likely.

 

In closing, The Road to Ruin covers a lot of important information that people need to be either reminded of or alerted to. The bottom line is that we live in a world in transition, where crisis and turmoil is more common than stability. I believe Rickards’ message is to be cognizant of the outcomes of a flawed financial system, the motivations behind the elites who control the governing bodies of the world, and finally, to prepare yourself and your family for the freezing of your financial assets.

“Society does not get endlessly richer and more sophisticated. Periodically things collapse. It is not the end of the world. It is the end of an age.” ~The Road to Ruin pg.297

Check out James Rickards’ new book, The Road to Ruin. You won’t be disappointed!

 

In Rickards’ conclusion to the book, he gives the reader a portfolio for weathering the impending storm. Now, I think it only fair to Rickards that you purchase the book to find out what’s in that portfolio. I will, however, review a few financial products that I believe will help those who want to prepare for the financial future that Rickards is predicting, over the course of the next month or so. Stay tuned!

 

If you enjoyed this article and don’t want to miss another financial product review or investment idea, become a Junior Stock Review VIP now, for FREE!

 

Until next time,

 

Brian Leni  P.Eng

Founder – Junior Stock Review

 

 

Posted on

A Look at NexGen, with Commentary from Peter Epstein

NexGen Energy Ltd.

I’ve broken Part 4 of my series on uranium down into segments, as I review the companies I believe have the best chance for success in the upcoming uranium bull market. The companies covered thus far include Cameco, Energy Fuels, GoviEX, and today, NexGen Energy Limited.

For this report on NexGen, I had the opportunity to exchange emails with a fellow resource market researcher and publisher, Peter Epstein of Epstein Research. Epstein is a Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) and possesses an MBA from NYU’s Stern School of Business. Epstein is well versed in the analysis of junior resource companies, and in particular, NexGen.

Enjoy the interview!

 

Interview:

Brian: 2016 has marked 12 year lows for the uranium spot price, hitting $17.75 USD / lbs  just a few weeks ago. While the uranium price action has been devastating to most of the companies in the sector, the market has responded to stories like NexGen’s.

NexGen’s maiden resource estimate was strong enough to propel its share price from the 60 cent CAD range all the way to a high of $2.86 CAD in the months after. NexGen is receiving recognition in a down market; it’s speculation, but one can imagine the valuation in a uranium bull market.

None of us have a crystal ball and can tell the future, but what do you see happening in the future for uranium?

Peter: Yes, crystal balls around the world have failed miserably to predict the uranium price for 3-4 years running.  Sell-side research firms have fared no better.  I really do believe that $17.75/lb. is a low in the cycle, but I’m not sure how far or how fast the spot price might rebound.  I mean, adjusted for inflation, $17.75/lb.  in 2004 dollars is equal to ~$14/lb.  Longer-term, I’m comfortable with contract prices in the $60-$70/lb. range, with periods above and below that level.

Headwinds are centered on supply and shadow inventory (lbs. that might come to market if prices rise).  But, offsetting that, from say 2020 on, is the serious risk of security of supply.  In 2015, a combined 47% came from top producing country Kazakhstan, along with Russia & Ukraine.  By contrast, 34% came from Canada, Australia & the U.S.  Further, with depressed prices, a lot of projects have been delayed, cancelled/abandoned.  Some large projects require prices of $70-$85/lb. to be viable (while maintaining a reasonable margin for error).

Regarding demand, despite euphoria over China, it’s hard to move the global demand needle. Still, 3% growth year after year for 20-30 years could be all it takes to spark a sellers’ market, that’s not near-term, but certainly a decent possibility by the early 2020’s.

 

Brian: As I’m sure you will agree, investing your money with the junior resource sector’s best people is the most tried and trusted method for success in an unforgiving junior market. Let us take a look at the key members of NexGen’s team.

NexGen is led by Mr. Leigh R. Curyer, who has over 20 years experience in the uranium sector. Curyer’s formal education is in accounting and finance from the University of South Australia. As Head of Corporate Development with Accord Nuclear Resource Management and CFO of Southern Cross Resources (now Uranium One), Curyer has gained significant experience in evaluating prospective uranium projects around the world. Also, before being appointed to CEO of NexGen in 2012, Curyer spent just over 5 years running his own consulting business, offering services to resource sector companies that included incorporating, corporate development, international financing and directorship services. Finally, Curyer has raised over $500 million in equity over the course of his career in North America, Europe and Australia, which is a KEY skill to have in the junior resource sector.

Next on Curyer’s team is VP of Exploration and Development, Garrett Ainsworth. Ainsworth is a Professional Geologist, receiving his degree from the University of London. Before joining the NexGen team, Ainsworth was a project manager with Alpha Minerals Inc. and Fission Uranium Corporation. Ainsworth is credited with being instrumental in the success of the Patterson Lake South project, where he oversaw the staking of new claims, the discovery of the boulder field and a number of high-grade uranium drill hole discoveries.

On November 9, 2016 NexGen announced the appointment of Dr. Mark O’Dea to its Board of Directors. O’Dea is a powerhouse in the resource sector; his company, Oxygen Capital Corporation, has helped grow a host of successful junior resource companies, such as True Gold, Pilot Gold and Fronteer Gold. Personally, I have made a lot of money speculating in companies that O’Dea was involved in.  My most recent O’Dea winner was True Gold, which sold their Burkina Faso property to Endeavour Mining this past spring.

In my mind, O’Dea is game changer, and his interest and involvement in NexGen Energy speaks to the quality of NexGen’s Arrow project and other future prospects.

Curyer’s management team is rounded out by Travis McPherson, Corporate Development Manager, and Grace Marosits, CFO. To me, it’s clear that NexGen has a great management team and a board of directors to steer the company towards success in the coming uranium bull market.

 

Uranium Abundance in ppm
Source: World Nuclear Association

 

Brian: NexGen’s property is set in a premier jurisdiction, the Athabasca Basin in northern Saskatchewan, Canada, which is home to the highest-grade uranium deposits in the world.  For those unfamiliar with the NexGen story, its Rook 1 Project (Arrow, Bow and Harpoon Discoveries) is located in the Basin’s Southwest corner.

Unlike Cameco’s Cigar Lake and others in the Basin, which are sandstone-hosted (egress type) deposits, NexGen’s Arrow discovery is basement-hosted (ingress type).

Why is this an advantage for NexGen?

Peter: That’s a great question. This distinction is what makes the Arrow discovery the single best un-developed project on the planet.  You correctly mentioned Athabasca grades being ~100x greater than the global average; that begs the question – why doesn’t Cameco have ridiculous, insane margins?  Because its two giant mines, McArthur/Key Lake & Cigar Lake are subject to substantial, ongoing technical risks and commensurate elevated capital and operating costs, mostly due to the challenge of keeping water out.  McArthur & Cigar are aptly named, they are both underneath bodies of water!

So, the crucial advantages NexGen’s Arrow project has are 1) it’s basement hosted and 2) it’s not under a lake.  This should enable the Company to incur less capital & operating costs, and fewer and less costly technical challenges, while benefiting greatly from the monster uranium grades in the basin.

As one major NexGen shareholder explained, “The sandstone is water-charged and has a toothpaste-like consistency.  It is unstable for mining and requires complex freezing techniques.  Basement hosted deposits can be mined with conventional techniques.

 

Brian: NexGen’s maiden resource estimate, which was announced this past March, is an Inferred 201.9 million pounds @ 2.63% U3O8, making it the largest undeveloped uranium deposit in the Basin. The deposit is large and it appears that the NexGen management is focused on making it bigger, with some terrific drill results released on December 20th.

While the best people and great properties in good jurisdictions top most people’s lists of considerations when speculating in a junior resource company, the next is often whether or not the company has the cash to execute its plan.

Does NexGen have the cash needed to execute their drilling plans for 2017, and to complete a Pre-Feasibility Study (“PFS”)?

Peter: NexGen’s balance sheet is an underappreciated factor in assessing the Company.  They are funded for the next 2 years.  That’s expected to cover funding for aggressive drill campaigns, a few updated mineral resource estimates and delivery of a PFS.  Perhaps more important, in my opinion, management has access to additional funds from the market, if needed.  To be clear, I don’t think the Company will need much if any equity capital in 2017.  But even if they did, it would very likely be an issuance of less than an additional 5% of outstanding shares.

Most pre-production juniors are under a tremendous amount of pressure to keep the coffers full, which is a material drain on management resources.  NexGen has moved beyond that difficult phase and can concentrate fully on advancing its projects.  I like to say that NexGen is fully funded through takeout.

 

Brian: I attended the Subscribers Investment Summit in Toronto this past March, and caught Tommy Humphreys’ (of CEO.ca) interview with Warren Irwin of Rousseau Asset Management. They primarily discussed NexGen and the merits of its world-class discovery.

At the time, Irwin’s outlook was that this discovery could get much bigger, making it a strategic asset for takeover by any of the major uranium producers in the world.

In your opinion, what’s the end game for a deposit like this?

Peter: Look, the end game is clear, my crystal ball says that NexGen will get acquired in 2018 or 2019.  By then, the uranium price will likely have improved and demand for secure supply will be higher as a muted supply response shines a light on how tight the market might get from 2020 on.  What really strikes me though is the sheer number of global natural resource companies with the financial wherewithal to take NexGen out.

Dozens could make that move, and not just uranium companies.  I often say that Teck Resources is an ideal suitor.  It has invested billions into an Oil Sands venture that can’t be looking that exciting at current oil prices.  Due to a global march towards zero % interest rates, Teck can borrow low-interest capital to fund acquisitions.  And, it’s share price was up something like 800% in 2016!  That’s a powerful currency to deploy for M&A.

Any global natural resource player like a BHP, Rio or Vale should care, but why not E&P companies?  Why not precious metal Majors?  Why not coal & iron ore companies?  NexGen offers compelling geographic, geopolitical and commodity diversification.  I mean, a company prudent enough to make a move into uranium near the low of the cycle would presumably be smart enough to shoot for the very best, that leaves NexGen as the prime target.

 

Brian: Thank you very much, Peter, for answering my questions on NexGen Energy.

Where should readers go to learn more about yourself and Epstein Research?

Peter: Readers should, dare I say must, go directly to Epstein Research and enter an email for FREE, instant delivery of my work.  It takes 12.5 seconds.  Fear not, one will not be inundated, I post only 2-3 times a week.

In addition, I post my articles and written interviews on up to 15 unaffiliated websites including, equities.com, StockHouse, SeekingAlpha, TalkMarkets, MiningFeeds, MetalsNews, EquityGuru.  I’m very well versed, but not an expert like Donald Trump, in uranium, gold, silver, copper, lithium and coal.

 

 

NexGen’s story is compelling and has the ability to improve with further drilling and a PFS to be completed over the next couple of years. I completely agree with Peter; NexGen will most likely be acquired in the future, giving the purchasing company, arguably, the uranium sector’s most influential mine site, as its size and production costs should be amongst the top in the world.

Putting it all together, you get a great management team, a tier 1 property, and the cash needed to execute further drilling and a PFS. NexGen presents a great value proposition in a depressed uranium market.

 

 

Until next time,

 

Brian

 

 

 

 

Disclaimer: Junior Stock Review – The following is not an investment recommendation, it is an investment idea. I am not a certified investment professional, nor do I know you and your individual investment needs. Please perform your own due diligence. I have not been compensated to write this article. However, I do own shares in NexGen Energy Ltd.

 

Disclaimer: Epstein Research – Please note the following. Mr. Epstein had no prior or existing relationship with NexGen Energy until [1/15/16]. As of that date, NexGen Energy became a paid Sponsor of Epstein Research. At that time, Mr. Epstein owned shares in NexGen Energy Ltd. He is not a registered or licensed financial advisor. His article(s) on NexGen Energy and others must be considered carefully in this context. The content contained in articles and written interviews on NexGen Energy is for informational and/or illustrative purposes only. Readers are strongly advised to consult with their own licensed or registered financial advisors before making investment decisions. This company is highly speculative, and therefore not suitable for all investors.

 

 

Posted on

Looking Back at 2016 with Brian Leni, the Junior Stock Review

Junior Stock Review Logo

By Peter @Newton Bell, 29 December 2016

Following on our discussion of the Proust Questionnaire, Brian Leni and I turned our attention to the markets.  We talked about Brian’s series of articles on the uranium and lithium markets, and I learned that production from brines can vary greatly depending on weather. I put some questions to Brian about the implications of the cost declines of solar and we even talked briefly about the potential of thorium reactors! Find all that and more below.

>>

P: It’s the end of the year here – 2016 – and it’s been a wild year for our segment of the markets. We just had another rate hike here recently from the Federal Reserve, so I wonder if January 2017 will resemble the one just past.

B: Tough to say. Personally, I don’t know what to think.

P: I remember sitting there in January, watching things happening and being scared out of my wits!

B: I try not to focus on the short-term, but I think some things still make a lot of sense.  For example, the gold thesis has never been better. It’s still “not if, but when.” The short-term fluctuations are probably going to prove to be good buying opportunities as people realize you can’t just keep going into debt to solve our problems.

P: Developments around the world continue to be staggering. Whether its India overnight changes to what counts as legal tender, or all the stuff happening in the Middle East. There was some nasty news recently about Israel, an outcome that they didn’t want at the UN regarding Jerusalem.  Tensions in the Far East, too. And the USA approved a $600+ billion dollar military spending package a couple of days before Christmas. Same as it ever was, I guess.

P: You had a big piece out about lithium there, about the supply and demand fundamentals. Any comment on what it was like to do all that research there? (Lithium)

B: The lithium market is very interesting. For a metal that, I believe, is going to be in high demand over the next couple of years, it’s hard to find and put together the information for supply and demand dynamics.  The market is still very small. There are four main players. You’re talking about concentrations of production coming predominantly out of the lithium triangle in South America – that’s Chile, Argentina and Bolivia, and the main hard rock source from Australia. The rest of the world is in a race to catch up.

B: When the gigga-factory and the electrical car movement really starts to hit its stride, it will be a scramble to meet that demand. It’ll be interesting to see how this plays out.

P: It’s tough because I’ve heard Rick Rule say there are enough known reserves to satisfy demand for a long time.

B: Chris Martenson, of PeakProsperity.com, has some relevant theories that can be applied to that.  He has a line of analysis where he explains the concept of peak oil. Most people think of peak oil as “we’re going to run out of oil,” but he points out that it’s not necessarily the case.  There are massive oil reserves and even more that we have yet to find. What may end up being more important is the rate at which you can extract the oil versus the rate it’s consumed; inflow versus outflow.

B: A similar argument could be made for lithium. While there are significant lithium reserves in the world, the rate at which they can be harvested is going to be, in my mind, the sticking point.  Simply put, there are typically technical issues with bringing these deposits to production, and especially with brines. The brine settling ponds are impacted by the weather, with evaporation being a key aspect of the refinement process. Therefore, any changes in weather patterns in the world could wreak havoc on this process, hurting production figures.

B: I don’t disagree with Rick.  There are a lot of known deposits of lithium out there, but I think it’s more complicated than just referring to the number of reserves that exist in the world.

P: Well, that’s something I haven’t heard before — the variability in the production from the brines. If we’re talking about a market with a few large sources of supply and these sources have great potential variability caused by weather, then that is a very interesting set up for tightness in the market.

B: Definitely.  The lithium triangle in South America is the premier source of cheap lithium. Politically, Argentina has changed dramatically with their new president, and South America as a whole is looking pretty good from a political risk perspective, but who knows how the Trump effect could reverberate down there.  If he decides he wants to add tariffs to certain commodities, he could add a source of instability to the lithium market.

B: Suppose something did happen to brine production in the lithium triangle. You could, conceivably, see half of the global production of lithium come offline.  That would be a serious development that could have major impacts under the current demand profile, let alone in a growth scenario.  I don’t know what is going to happen, but it is very interesting to see how all these different things could significantly affect this relatively small market.

P: Right.  The growing demand profile for lithium always seems to be the thing that gets people excited.

B: Yes. The Paris accord was passed last year — lots of press around that. And the International Energy Agency has something called the 450 Scenario, which calls for reductions of carbon emissions to achieve global concentrations of greenhouse gasses of 450 parts per million. They plan to do that in segments – by 2040.  For example, if the United States is to comply with the reduction of carbon emissions related to vehicles, they will have to reduce their emissions by 3%.

B: Deutsche Bank came out with their forecast for lithium demand, which I cited in my report.  It was a linear distribution going out to 2025. From my experience, not much in real life follows a linear path, it is typical exponential growth that dictates most behaviour. If demand increases faster than expected, it becomes about how fast you can get the lithium out of the ground to meet demand. It might not be a long-term demand squeeze, but the setup is there for at least a year of huge volatility.  The markets may be able to get it under control by bringing on other sources of supply, in line with what Rick has said, but you could have short-term fluctuations with major price swings, in my opinion.

P: Well, I am curious to learn more about the potential for declines in lithium brine production caused by weather. The bits and pieces that I’ve heard about the engineering aspects of brine production are very interesting. Any other commodities that you’d like to discuss here?

B: Despite my interest in lithium, I tend to concentrate on things that are out of favour. For the last two and a half months, I’ve written a four-part series on uranium and why I think the future is bright (Uranium Scenarios – Part 3B of 4). The more people who doubt it, the more I like it. I think it was Marin Katusa who came out a couple of weeks ago and called a bottom in uranium prices.  Time will tell if he’s right, but it is better to be early than late for this one, I think!

P: Any comments on solar and wind, broadly, as competitors for nuclear energy?

B: Yes.  I see a couple of things to discuss there. Typically, when people are talking about alternative energies like solar and wind, they’re focusing on the environmental impact. If you compare it to nuclear power, neither have any direct carbon emissions.  If you look into the construction and fabrication of solar cells and wind turbines –it all requires mining.

B: Some of the European data I’ve seen suggests that nuclear power actually has a lower carbon footprint than renewables.  You can then look at the physical footprint of the renewables.  The footprint for wind turbines can be quite large and they often take up a lot of farmland. I live in a part of Ontario where there is a lot of controversy over windmills, because people don’t want to live next to them for a number of reasons.

B: And, with solar farms, the efficiencies on the photovoltaic cells are pretty poor right now.  They need to create huge solar farms to produce enough electricity to register on the grid.  In Canada, we live north of the 49th parallel, and the amount of sun is pretty low in comparison to some of the southern States or countries across the equator.  I don’t think solar is the answer for baseload power either, at least in its current technological state.

B: If people can get over the fact that there’s radioactive waste then uranium is the obvious answer.  In the long term, the uranium business will change as the industry is coming up with new types of nuclear reactors.  These new reactors are going to use what we now consider to be nuclear waste; material with well under the 3.5% U235 fissile material that’s commonly used as fuel.

P: I’ve heard troubling comments about the cost declines in solar — negative electricity prices on spot markets during mid-day in some of the deregulated markets, like California and Germany.

B: I don’t know much about that.  In Ontario, at least, there was a feed in tariff programme where the provincial government gave 20-year contracts to power producers, large and small, for fixed prices somewhere between 75c to $1 per kWh.  That is significantly above the peak rate that we pay for electricity in Ontario, which is around 10c. A lot of the market is still subsidized and somebody is paying for it in some shape or form. It would be interesting to see what the actual cost is to produce renewable energy in Ontario, all in.

P: Well, the issue of non-market actors coming in and doing things to help seems to be a big issue throughout history.  Getting in there and distorting the price signals.

B: Absolutely.

P: Commodity markets are prone to exaggeration at the best of times, I think, but add in some government assistance and that can just make things all the more complicated. Distorting the signals is a big deal — seems to me that they can cover up problems in the short term, allow them to persist, and develop into something bigger.

B That seems to be why government intervention generally doesn’t work — you can’t create these imbalances.  An example from the natural world, we tried to fix the problem with the Purple Loosestrife plant in Ontario by bringing in an African beetle to eat it.  Which, on the surface was great; they solved that problem. But, what happens with this new influx of beetles? The solutions can cause more problems and things can get out of hand quickly.  Somethings are meant to die — it’s sad, but it’s part of life. You have to let it happen.

P: And investing around that — I guess that’s why we get painted with the brush of being evil speculators sometimes.

B: That’s right!

P: To change gears a bit, does technological change that figure in prominently to your thinking and investing?  I see it there in the uranium industry, but I suspect that it may be hard to invest in that yet.

B: They’ve got these fast neutron reactors that are being tested in China and in Russia, and there’s also thorium reactors.  Thorium reactors are interesting because thorium is much more abundant in the world and the waste isn’t as much of a concern. It’s something the Chinese are really pursuing, but their dates for these things are far away — maybe 2040 or 2050.

B: My thoughts are that most of this technological change is exponential. You could plot a linear path as much as you like, but when things follow an exponential path, it could be upon us before you know it! As such, I think the next boom in uranium is going to be great and there may be another cycle to be had before we get to the next generation of technologies — I think uranium is one of those things that you take it one cycle at a time. Don’t try to get too ahead of yourself about what might happen in 20 years because so much can change by then.

P: I’ve heard a distinction made about growth markets versus dependency markets, which has been helpful for me.  Coal is, apparently, an example of a dependency market because it is still essential commodity, but there’s not a lot of new coal demand coming on stream and that doesn’t really incentivize exploration. Its not really a sexy business to be in. From that perspective, the rally in coal prices this year will undo itself by bringing forward some of the known production sources — it’s not the start of a long-term bull run in coal driven by new demand sources.  I wonder if uranium is moving in a similar direction.  I recognize there is a lot of new demand coming onIine from nuclear plants around the world, but wonder how technological change may affect that in the future.

P: Anyway, I’ve always enjoyed hearing about the thorium stuff there and always loved to hear how rare earths and thorium are often found together.  I feel like that is really futuristic stuff there — a host of next-generation metals from one source.

B: This is off topic, but some of Nikolas Tesla’s free energy theories are just incredible. Some people say that the stuff he was working on actually exists, but has been supressed because there’s no profit to be made. Who knows, but if you want to talk about revolutionary — free energy could change every aspect of our lives and society. We fight most of our wars about energy, so it’s interesting to think what could happen if energy were free.

P: That’s always been something I’ve liked about the world of junior stocks — you need a bit of optimism and hope that you could change the world for the better. It can be as simple as creating jobs in a place, or as big as new types of nuclear power.  Maybe we’re both new to it, but that ambition always appealed to me.

P: So, can we expect to see you actively writing in 2017?

B: I’m looking forward to publishing some stuff in the next couple of weeks, here. And I’ll be at the Vancouver Resource Conference and PDAC, as well.

P: Well, please post some updates to CEO.CA so we can follow along.  Thanks for the chat, Brian, I look forward to talking again with you.

B: Thanks, Peter.  My pleasure.  All the best for 2017.

Posted on

The Lithium Supply and Demand Story

Lithium Demand Graph

Why lithium? Great question. In my opinion, it’s simultaneously the simplest and most complex metal. Lithium’s ‘simplicity’ comes from the fact that it’s been used in industry for quite some time, and most of the general public know the metal in its battery form. Its complexity relates to the science behind how and why it’s presently used, but more importantly, the role lithium will play in the future.

Lithium isn’t rare, but the lithium market is definitely under developed in comparison to most other industrial commodities, leaving the space to a select few conglomerate giants and a group of junior companies. The fact is, lithium has a ton of applications, from lubricating grease and glass fabrication, to glazes for ceramics, and finally, batteries. In particular, lithium is and will continue to play an increasingly important role in the battery-powered clean air future.

Let’s take a closer look at the lithium narrative…

 

Lithium – Hard-Rock and Brine

Lithium is present in a number of different minerals, but for those who deal with its commercial extraction, there are really only a few that are of interest.

 

Pegmatites

Pegmatites are commonly found throughout the world, but lithium-rich granite pegmatites are much less common, making up less than 1%. Granite pegmatite-ore bodies are the hard-rock source of lithium. The lithium minerals that occur in granite pegmatites are spodumene, apatite, lepidolite, tourmaline and amblygonite.

Spodumene is the most commonly occurring lithium hard-rock mineral, which, once upon a time, made it the number one source of lithium metal in the world. It has since been surpassed by brines, which, for a number of reasons, have become the largest contributor to lithium production.

Pegmatite Hard-Rock Processing

Lithium hard-rock recovery can be broken down into a few key steps: crushing of the ore, concentration by froth floatation, followed by hydrometallurgy and precipitation from an aqueous solution. From here, depending on the application, the producer will typically create either lithium hydroxide or lithium carbonate, which can be sent to factories to be manufactured into its final form.

When evaluating a hard-rock lithium deposit, there are a few key things to look for:

Lithium Grade – Arguably the most important figure in any type of deposit. Typically, the higher the grade of lithium, the more economic the deposit.

By-Products – Not to be confused with ‘harmful’ impurities, by-products can help reduce the cost per ton because they have value. For lithium hard-rock deposits, tantalum, beryllium and caesium are examples of profitable by-products of the refinement process.

Impurity Levels – High concentrations of impurities (non-profitable by-products) can lead to higher refinement costs and could limit their use in end use applications, such as glass and ceramics.

Location – Poor proximity to infrastructure can make a high grade lithium mine a lot less profitable or not even economically feasible.

 

Brines

Lithium brine deposits are accumulations of saline groundwater that are enriched in dissolved lithium. Lithium concentrations are typically measured in parts per million (ppm), milligrams per litre (mg/L) and weight percentage.

Brine is pumped up from the ground and placed into man-made ponds, where the lithium is concentrated via evaporation. Depending on the climate and weather in the region of the brine deposit, lithium concentration can take a few months to a year. Typically, lithium concentrations range between 1 and 2%. Unlike their hard-rock cousins, these concentrations can be sent to processing plants for end use production.

All lithium brine deposits have a few common characteristics (Bradley, Munk, Jochens, Hynek, Labay. USGS – A Preliminary Deposit Model for Lithium Brines, 4).

  • Arid climates
  • Closed basin containing a playa or salar
  • Tectonically driven subsidence
  • Associated igneous or geothermal activity
  • Suitable lithium source-rocks
  • One or more aquifers
  • Sufficient time to concentrate a brine

 

Similarly to the list of common characteristics for brine deposits, there are a few things that are particularly important when evaluating a brine deposit:

Evaporation Rate – evaporation is dependent upon the climate in which the deposit is located. Hours of sunlight, humidity, wind levels and temperature all have an effect on the evaporation rate. A low evaporation rate could make the difference between an economic deposit and an uneconomic one.

Lithium Grade – Arguably the most important figure in any type of deposit. Typically, the higher the grade of lithium, the more economic the deposit.

By-Products – Not to be confused with ‘harmful’ impurities, by-products can help reduce the cost per ton because they have value. For lithium deposits, the primary by-product is potassium.

Location – Poor proximity to infrastructure can make a high grade lithium mine a lot less profitable or not even economically feasible.

Impurity Levels – The magnesium to lithium ratio and the sulphate to lithium ratio are very important figures to look at when examining a brine deposit, because separating these impurities from the lithium is one of the largest expenses in the brine refinement process. For both of these ratios, you’re looking for low figures.

Brines are today’s answer to lithium demand as they are more wide spread, typically larger in resource scale, and generally have lower production costs.  Countries such as Chile, Argentina and China extract the majority of their lithium production from brine deposits.

 

 

The Lithium Supply Story

Lithium Mine Production

Source: United States Geological Survey (USGS)

Lithium reserves exist on 5 continents: North America, South America, Africa, Asia and Australia. As the table shows, however, there are reserves on 5 continents but the concentration is in South America, where there’s approximately 66% of the world’s reserves.

‘The Lithium Triangle’ refers to Chile, Argentina and Bolivia. Beginning with Chile, the number 2 producer of lithium in the world and 1st in reserves, their reserves are held in brine deposits. Its main brine deposit is The Salar de Atacama, which is located in the Antofagasta region. The Salar de Atacama is approximately 3000 square kilometres and has an estimated 6.8 Mt of lithium reserves.

For reference, ‘salar’ means a salt-encrusted depression (as in the nitrate fields in Chile) that may or may not be the basin of an evaporated lake

The other key player in The Lithium Triangle is Argentina, the number 3 producer of lithium in the world and 3rd in reserves. Argentina’s source of lithium, like Chile, is found in brines. Although Bolivia currently makes up the smallest portion of The Lithium Triangle, it’s thought to have the largest undeveloped lithium brine in the world, Salar de Uyuni. USGS Mineral Commodity Summaries estimates that this prized salt flat contains 9 million tonnes of identified lithium resource.

China is the number 4 producer of lithium in the world and 2nd in reserves. China’s lithium deposits are found both in hard-rock and brine sources. Its lithium-rich pegmatite deposits are found in Jiajika, Barkam, Altai, Koktokay and the Nanping district, while its lithium-rich brines, which possess the vast majority of its reserves, are found mainly on the Quighai-Tibet plateau.

Currently, Australia is the number 1 producer of lithium in the world. Australia’s lithium is held in hard-rock deposits, mainly the Greenbushes deposit, which is currently in production. Finally, the Mount Cattlin and Mount Marion projects, which aren’t yet in production, are expected to alleviate some of the supply crunch for world demand in the future.

 

Lithium is primarily sold through private contracts which are controlled by 4 companies:

Lithium Market Share

Source: Sociedad Quimca Y Minera De Chile  – Corporate presentation – Slide 11

 

With only 4 major players in the lithium market, I have put together some quick points on each company to give you an idea of who they are, where they are, and what they do.

 

Sichuan Tianqi Lithium Industries  – Tianqi information taken from their website, unless otherwise cited.

  • Collectively, Chinese lithium producers have a market share of 40% (SQM – slide 11)
  • Traded on the Shenzhen Exchange (SZSE)
  • Based in China and founded in 1995. As stated on their website, “We…are a key enterprise to the Provincial Government’s initiative for the ‘Promotion and Support of Emerging Strategic Industries,’ ”
  • Tianqi offers a diverse product line, with both specialty and industrial application lithium products.

 

Sociedad Quimca Y Minera De Chile (SQM) – All information acquired through corporate presentation

  • Lithium market share of 26%
  • Founded in 1968 to reorganize the Chilean nitrate industry. Over time, converted from a fully Chilean State owned company to a private enterprise by 1988.
  • Ownership Structure: Pampa Group and Kona Group – 32%, Potash Corporation – 32%, Bank of New York (ADRS) – 23%, and Other – 13% .
  • SQM is involved in a number of market segments, such as specialty plant nutrition, iodine, lithium, industrial chemicals, potassium and metals exploration.
  • SQM lithium resources are held in salar brines within the Atacama Salt Desert region of Chile. Joint Venture Project in Argentina planned for production in 2019, with a 50K Mt/year capacity.
  • Traded on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE).

 

Albemarle –  All Albemarle information taken from website and Corporate Investor Presentation (September 13, 2016)

  • 2015 Lithium market share of 20%.
  • Traded on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE).
  • Headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina, United States.
  • Albemarle Paper Manufacturing Company was founded in 1887.
  • Albemarle is involved in a number of market segments, such as refining solutions, lithium and advanced materials, bromine specialties, fine chemistry services, and Chemetall surface treatment.
  • In 2015, Albemarle acquired Rockwood Holdings, parent company for Rockwood Lithium, for USD $6.2 Billion.
  • Albemarle operates the world’s 2nd largest brine project on Salar de Atacama in Chile, with an output of 25 ktpa, and the Silver Peak brine operation in the U.S., with an output of 6 ktpa.
  • Australian Hard-Rock Resources – Greenbushes Mine (through Talison JV) – Albemarle’s share of annual capacity is 30 ktpa.

FMC Corporation  – All FMC information taken from website.

  • Lithium market share 12%.
  • Traded on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE).
  • Established in 1883, FMC roots are in agriculture.
  • Corporate Headquarters in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and Charlotte, North Carolina.
  • FMC is involved in a number of market segments, such as agriculture, health and nutrition and lithium.
  • 79% of FMC’s lithium revenue is derived from the sale of lithium specialty products, such as lithium hydroxide, butyllithium, and high purity metal.

 

Technological Affects on Lithium Supply

A major impact to the lithium supply story could come from a technological breakthrough in the refinement of lithium brines. Current research and development dollars spent by South Korean giant, POSCO, and privately owned, Energi Corporation, are exploring methods of refining lithium brine without the use of evaporation.  The current major cost in the brine refinement process is the removal of impurities such as magnesium, calcium, iron and potassium via evaporation and additives.  If they are successful, it will revolutionize the lithium mining industry, as more deposits will become economical and existing mining operations could change production methods to capitalize on cheaper processing costs. When or if this occurs, is a big question.

That said, the fact that R&D dollars are being spent in lithium refinement is a major plus, in my books. With this much interest, I think you can almost guarantee a strong future for lithium, worldwide.

 

 

Lithium Demand

Currently, lithium’s demand is rooted in the following applications (in no particular order):

Lubricant Grease – An estimated 2.38 billion pound market, in which lithium-based greases make up 75%. Lithium-based greases generally have good stability, high temperature characteristics and water-resistance properties.

Glass – Lithium typically sourced from the mineral spodumene reduces the viscosity and thermal expansion of glass and, therefore, leads to increased melting efficiencies and/or larger effective furnace capacities. The end result is a substantial energy savings for the glass manufacturers.

Ceramics – Lithium is used in the ceramics industry to produce glazes. The glazes improve a ceramic piece’s shock absorption and stain resistance, protecting the piece against damage. Lithium carbonate is typically used for this application.

Health Products – Lithium, in small amounts (around 0.170 mg/L), is prescribed to those with bipolar disorders or individuals with depression who don’t respond to anti-depressants.

Batteries – Batteries are possibly the best known lithium application of all. It’s where the future lays for lithium demand. This will be explained further in the next section.

 

Batteries

Why is lithium used in batteries? Simply, with current technology, lithium provides the best combination of energy density (weight to power ratio) and price.

Batteries have essentially three main components: cathode, anode and electrolyte. When the cathode and anode are connected via a wire, for example, electrons flow from the anode through the wire to the cathode, creating an electrical current.

Currently, there are an estimated 80 different lithium-ion battery chemistries in production, with these varying chemistries all exhibiting different characteristics, such as capacity and voltage. Lithium is typically found in the cathode of the battery, commonly in the form of lithium cobalt oxide, while the electrolyte is commonly in the form of a lithium salt, such as LiPF6, LiBF4 or LiCLO4. The anode material is commonly carbon-based, with graphite being the most popular.

Overall, a lithium ion battery’s output is around 3.6 volts, which is more than twice as much as its alkaline cousin.

 

What does the current lithium demand by application look like?

2015 Lithium Demand by Application

Source: Deutsche Bank Markets Research – Lithium 101 – pg.23

Projected demand for 2025 is much different, not only in overall demand tonnage, but the percentages each application encompasses. The future is expected to be bright for batteries in the non-traditional markets; electric cars, e-bikes, and energy storage.

2025 Lithium Demand by Application

Source: Deutsche Bank Markets Research – Lithium 101 – pg.23

 

Lithium Present and Future Market Demand

Lithium Demand Graph

Source: Deutsche Bank Markets Research – Lithium 101 – pg.23

The interesting thing about this projected demand curve is that it is linear. The reason I think that’s interesting is that most things in life don’t follow a linear path, especially those things that are rapidly changing, such as the lithium market. Now, the opposite could be true, the demand could be flat or declining in the future, but I tend to think that the future for lithium will be exponential.

For those who don’t know what an exponential function looks like, think of a hockey stick turned upwards with the blade in the air. Basically, it looks linear for a while, constant growth, and then boom – to the moon it goes.

Why do I think this? Mainly because of the politicized nature of green energy. Whether it’s the 450 Scenario or some other push to reduce carbon emissions, governments across the world are allocating more and more policy and CASH to the cause. The final inflection point could be massive and it could happen before 2025, in my opinion.

 

Emissions Perspective

The 450 Scenario calls for long-term concentrations of local greenhouse gases to be at 450 ppm CO2 equivalent by 2040. To put that into perspective, we globally emitted 32,381 Mt of CO2 in 2014 (International Energy Agency, 2016 Key World Energy Statistics, 45). Under the 450 Scenario, that number reduces dramatically to 18,777 Mt of CO2.

Using the United States as an example,  Statista states that there were around 260 million registered vehicles in the United States in 2014. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) estimates that U.S. fossil fuel consumption for transportation in 2015 resulted in a combined 1,545 million tonnes of CO2, which is 29% of the total CO2 emissions by the country.

Emissions per vehicle = 1,545,000,000 / 260,000,000 = 6 tonnes/vehicle

Therefore, my estimated carbon emissions per U.S. vehicle is around 6 tonnes per year. If the United States figures to comply with the goals of the 450 Scenario, to drop transportation emissions to 26%, in-line with the rest of the world, they will need a reduction of 3% (29% to 26%) (International Energy Agency, 2016 Key World Energy Statistics, 46). The following calculation shows that a reduction of this magnitude would affect approximately 7.7 million vehicles.

3% of 1,545,000,000 = 46,350,000 tonnes of CO2

46,350,000t / 6 t/vehicle = 7,725,000 vehicles

NOTE: This calculation should not be taken as exact, there are assumptions that have been made. The calculation is only to gain some perspective on the potential impact of the 450 Scenario.

Insideevs.com reports that there were 116,099 full electric vehicles sold in the United States in 2015, and 441,179 worldwide. If you linearly distribute the number of vehicles affected by the 450 Scenario on a 23-year time horizon (2017 to 2040), 7,725,000 / 23 = 335,870 vehicles per year would need to be sold, or almost 3 times the number of current sales per year.

This is provided that car demand in the United States stays where it is. If there is growth in the number of people who want to drive, this electric vehicle number would need to increase.

How does this equate to lithium demand? Well, it isn’t an easy calculation as there are a lot of assumptions, but I did find an estimate of 47 lbs (0.021 t) of lithium per Tesla Model S (sedan). If 335,870 Tesla Model S were sold in the United States in a given year, this would translate into 335,870 x 0.021 t of 7,053 t of lithium, or 37,544 t of lithium carbonate (conversion from Li to LiCO3 – 1 : 5.323)

 

To summarize this example:

  • Calculation only represents a 3% decrease in American transportation carbon emissions.
  • A 3% improvement in emissions will affect the equivalent of 7.7 million vehicles.
  • If these 7.7 million vehicles were replaced by fully electric vehicles over the next 23 years (450 scenario deadline is 2040), that would equate to 335,870 cars sold each year. In my opinion, it is highly unlikely that it will be linearly distributed.
  • Using 2015 data from insideevs.com, world demand is roughly 4 times that of the United States, thus, if the world kept pace, it would equal around 1.3 million vehicles per year.
  • In terms of lithium carbonate, 1.3 million electric vehicles could mean 150,176 t in worldwide demand.

I believe this 3% improvement scenario for vehicles per year is conservative. In reality, I think demand in the next 5 years could easily be twice as much. Deutsche Bank believes demand will hit 2.4 million in global electric vehicles sold in 2025. They estimate total demand in terms of lithium carbonate equivalent to be 534 kt, of which batteries would make up 45% (Deutsche Bank, Lithium 101 Report, 24).

The following table gives you a quick conversion factor for some common lithium compounds.

Lithium Volume Conversion Table

Source: London Stock Exchange   

FYI – A quick example: If you’re given a resource in terms of %Spodumene, 5%, and you want to convert it to %Lithium, simply multiply the 5% by the lithium conversion factor 0.038, which equals 0.19%.

 

I believe it’s undeniable that lithium will play a major role in powering our clean air future. The trend is your friend and in this case it is only the beginning of what appears to be a major turning point in the way we live our day to day lives.

 

 

Until next time,

 

Brian

 

Disclaimer: This is not an investment recommendation, it is an investment idea. I am not an investment professional and do not know your specific investment criteria. Please do your own due diligence. I have not been paid to write this article, nor do I own any of the companies listed in this report.

Posted on

North American Uranium Producers

Uranium Mining Techniques

This is a ‘For Your Information (FYI)’ style report on North American uranium producers. I’ve given a very brief overview of each company, where their assets are, the size of their resource, and a few other tidbits.  If you haven’t already, check out the in-depth articles I’ve recently written on Cameco and Energy Fuels, as well.

North American Uranium Producers

NOTE: The table above reflects MCAP and resource numbers taken at the time of the writing of the report and doesn’t necessarily reflect the current MCAP or resource numbers of the companies mentioned. Please do your own due diligence to get updated values.

 

Cameco – Link to the Report

Energy Fuels – Link to the Report

 

Denison Mines

Denison Mines is led by CEO, David Cates, who is an accountant (CPA, CA) by trade. Cates has worked in the resource sector for a number of years, previously working with Kinross and PwC LLP before joining Denison in 2008.

While Denison Mines is better known for its uranium development project, Wheeler River, it does own 22.5% part of the McClean Lake Mill. The mill processes uranium ore produced by Cameco’s McArthur River, up to 18 Mlbs/yr U3O8. The remaining 6 Mlbs/year in excess capacity has been incorporated into Denison’s PEA for Wheeler River.

The mill cash generation isn’t spectacular, but does give Denison a revenue stream regardless of the uranium price.

  • Traded on the DML:TSX, DNN:NYSE
  • Executive Chairman – Lukas Lundin
  • All properties are in Canada
  • 25% ownership of GoviEx Uranium (GXU:TSXV)
    • Sold its African uranium assets to GoviEx in exchange for ownership stake
    • GoviEx Uranium is a uranium development stage company with two permitted projects, Madaouela (Niger) and Mutanga (Zambia) – this is a bigger deal than you may think – check out my article written earlier this year.
    • Total M&I resources – 124.29 Mlbs U3O8 and Inferred resources – 73.11 Mlbs U3O8

 

 

UR-Energy

UR-Energy is led by Executive Director and Acting CEO, Jeffery Klenda. Klenda’s background is in finance, having been an officer and/or director for numerous publicly traded companies throughout his 30-year career.

UR-Energy has a hedged sales book that stretches out to 2021 (See December 2016 Corporate Presentation), meaning a percentage of its current U3O8 sales are contracted at a higher than spot uranium price and, thus, is currently producing from its main asset, Lost Creek ISR Uranium Facility.

  • Traded on the NYSE: URG and the TSE: URE
  • All properties are located in the United States:
  • Lost Creek ISR Uranium Facility (6 individual contiguous projects)
    • Facility is located in Wyoming
    • M&I Resource of 13.251 million lbs U3O8 and Inferred Resource of 6.439 million lbs (Source)
    • Newly added pounds of uranium have the potential to be pipelined to the processing facility, giving the Lost Creek property a scalability factor
  • Shirley Basin Mine Site
    • Located in Wyoming
    • Purchased from AREVA in 2013
    • Preliminary Economic Assessment was completed in Q1 2015 and a mining permit application filed in 4Q 2015.
    • Estimated total of 6.3 million lbs of U3O8 may be produced from the project
  • Lost Soldier Project
    • Located in Wyoming
    • Exploration property located 14 miles north of the Lost Creek Facility
    • Requires more funding for further exploration and development. Not a priority given the current market
  • Lucky Mc Mine Site
    • Located in Wyoming
    • Part of the Pathfinder acquisition in 2013
    • Exploration property, with past production from the 1960s through to the 1990s. Historical conventional mine production of more than 46.7 million lbs.

 

Uranium Resources

Uranium Resources is led by CEO, Christopher Jones, who has been in the mining industry for 30 years. Currently, Jones leads a business which has recently branched out from its core business in uranium and entered the lithium exploration business. Uranium Resources refers to this as their “energy metals strategy,” which is meant to capitalize on the near and the longer term. (Source – slide 10)

Uranium Resources producing uranium assets are currently on standby until there is a sustained improvement in the uranium market.  Their Turkish Temrezli property is by far their largest uranium project and is currently in the permitting stage of development.

NOTE: With its listing on the ASX, Uranium Resources is listed according to JORC standards, which are different than NI 43-101.

  • Traded on the Nasdaq: URRE and ASX: URI
  • Uranium Properties are located in the United States and Turkey:
  • Temrezli Uranium Project
    • Located in Turkey
    • 44,700 acres of prospective property
    • M&I and Inferred Resource Total of 13.3 million lbs U3O8
    • Pre-Feasibility study completed in 2015 (see presentation for further detail)
    • Permitting is underway
  • Kingsville Dome Processing Facility
    • Located in Texas, United States
    • 17,000 acres of prospective ISR projects
    • In-Place Reserves – 50,000 lbs (not NI 43-101 compliant)
    • Production suspended until “there is a sustained improvement in the uranium market” ~Uranium Resources
  • Rosita
    • Located in Texas, United States
    • In-Place Reserves – 624,000 lbs (not NI 43-101 compliant)
    • Like Kingsville, production has been suspended
  • New Mexico Projects
    • Located in New Mexico, United States
    • 190,000 acres of prospective property

 

  • Lithium Properties
    • Columbus Basin (Nina) Lithium Project
      • Located in Nevada
      • 2017 Outlook: Geophysical sampling, geological analysis and follow-up drilling
    • Sal Rica Lithium Project
      • Located in Utah
      • 2017 Outlook: Sampling, geophysics and target prioritization for drilling

 

 

Uranium Energy Corporation (UEC)

UEC is led by Amir Andani, who is also the CEO of the precious metals company, Brazil Resources. Andani has used the bear market in uranium to purchase uranium properties throughout the western United States and Paraguay.

Currently, UEC has one producing asset, Palangana, and its Hobson Processing Facility. Its other two main assets are Bruke Hollow, which is in the process of being permitted, and Goliad, which is permitted and under construction.

Andani is a premier marketer and presents UEC fantastically with their website and investor material. This type of promotion is an X-factor in the junior market and definitely sets Andani apart from his competitors, regardless of how you view the rest of the company.

  • Traded on the NYSE: UEC
  • Properties in the United States and Paraguay:
  • Hobson Processing Facility
    • Fully licensed and permitted
    • Operational
    • 2 million lbs of processing capacity per year
  • Palangana
    • Fully permitted and producing
    • Located in Texas
    • M&I resource – 1,057,00 lbs U3O8 and Inferred resource – 1,154,000 lbs U3O8
  • Burke Hollow
    • In development – permitting underway
    • Inferred resource – 5,121,853.25 lbs U3O8
  • Goliad 
    • Fully permitted and under construction
    • M&I resource – 5,475,200 lbs U3O8 and Inferred resource – 1,547,500 lbs U3O8
  • Exploration Projects:
    • Nichols (Texas)
    • Longhorn (Texas)
    • Salvo (Texas)
    • Dalton Pass (New Mexico)
    • Long Park (Colorado)
    • Slick Rock (Colorado)
    • Anderson (Arizona)
    • Los Cuatros (Arizona)
    • Workman (Arizona)
  • Oviedo
    • Exploration project in Paraguay
  • Yuty
    • Exploration project In Paraguay

 

 

Peninsula Energy Limited

Peninsula Energy is led by CEO, John Simpson. Simpson has over 25 years of experience in the management of listed mineral companies. Simpson is at the helm of a company which operates a producing uranium mine, the Lance ISR Mine in the United States, a uranium exploration property in South Africa, and a gold exploration property in Fiji.

Peninsula is unique because it boasts a hedged contract sales book that stretches 10 years and 8.1 million pounds (Mlbs) which, at maximum capacity for their processing plant, is almost 4 years of full production. With an average contracted selling price of $55 USD/pound for the 8.1 Mlbs, investors are given  a lot of risk mitigation to a sliding uranium price. However, this could also mean a loss of upside potential, depending on where you think the uranium price may go in the future.

Peninsula is traded on the ASX and, therefore, expresses all of their resources according to JORC code.

  • Traded on the ASX: PEN
  • Properties located in the United States, South Africa and Fiji (Gold Project)
  • Resources are listed by JORC Code (not NI 43-101)
    • Lance ISR Uranium Project 
      • Located in Wyoming, United States
      • Three deposits totalling 53,674,224 lbs U3O8 (JORC code resources): Ross -Measured & Indicated (M&I) and Inferred total 11,184,612 lbs U3O8, Kendrick – M&I and I total 29,617,020lbs U3O8, and Barber – M&I and Inferred total of 12,872,592 lbs U3O8
      • Fully permitted and producing
      • Exploration potential on the property
      • Production levels to follow their hedged sales book, with 400,000 lbs to be delivered in 2017 at approximately $55 USD per pound.
      • Currently, Peninsula has 8.1 million pounds of U3O8 under contract to deliver to major utilities in the United States and Europe over the next 10 years. These 5 contracts total approximately $44o million USD and an average 3O8 selling price of $55 USD per pound
      • Project is expected to produce 2,300,000 lbs U3O8 per annum at full capacity

 

  • Karoo Project (Joint Venture with BEE Groups)
    • Located in South Africa
    • Exploration property
    • JORC Code-Compliant Mineral Estimate (Indicated and Inferred) total of 56.9 million lbs of eU3O8
    • In the next 3 to 5 years, the company plans to expand this resource further, focusing drilling on the eastern sector, RystKuil channel.
  • Raki Raki Gold Project (JV – 50% ownership)
    • Located in Fiji
    • Exploration property

 

Anfield Resources Inc.

Anfield is led by CEO, Corey Dias, whose 10 years of experience prior to Anfield was in capital markets on both the buy and sell sides. Dias is leading this uranium development company to “near term” production; I use quotations because they still need to refurbish their conventional mill and acquire the proper mining licensing and permitting – ‘near term’ is subjective.

Conventional uranium mills are hard to come by in North America, therefore, owning one can be an asset, as the conventional mining of uranium is not complete with milling.  Anfield has used the uranium bear to acquire a variety of properties across the western United States which have past production and historical uranium resources.

  • Traded on the TSX Venture: ARY, Frankfurt: OAD
  • Steps to production: Well field development, mill refurbishment, and mine licensing/permitting
  • Potential uranium production across all assets – 1,500,000 lbs U3O8 per year
  • Properties located in the United States
    • Shootaring Canyon Mill
      • 750 tpd conventional uranium mill
      • Located in Utah
    • Velvet-Wood Mine
      • Located in Utah
      • M&I resource of 4.6 Mlbs U3O8 (Slide 10 )
      • Surface stockpile of 370,000 lbs U3O8
      • PEA completed in 2016
    • Exploration Properties (some properties have historical resources and past production)
      • Arizona – Brecca Pipes and Date Creek Basin
      • Colorado – Slick Rock District, Western Gypsum Valley District, Paradox District and Gateway District
      • Utah – Lisbon Valley, Henry Mountains Area, Moab Uranium District, Dry Valley Area, Paradox Area, Monticello-Cottonwood, Monticello-Motezuma Canyon, Thompson District, Green River District, White Canyon and San Rafael District
      • Wyoming – Black Hills, Great Divide Basin, Laramie Basin, Powder River Basin, Shirley Basin and Wind River Basin

 

AREVA

  • Directly or indirectly is 85.6% controlled by the French State
  • Not just a miner, they are involved in each aspect of the nuclear fuel cycle

 

Uranium One – Owned by AMRZ – Mining Arm of ROSATOM State Atomic Energy Corp.

  • State owned and controlled
  • Operations in the United States and Kazakhstan
    • Willow Creek ISR located in Wyoming with Proven and Probable (P&P) Reserves of 6,754,000 lbs U3O8, M&I of 16,798,000 lbs U3O8 and Inferred of 141,000,000 lbs of U3O8
    • Kazakhstan Properties (5 properties) have a total resource (M&I + Inferred) of 148,460 tU

 

If you believe the future is bright for uranium, but aren’t sure when the market is going to turn for the better, a producer is a great way to ride the bear market out, while having exposure to a sector that, in my opinion, could change on a dime. Each of the companies listed have merits for investment. Be objectively critical and find the company or companies that fit your personal investment criteria.

 

Until next time,

 

Brian

 

DISCLAIMER: The following is not an investment recommendation, it is an investment idea. I have not been compensated to write this article, however, I do own shares of one or more of the companies mentioned in this article. Please perform your own due diligence to decide whether it is a company that’s best suited for your personal investment criteria. All analytics were taken from the company websites and press releases.

 

Posted on

Energy Fuels: Positioned to Lead the American Uranium Renaissance

Energy Fuels

The current uranium market has, in my opinion, all the makings of the perfect contrarian investment.

  • The uranium price hit a 12-year low of $17.75 USD per lbs in these past weeks, which is close to 90% off the 2007 high – the cure for low prices is low prices.
  • The world’s electricity output has grown steadily at an average rate of 3.4% CAGR, from 2009 to 2014, in the face of turmoil following the world economic crisis that struck in the fall of 2008. (Rate calculated using data from International Energy Agency (IEA))
  •  The clean air trend has greater momentum every year, with the Paris Climate Accord, or the 450 Scenario (International Energy Agency), leading the charge to reduce carbon emissions.
  • Nuclear power generation is cheap, safe and reliable.

The uranium market is not without it detractors, but to me, it’s not if but when will the uranium market turn. The further the uranium price falls, the  further uranium companies’ share prices drop and, thus, the less risk associated with buying them.

In the famous words of Howard Marks,

“Upshot is simple: to achieve superior investment results, you have to hold non-consensus views regarding value, and they have to be accurate. That’s not easy.”
~Marks, The Most Important Thing Illuminated, pg.7

For me, waiting for the uranium market to turn from bear to bull can be done successfully by choosing companies that are able to weather the storm. What do I mean by this? Well, some uranium producers have protected themselves by hedging all or part of their sales books for the next year or so to ensure they can still operate.

Those with great properties, scalability in their production, locations in the right jurisdictions, the sales contract books to at least partially protect downside uranium price risk, and that are run by experienced and proven management will be the companies that survive and are the first to lead the bull market.

The uranium market may not change tomorrow or next week, but I do believe there is a bright future for this clean energy producing commodity.

 

It’s Gonna Be HUGE!

Let us take a look at one country in particular, a country which I believe will turn to more domestic production of uranium in the future, and to nuclear power for its clean energy production.

An American Ressainance in Uranium

If you’ve haven’t already guessed, the country I’m referring to is the United States, and as you can see from the table below, they are the world’s largest generator of nuclear power. Interestingly enough, however, they are only the world’s 9th largest uranium producer.

What does this mean? The United States is required to import the vast majority of their uranium needs, as can be seen in the table from the USA Energy Information Agency’s breakdown of the purchased uranium in years 2011 to 2015. Specifically, refer to the data in ‘purchased from foreign suppliers’ and you will see that the U.S. purchased the vast majority of their uranium from foreign entities in 2015.

Top 10 Nuclear Power Generating Countries
Source: International Energy Agency – 2016 Key World Energy Statistics – pg.17

 

Uranium Mine Production by Country
Source: World Nuclear Association
U.S. Uranium Purchases 2011 to 2015
Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration

 

Who did the United States import their uranium from? Take a look at the pie chart below:

U.S. Uranium Import Sources
U.S. Energy Information Administration

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration

The effect that president elect Donald Trump will have on the American economy has yet to reveal itself. From the statements he made during his campaign, however, we know of a few things that could happen:

  • Re-negotiate North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)
    • Canada is the U.S.’ #1 trading partner and its #1 supplier of uranium. If the re-negotiation adds a tariff to imported Canadian uranium, U.S. utilities will be looking internally for a cheaper source.
  • Relations with Russia
    • It’s hard to say where this will go, but if tensions were to increase with Russia, it’s my contention that their supply of uranium to the U.S. may end.  The same could be said for the former Soviet States, Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan.
  • Made in America
    • Trump’s platform was “to make America great again,” and my guess is that this will include producing more of their goods within their borders. In particular, I believe there will be a push to produce more uranium within the country, creating more jobs and more security of supply.

 

 

Energy Fuels, America’s Next Leader in Domestic Uranium Production

The push for further domestic production will start with one of North America’s largest domestic uranium companies Energy Fuels. Energy Fuels is a uranium producer headquartered in Lakewood, Colorado, and with its producing assets in the western part of the United States. Its primary operations are as follows:

    • White Mesa Mill (Utah) – Only licensed and operating conventional mill in the USA.
    • Nichols Ranch Processing Facility (Wyoming) – In-Situ Recovery (ISR) of uranium
    • Alta Mesa Project (Texas) – In-Situ Recovery (ISR) of uranium

Let’s take a look at the reasons I believe Energy Fuels is set to weather the bear market storm.

The Energy Fuels Team

The Energy Fuels team is led by President and Chief Executive Officer (CEO), Stephen P. Antony. Antony has led Energy Fuels since his appointment in 2010. He’s a graduate of the Colorado School of Mines, originally trained as an engineer. He also holds a Masters of Business Administration from the University of Denver.

Antony has been in the mining industry for 39 years, and his start in the uranium business was with the mining arm of Mobil Oil, where he developed the reclamation plan for Mobil’s El Mesquite ISR operation in Texas. His next years were spent in managerial roles with Energy Fuels Nuclear, where he held the position of Director of Technical Services and with Power Resources Inc., where he was Vice-President of Business Development. Antony then consulted for Cameco as they completed their due diligence on Power Resources before their take over. Finally, in 2005, Antony was back with Energy Fuels as Chief Operating Office (COO), in charge of all the day-to-day operations of the corporation, production and exploration.

Antony has a great mixture of technical and managerial experience, and with 39 years in the business, he is certainly in the right position at the helm of America’s largest domestic uranium company.

My personal work experience is in operations, so I’m probably a little biased in my belief that operations, next to the CEO, are  the most important positions at a company. Energy Fuels has split their head operational position into 2 Executive Vice-President (VP) roles.

First, Harold R. Roberts is VP of Conventional Operations. Roberts is a trained engineer, having graduated from Montana State University in 1975. He has held many operational type roles throughout his career, from operations oversight to project development, as well as executive positions with Denison Mines, as Executive VP of U.S. Operations, and Energy Fuels Nuclear as President. Roberts’ work experience sets him up well for his operational role at Energy Fuels.

Secondly, W. Paul Goranson is VP of ISR Operations. Goranson is a trained engineer and possesses both an undergraduate and a Master’s degree from Texas A&M. Goranson has 28 years of experience in the uranium industry. Before joining Energy Fuels, he held executive roles with Uranez Energy Corporation, where he was COO and Director, Cameco Resources, where he was President, Mestena Uranium LLC, where he was VP, and finally, Rio Algom Mining and Uranium Resource Inc, where he held senior positions.

Energy Fuels is led by a seasoned group of uranium professionals, giving the company a solid footing during these hard days in the uranium business. Their business plans have thus far kept Energy Fuels profitable, and have set them up well for the upcoming bull.

Making America Great Again

It’s widely thought that North America is one of the best places for mining investment in the world. This is with good reason, as in our present moment in history, North America provides mining companies with a good legal system, relatively stable politics and a reliable workforce.

President Elect Trump is a wild card of sorts, and time will tell whether his proclamations will result in triumph or disaster, or maybe both, depending on your perspective. Only weeks after his win, it appears general consensus is that nuclear power will get a boost from Trump’s presidency.

Although the future is cloudy, I do believe that North America is your best bet from a jurisdictional perspective for uranium investment. The first part of this article describes the reasons I believe American uranium companies in particular will prosper in the years ahead.

Let us take a look at Energy Fuels’ presence in the United States and why they present the best bang for your investment buck for the American uranium companies.

 

Energy Fuels Properties

Located in Utah, White Mesa Mill is a conventional operation and the only licensed and operational mill in the United States. For those who aren’t familiar with the nuclear fuel cycle, let’s take a quick look.

Nuclear Fuel Cycle
Nuclear Fuel Cycle

A mill is integral to the cycle because yellowcake is produced through the milling process. Without it, uranium ore can‘t be converted into uranium hexafloride.

Conventional Uranium Mining

The White Mesa Mill has a licensed capacity of 8 million pounds (Mlbs) of uranium per annum and is centralized within the area where Energy Fuel’s high grade uranium mines are located.  Also, it possesses separate circuits to process high-purity vanadium and an alternate feed circuit, which produces uranium from other uranium-bearing  materials (don’t come from conventional ore). The alternate feed circuits are supplying Energy Fuels with profits during a dismal uranium market and represent a huge advantage to Energy Fuels when compared to its competitors.

Some food for thought, vanadium is extensively used within the steel industry as an alloying element, and is also a part of new battery technology, as it’s used with lithium to produce a powerful, safe and reliable battery solution.

PUSH:  Some push going into 2017 is the income generated from Energy Fuel’s new alternate feed contract, which was announced on October 31, 2016.

 

Mine Sites

Energy Fuels has a wide range of properties throughout the western United States. Let’s look at the conventional properties, first. Conventional uranium mining means that they mine uranium ore in an open pit or underground. The White Mesa Mill is the centrepiece for these mines, as all of the ore is trucked to the mill for processing.

Canyon Mine

  • Conventional development property located in Arizona
  • Inferred resource of 1.6 Mlbs
  • Extensive high grade copper mineralization (averaging 8.75%) was found (News Release). The plan is to expand the scope of the evaluation of the Canyon deposit, as this new discovery has the potential to make the economics of the project even better.  The further exploration of this target comes at a cost, as seen in the Q3 results, but it’s well worth it in my opinion, as a high grade copper by-product from this uranium mine could add a ton of value.
  • Production could start as early as 2017, with the ore being shipped to White Mesa for processing

Sheep Mountain

  • Conventional development property located in Wyoming – Currently, permitting for surface and underground mining
  • Probable reserves of 18.4 Mlbs U3O8, Indicated resource of 30.3 Mlbs U3O8
  • With a proposed maximum output of 1.5 Mlbs per annum

Henry Mountains Complex

  • Conventional property located in Utah, with close proximity to the White Mesa Mill. The Tony M mine is on standby, but fully permitted, while the Bullfrog portion of the project is still in permitting
  • Indicated resource of 12.8 Mlbs U3O8 and an Inferred resource of 8.1 Mlbs U3O8

La Sal Complex

  • The La Sal Complex is made up of a series of uranium/vanadium mines in Utah. These include: Beaver, Pandora, La Sal, Energy Queen and Red Clock projects
  • Beaver and Pandora are fully permitted and developed
  • Currently on standby
  • Measured and Indicated resource of 4.1 Mlbs U3O8 and 21.5 Mlbs of vanadium, and an Inferred resource of 0.4 Mlbs U3O8 and 1.9 Mlbs of vanadium

Whirlwind

  • Uranium/vanadium mine located on the Colorado/Utah border.
  • Fully permitted and developed
  • Currently on standby
  • Indicated resource of 1.0 Mlbs U3O8 and 3.3 Mlbs vanadium, and an Inferred resource of 2.0 Mlbs U3O8 and 6.8 Mlbs vanadium

Daneros

  • A uranium mine located in Utah, close to White Mesa Mill
  • Fully permitted and developed
  • Currently on standby
  • Inferred resource of 0.7 Mlbs U3O8

Roca Honda

  • Conventional property located in New Mexico, but within trucking distance to the White Mesa Mill. The project is still in permitting
  • Measured and Indicated resource of 14.8 Mlbs U3O8 and an Inferred resource of 11.2 Mlbs U3O8
  • PEA describes 2.6 Mlbs of production per year

Wate

  • Conventional property located in Arizona, but is within trucking distance to the White Mesa Mill. The project is in permitting
  • Inferred resource of 1.1 Mlbs U3O8

Energy Fuels also has a couple of other conventional development properties that are on a smaller scale: Sage Plain and EZ Complex. Check out their details here

 

In-Situ Recovery (ISR) Operations

Energy Fuels operates and owns ISR operations in the western United States, giving the company a portion of their U3O8 at a very low cost of production.

Nichols Ranch ISR Mine and Plant

  • Located in the Powder River Basin, Wyoming
  • Hank, Jane Dough properties are a part of Nichols Ranch
  • Fully licensed
  • 2 Mlbs of U3O8 per annum capacity
  • Measured and Indicated resource of 2.8 Mlbs U3O8
  • Resource expansion possibilities

Alta Mesa ISR Mine and Plant

  • Located in Texas
  • Purchased earlier this year (Mestena acquisition)
  • Fully licensed
  • 1.5 Mlbs of U3O8 per annum capacity
  • Currently on standby
  • Measured and Indicated resource of 3.6 Mlbs and an Inferred resource of 16.8 Mlbs

Energy Fuel’s owns a few ISR development properties, which are: Reno Creek, West North Butte, North Rolling Pin, and Arkose Mining Venture. For more information on these properties, check this out.

In total, Energy Fuels covers all of the bases with their ISR and conventional mining properties. The ISR projects provide the company with a low cost source of U3O8, which is particularly important in today’s price environment.

Not only is Energy Fuels one of America’s largest domestic uranium companies, but it has the potential to get even larger with there being a possibility for an expandable resource at a number of their properties. Available multiple million pounds in the ground and the ability to produce U3O8 up to 11.5 Mlbs per year, Energy Fuels has the horse power to respond to the growing domestic demand for uranium in the years ahead.

 

Author’s Note

As I mentioned earlier, my work experience was in the steel manufacturing business, and after the economic calamity of 2008, production at the plant where I worked was cut by 50% and stayed that way up until last year. With an increasing gap between the Canadian and U.S. dollars, more production tons were shifted to our plant in Canada.

To some, adding 25% more production should be easy, just flick the switch. But, what’s overlooked is the plant’s labour force, which was laid off during the downturn, leaving the plant with a senior workforce (unionized, senior members weren’t laid off). The issue with this scenario is that when it came time to add an additional crew, we had to train new workers in record time and fill in for the slew of retirements that removed experienced workers from a workforce that was largely baby boomers.

My point is this, it’s fantastic that there’s room to grow as the market turns, however, it isn’t always as easy as flicking a switch, because laid off employees don’t always return, and training new employees can be complex, depending on the process.

 

Financials

On November 3rd, Energy Fuels announced its 3rd quarter results.

Antony stated in the news release:

 “In light of today’s uncertain uranium market, Energy Fuels is intently focused on preserving, and in the case of Canyon, enhancing the value of the Company’s uranium assets.  We feel that the Company is well placed in the global uranium sector with multiple, 100%-owned production opportunities, which collectively have the potential to produce a large quantity of low-cost uranium in diverse ways in an improved market.  Moreover, the Company is working diligently to strike the correct balance between growing our production capabilities, maintaining visibility in global uranium markets, advancing high-priority development and permitting activities, and sustaining the financial health of the Company.  We believe our new Business Plan will upgrade and improve the quality of our portfolio of, producing, and permitted assets, while also maintaining and improving Energy Fuels’ sustainability, so our shareholders are in a position to benefit from the expected uranium market recovery.”

Here’s a summary of the news release highlights:

  • Gross profit of $3.0 million USD from mining and milling operations (34% gross profit margin)
    • Energy Fuels has a sales contract book that runs until 2020. Starting next year, in 2017, and working towards 2020, they have fewer tons contractually sold each year. This strategy leaves them open to upside in the uranium price, while protecting against downside.
    • To note, Energy Fuels’ sales contracts are completed at fixed prices, therefore, allowing the company to predict future cash flows against current operating costs.
  • Recovered 350,000 pounds of U3O8 during the quarter, 90,000 lbs from ISR and 260,000 lbs from conventional sources.
  • Implementation of cost cutting measures such as: sale or abandonment of certain non-core properties, sale of excess mining equipment and the Board of Directors have decided to reduce their total compensation by 20%.
  • Energy Fuels has re-jigged some of their contract deliveries, moving 300,000 lbs that were originally scheduled for 2017 to November 15, 2016.
  • A net loss of $8.2 million USD, $1.4 million USD impairment of inventory, and $6.3 million USD of development (permitting and land holding costs)
    • Development costs were for well-field construction at Nichols Ranch and continued shaft-sinking at the Canyon project (evaluation of high grade copper discovery)
    • In a letter released September 22, 2016, CEO Stephen Antony discusses the current uranium market and why the company completed a 2nd financing ($15 million USD) this year. This letter is well worth the read, as Antony draws on his experience to explain current market dynamics and outlines where Energy Fuels is headed.  Personally, I like the direction in which they’re headed; development and acquisition of properties is best done when the demand for your product isn’t there, just like being a contrarian investor and buying in a down market. When the market turns, Energy Fuels will be ready to rock, with their best properties ready to produce uranium ore.

 

Energy Fuels’ 3rd quarter financial results are reflective of a dismal market, one in which they produced profits from an operational perspective, but because the company has chosen to march ahead with the development of their other high potential properties, has incurred a net loss.

Even if the market doesn’t turn, Energy Fuels has efficient conventional and ISR projects that should give the company a healthy metal spread in the years ahead. Along with the additional income from their alternate feed circuits, Energy Fuels is poised to stick around for the boom.

 

Comparison to its Peers

North American Uranium Producers

NOTE: MCAP numbers may have changed since the writing of this article, please do your own due diligence and check. All other analytics are from the company websites.

To get an idea of how Energy Fuels stacks up against its peers, take a look at the table above. In a simple calculation of MCAP to total (reserves and resources) uranium, Energy Fuels is clearly undervalued.  Other than Cameco, Energy Fuels has the most production upside capability, along with the largest total uranium resources, giving it the ability to capitalize to a greater extent on a change in market sentiment.

 

Cash Generation Calculation

Energy Fuels is licensed to produce 11.5 Mlbs of uranium per year. Current market conditions have forced the company to cut back production to around 1 Mlbs per year. Outside of their developments cost, Energy Fuels has the ability to generate cash through its operations.

  • 1st quarter gross profit margin of 33%, 2nd quarter gross profit margin of 18% and a 3rd quarter profit margin of 34%. Average Profit margin for the year 28%.
  • The White Mesa Mill has an annual capacity of 8 Mlbs, but for the sake of this calculation, let’s be conservative and say that full capacity during an up market is 5 Mlbs, or roughly 62.5% of capacity
  • The ISR plants (Nichols and Alta Mesa) have a cumulative capacity of 3.5 Mlbs per year; let’s use the same conservative estimate and say that at full capacity the ISR plants will produce 2.2 Mlbs per year.
  • Therefore, in total, Energy Fuels will produce 7.2 Mlbs in this hypothetical bull market scenario
  • For the sake of this calculation, let’s use today’s approximate average sale price of $55 USD per pound

7.2 Mlbs x 55 $ USD /lbs = $396,000,000 USD

$396,000,000 x 0.28 = $110,880,000 USD in operational cash generation

 

Now, to put this in perspective, Energy Fuels’ current MCAP is roughly $111 million USD and this conservative example shows a cash generation of $110.8 million USD. If you consider that a portion of Energy Fuels’ sales will be at higher prices in the coming bull market, this number grows quite easily. Also, this example assumes a 62.5% capacity utilization, which may or may not be conservative, but there’s certainly room to grow to Energy Fuels’ licensed capacity of 11.5 Mlbs.

As with the 3rd quarter results, Energy Fuels will have development and permitting costs to pay over the next few years, but this money is well spent as it will bring on more capacity, fuelling American nuclear reactors for years to come.

 

Buying Value at a Discount

Looking to invest in the uranium space but are lukewarm about when the bear market will end? While Energy Fuels isn’t without risk because they are spending cash in the midst of a bear market to purchase great properties and to further explore, permit and develop high potential properties, Energy Fuels, in my mind, is well worth a look – they boast the following strengths:

  • Experienced management team
  • Undervalued, MCAP to Resources Ratio, compared to their North American peers
  • They have a hedged sales contract book with orders confirmed to 2020. That said, not all of their production is contractually sold, giving them plenty of upside to a rising uranium price in the future.
  • Largest American uranium company by resource size
  • Production scalability –  with a license to produce 11.5 Mlbs per year, there’s plenty of upside to fulfill demand. Many properties have the potential to expand their resource without the need for M&A.
  • All operations are in the western United States

Energy Fuels is ready to fuel America’s uranium renaissance. Invest ahead of the crowd and be a contrarian!

 

Until next time,

 

Brian Leni   P.Eng

Founder – Junior Stock Review

 

 

Disclaimer: This is not an investment recommendation, it is an investment idea. I am not an investment professional and do not know your specific investment needs. Please do your own due diligence. I have not been compensated to write this article and do not own shares of Energy Fuels.

 

 

 

Posted on

Waking the Giant: A Look at Cameco in Today’s Uranium Market & Going Forward

Cameco logo

Disclaimer: The following is not an investment recommendation, it is an investment idea. I have not been compensated to write this review, however, I do own shares in this company. Please perform your own due diligence to decide whether it is a company that’s best suited for your personal investment criteria. All Cameco Corporation analytics were taken from their website and press releases.

 

The uranium price continues to make new lows, and in the midst of this carnage, a slumbering giant is still making its shareholders money. Cameco’s 3rd quarter results, released last week, surprised many in the midst of such dismal prospects.

This report takes a look at the current Cameco story, specifically the people who manage this uranium company, the properties and the jurisdictions in which they’re located, and how Cameco is weathering a falling uranium price. This analysis also sheds light on the reasons I think Cameco will be the leader when this long uranium bear market comes to an end.

 

The People at the Helm of Cameco

Unlike junior companies which, for all intents and purposes, are only as strong as the people who manage them, the executive personnel in senior companies with producing assets aren’t always considered to be as vital to the company’s success. When a stalwart executive group is at the helm of a big company like Cameco, however, it can make all the difference in the world.  Let us take a look at what I believe is a great mix of business and real world uranium mining experience.

Cameco’s management is headed by Chief Executive Officer (CEO), Tim Gitzel, who took the reins back in July of 2011. Gitzel has a law degree from the University of Saskatchewan and possesses 25 years of combined experience in senior management and legal experience. Before joining Cameco, Gitzel was the Executive Vice-President (VP) of AREVA’s mining business unit based in Paris, France, later becoming President and CEO of AREVA’s Canadian subsidiary. Gitzel’s working experience has set him up well for his current position at the top of the world’s 2nd largest uranium company.

Gitzel’s operational team is led by Chief Operating Officer (COO), Robert Steane, who worked his way up the corporate ladder from Assistant Mill Superintendent to his appointment as Senior VP and COO in May of 2010. Speaking from my own experience, having worked in the steel manufacturing industry for several years, the best operational management comes from those who have worked their way up from the ‘floor’ to the c-suite. Hands on ‘floor’ experience can never be replicated in a class room, and in Cameco’s case, they have chosen well, promoting Steane from within to lead their operations.

Rounding out the most important positions in Gitzel’s team is Chief Financial Officer (CFO), Grant Issac. Issac holds a BA and MA in economics from the University of Saskatchewan and a PhD from the London School of Economics. Before joining Cameco, Issac was a professor and Dean of the Edward School of Business at the University of Saskatchewan. Issac was appointed Senior VP and CFO of Cameco in July of 2011, where he oversees finance, tax, treasury, investor relations, strategy and risk, and marketing for Cameco Inc. and Nukem.

The Cameco team is built around experience in the industry, and in my opinion, it will be what powers them through what is currently a very tough uranium market.

 

Cameco’s Producing Properties

Cameco’s properties have a combined Proven and Probable Reserve total of 410 million pounds (Mlbs). Further, they have 377 Mlbs in Measured and Indicated resources and an Inferred total resource of 381 Mlbs.  Cameco’s 3 largest producing mines are giants next to their peers. Let’s take a look:

Top 15 Uranium Mines in the World
Source: Word Nuclear Association

 

McArthur River and Cigar Lake are not only Cameco’s largest producing assets, but the largest producing mines in the world. McArthur River and Cigar Lake are a part of Saskatchewan’s Athabasca Basin, which is home to some of the highest grade uranium mines in the world.

By the numbers:

McArthur River

  • Proven & Probable reserves of 234.9 Mlbs @ 10.94% (average grade U3O8) – more than 50% of Cameco’s reserves
  • Underground mine
  • 70% owned by Cameco

Cigar Lake

  • Proven and Probable reserves of 110.9 Mlbs @ 16.7% (average grade U3O8)
  • Underground mine
  • 50% owned by Cameco

 

Cameco’s third largest producing asset is a joint venture located in Kazakhstan, named Inkai. While not a high grade uranium source, the uranium in the Inkai deposit is extracted using In-Situ Recovery, a very low cost form of mining.

Inkai

  • Proven and Probable reserves – 43.1 Mlbs
  • In-Situ Recovery
  • 60% owned by Cameco

 

NOTE: On April 21, 2016, Cameco announced that it would be suspending production at its Rabbit Lake operation.

 

Prospective Properties

Milliennium

Cameco’s Millennium uranium project is a joint venture (Cameco owns 69.9%) with Areva and is located in the Athabasca Basin in northern Saskatchewan. It contains an Indicated resource of 53.0 Mlbs at an average grade of 2.39% U3O8 and an Inferred resource of 20.2 Mlbs, average grade of 3.19% U3O8.

As stated on the Cameco website, regarding work at Millennium,

“[N]o work is planned for 2016, as regulatory activity related to our final environmental impact statement continues to be on hold. Further progress towards a development decision is not expected until market conditions improve.” ~ Cameco

Given the current uranium market and the need to tie up regulatory requirements for the project, Millennium will wait for development until the market turns from bear to bull.

 

Kintyre

Cameco’s Kintyre uranium project is a joint venture (Cameco owns 70%) with Mitsubishi Development Pty Ltd. and is located in the Pibara region of Western Australia. It contains a Measured and Indicated (M&I) resource of 53.5 Mlbs U3O8.

The Kintyre project is advance-staged and has completed a prefeasibility study, community engagement and education program and signed an Indigenous Land Use Agreement with traditional owners, the Martu.

Although this project appears to be ready for construction, it may be a while before Cameco gives the green light, given the current uranium market.

 

Yeelirrie

Cameco’s Yeelirrie uranium project is 100% owned and located in Western Australia. It contains a M&I resource of 127.3 Mlbs, with an average grade of 0.16% U3O8.  This past summer, Cameco had Western Australia’s Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) do an assessment of the Yeelirrie project. The EPA evaluated the property against 9 criteria. Cameco reports on the results of the assessment on the Cameco Australia website,

“The EPA has determined that eight of the nine key environmental factors at Yeelirrie can be managed to meet the EPA’s objectives. For one factor, subterranean fauna, the EPA was not satisfied with what was proposed.” ~ Cameco Australia

Cameco will have to find a way to effectively deal with the subterranean fauna before they will have any hope of constructing a mine here. What’s the likelihood that they will be able to deal with this set back? I’m not really sure, more research is needed, but given the uranium price, I don’t believe bringing this asset to production is a very high priority.

 

Although Cameco’s business is highlighted by the strength of its mining operations, they’re involved in and excel at each aspect of the nuclear fuel cycle, from conversion to fuel rod assembly. Their nuclear fuel facilities are exclusive to Canada, or more specifically, Ontario. For those familiar with the geography of Southern Ontario, 3 of the 4 nuclear fuel facilities are actually situated in the Port Hope/Cobourg region, which is about a 1.5 hour drive east of Toronto.

Also to note, Cameco does have a 24% interest in the experimental Global Laser Enrichment facility in the United States. They are partnered with GE and Hitachi in this endeavour.

Cameco is truly an international company, but does have the bulk of its operations in North America, and specifically Canada. From a jurisdictional perspective, Cameco’s risky assets are in Kazakhstan. In relative terms, however, the Inkai mine makes up 10.5% of Cameco’s uranium reserves, and while this would certainly impact the company if it were compromised, it’s a small part of the company’s business as a whole.

Why do I consider Kazakhstan to be risky? There are a couple of reasons; Firstly, Kazakhstan uranium is primarily mined by a state-owned company called, KazAtomProm. Any time an industry is controlled by a government, I’m concerned about the possibility that the resource (asset) will be nationalized at some point. Second, with Kazakhstan being a former Soviet state, I wonder where allegiances will lie if tensions rose between Russia and the rest of the world – I wrote about this in part 3B of the Uranium series.

 

NUKEM

If you have explored Cameco quarterly news releases, you may be wondering about NUKEM. Prior to being purchased by Cameco in 2012 for USD $136 million, NUKEM Energy group had been involved in the nuclear energy industry for more than 50 years. NUKEM acted as an intermediary in the commercial nuclear fuel market, concentrating primarily on the purchase and sale of uranium concentrates U3O8, UF6 and enriched uranium product (EUP). Cameco has kept the NUKEM offices in Germany and the United States.

Further information on NUKEM can be found in the report, here

 

 

A Look at How Cameco is Surviving the Bear Market

How is Cameco fairing in this uranium bear market? I had the chance to correspond with Senior Communications Specialist, Carey Hyndman, last month:

 

  1. Cameco’s uranium selling prices are protected to a certain degree with a price hedge, as outlined in the price sensitivity section of the 6Q. That said, when does the decision to cut production at these lower trending spot prices become a reality?

 

Hyndman: “The uranium price sensitivity table is based on our portfolio of contracts, where we have an average of 27M lbs in sales commitments over the 5-year period shown. It isn’t evenly distributed, but heavily committed through 2018 and declining in 2019 and 2020 to arrive at that average. We are cautiously preparing for a scenario where the market remains lower for longer and on that basis, our strategy is to profitably produce from only our tier-one assets, at a pace aligned with market signals, to increase long-term shareholder value. This means maintaining flexibility to increase or decrease production, but it depends on the market conditions.”

 

My Comments:

Commodity price hedging is fairly common for the largest producers in the resource sector, and it certainly protects against downside risk, but it also limits their upside potential in a raging bull market. In this case, I think Cameco has done a fine job protecting themselves from a massive slide in the uranium price, by hedging their sales portfolio.

Let us take a look at Cameco’s performance by the numbers in 2015:

  • Produced – 28.4 Mlbs U3O8
  • Average realized sale price per pound – $57.58 CDN
  • Revenue – $2.8 billion
  • Gross Profit – $697 million
  • 2016 YTD – Quarter by Quarter – Taken from Cameco News Releases, please review reports for further details, this is only meant to be a high level look at the quarterly financials:
    • 1st Quarter – 3 months ending March 31, 2016 – Revenue $408 million / Gross Profit $118 millon / Net Earning (loss) in $ per share (diluted) 0.20
    • 2nd Quarter – 3 months ending June 30, 2016 – Revenue $466 million / Gross Profit $43 million / Net Earning (loss) in $ per share (diluted) (0.35)
    • 3rd Quarter – 3 months ending Sept 30, 2016 – Revenue $670 million / Gross Profit $146 million / Net Earning (loss) in $ per share (diluted) 0.36

I believe this performance – in what is widely thought to be the 2 worst years of the uranium business in decades – to be proof that Cameco can survive and profit in the face of adversity.

 

  1. With an exploration budget greater than 2015, yet a lower 2016 trending uranium price, how is Cameco’s exploration work affected?

Hyndman: “You’ve seen our exploration program decline significantly, from a spend of $97 million in 2012, to under $50 million this year, so exploration has been significantly impacted. The budget process for 2017 is currently underway.”

 

  1. In a lower trending uranium price market, why does Cameco choose to invest in exploration rather than purchasing an outlined resource?

Hyndman: “You’ve seen our exploration program decline significantly, from a spend of $97 million in 2012, to under $50 million this year, so exploration has been significantly impacted. We continue to believe that our pipeline of advanced exploration projects including Millennium, Kintyre and Yeelirrie, as well as the other deposits where we have an interest, are best in class. On the M&A side, junior companies, including exploration plays and those that consider themselves developers, must compete against our internal suite of projects and mine expansion opportunities, and we have not seen anything that we think will add more value than what we already have.”

 

  1. Considering Russia’s decision to suspend their weapons grade plutonium down blending deal with the US (Oct.3/16 News Release), do you foresee this having a positive effect for Cameco’s primary uranium supply? If so, how?

Hyndman: “This was a headline in the context of political implications, not due to a potential impact on the uranium market. At the moment, only a very small quantity of MOX fuel (mixed oxide, where plutonium is recycled into reactor fuel) is produced globally, and the Russian proportion would only be a small piece of that. With a significant amount of oversupply in the market today, we would not anticipate much of an impact on the primary supply market.”

 

  1. In the 6Q uranium market update, you reference a few positives for uranium demand; Japanese reactor stress testing and new reactor construction. In the short term (1 to 2 years), does Cameco foresee any other catalysts for an increase in uranium demand? If so, please explain.

Hyndman: “Demand is fairly predictable: national energy policies are widely known, plans for reactors are published, and it’s generally reported when a reactor construction project begins and when reactors come online. The catalysts you listed are the ones we’re watching – Japanese reactors need to get on a sustained path for restarting (which would impact market sentiment), and we need to see continued construction of new reactors around the world, particularly in China, India and South Korea. As overall demand grows, and the excess inventory and oversupply that has built up over the past 5 years clears the market, we are then watching for a return to long-term contracting and more concern around security of supply. However, in the meantime, we’re keeping an eye on primary supply performance, as there has yet to be a significant supply reaction to the current oversupply situation.”

 

 

Issues with the CRA

Cameco has been in the news as of late, with their public battle with the Canadian Revenue Agency (CRA) over a potential $2.2 billion tax bill. The Financial Post reports in their October 3, 2016 article,

“At question is whether Saskatoon-based Cameco Corp. set up a subsidiary in low-tax Switzerland and sold it uranium at a low price simply to avoid tax, as the CRA contends. Cameco maintains it was a legal and sound business practice.” ~The Financial Post

In 1999, Cameco Europe Ltd. was established in Zug, Switzerland (Low Corporate Taxes).  As reported by the Globe and Mail,

“Cameco then signed a 17-year deal to take the uranium it produces in Canada and sell it to Cameco Europe before it made its way to the end customer.” ~Globe and Mail

The CRA’s reassessment of Cameco taxes for 2003, 2005 and 2006 tax years are being appealed in tax court now, with the court’s decision to come early next year. On their websites, Cameco outlines that the worst case scenario for them is,

“[O]ver time we would be required to pay cash taxes and transfer pricing penalties of between $1.5 billion and $1.7 billion, plus interest and instalment penalties. These payments cover the period 2003 to 2015.” ~ Cameco

My take on this situation; In the end, I think Cameco will have to pay some percentage of the monies in question to the CRA. Interestingly, Cameco isn’t the only resource company that’s in the midst of a major tax dispute with the CRA; Silver Wheaton is also in a public battle.

I believe this tax dispute trend isn’t going away any time soon, as governments around the world continue to spend money that they don’t have. Their only option, besides raising taxes, is to hire more people to question the tax returns of their citizens and corporations.

No matter the outcome, Cameco is still the major player in the uranium sector, and in my opinion, has the balance sheet to deal with whatever the courts decide. With the down trodden uranium price and this negative press, Cameco’s share price seems like a tremendous buy.

PUSH: Next spring, when this tax dispute is finalized by the courts, I’m of the opinion that Cameco’s stock will be re-evaluated to the upside.

 

 

Cameco Comparables

CCO – TSX Listing

MCAP – CDN $4, 975, 112, 002 (at the time of writing)

Price to Book – 0.914

Yield – 3.26%

52-Week High – CDN $17.67

52-Week Low – CDN $9.88

 

It’s incredibly hard to try to compare Cameco to its peers; If you consider the top 10 uranium producers in the world, most are state-owned and controlled, and the others, specifically BHP Billiton and Rio Tinto, don’t have businesses that revolve solely around uranium.

AREVA is probably the closest comparison because it’s involved in each part of the nuclear fuel cycle, but the French state controls, directly or indirectly, 86.52% of AREVA, making it, as far as I’m concerned, an unfair comparison.

In reality, Cameco is the largest publicly traded uranium company in the world and really has no direct comparisons. Instead, I believe Cameco’s value is better evaluated on the assets that it possesses and the people in management.

  • The top 2 producing uranium mines in the world (a 3rd in the top 10)
  • Proven and well established executive leadership – Gitzel, Steane and Issac
  • Cash generation in a down market – Hedged sales book protects against a falling uranium price
  • Not just a miner, but involved in all aspects of the nuclear fuel cycle
  • Good portfolio of undeveloped properties in great jurisdictions
  • Dividend paid quarterly

PUSH: In my opinion, even at these low uranium prices, Cameco is under-valued at its current MCAP. The market, however, can remain irrational longer than most of us can remain solvent, meaning this push may take a little while. That said, when uranium is looked upon with a little more positivity, I believe Cameco will lead the way in gains.

 

 

To me, choosing to invest in Cameco now does come with the risk of further negative sentiment toward the uranium sector, via a falling uranium price. As stated earlier in the report, however, Cameco’s executives have done a great job of protecting against this downside risk.

If money is made on the delta between price and value, Cameco is a company which possesses great value at its current price. Invest opposite to the crowd and take a look at Cameco – the uranium industry’s GIANT!

 

 

Until next time,

 

Brian Leni   P.Eng

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted on

Speculator, a Compelling Piece of Fiction that’s as Much About Philosophy & Free-Market Principles as it is Speculation

My introduction to the junior resource market and my outlook on the world were heavily influenced by Doug Casey. Without a doubt, I wouldn’t be where I am today were it not for the impression he made. I’ve read virtually every book Casey has written, so I was intrigued, to say the least, when I heard he would be releasing a fictional story about speculation.

It’s funny how things seem to pop into your life at just the right moment, because in the case of Speculator, the philosophical narrative really resonated with me. In part, I’m sure it has something to do with the types of projects I’m currently working on, but also because it’s written in true Casey style.

 

Speculator Review

Doug Casey and John Hunt’s collaboratively written, Speculator, is the answer to those looking for an education in junior mining stock speculation – with a twist. What makes this book especially interesting is that it offers a reprieve from the sometimes boring confines of non-fiction writing with some fantastic story telling.

Speculator tells the story of Charles Knight, a young speculator, and his adventures in the fictional West African nation of Gondwana. Knight is drawn to Gondwana to investigate a junior gold company, B-F  Explorations, in which he holds a large speculative position.

What Knight finds during his time in Gondwana, however, will change his life forever; by following his instincts, he uncovers a fraud that will put his life and the people he cares about in jeopardy. His plan to expose this fraud navigates the ironic and idiotic nature of our governing bodies, and how doing the so to speak ‘right thing,’ really doesn’t do any good for anyone.

 

Questioning Social Norms

Knight’s adventure intertwines with a few different plot narratives, which discuss some very important social concepts that are so often overlooked or considered too ‘politically incorrect’ to broach. In my opinion, this is where Casey and Hunt are at their best, providing commentary that anyone not completely sold on social norms will find particularly thought-provoking.

This paragraph stood out for me as both a lesson in speculation and in life:

“Most people, navigating the waters of life, seemed sonar directed, setting their course based on what the rest of the school of fish was doing. These sonar-directed types spent their days pinging their surrounding, turning-often suddenly and without understanding why-when everyone else turned. Perhaps if they turned fast enough the ones on the edges would get eaten, instead of them. It was safer, but the crowd, necessarily, always got average results. And occasionally the entire mass got swallowed whole.” ~ Casey, Hunt. Speculator, 91 (PDF Version)

Knight encounters a number of challenges that test his moxie, as he must decide how far he’s willing to go to ensure B-F’s fraud is uncovered and his profits maximized. The adventure concludes fantastically, fraught with death, love and taxes (so to speak).

 

The People & Experiences that Shape Our Lives

The principles you choose to live by reflect who you are, and essentially, where your life will lead. I can hear Casey’s voice in almost every one of the characters in this book, and for me, they provide excellent thinking points, or words to live by.

There are two characters, in particular, that play a major role in shaping Knight’s character:

 

Uncle Maurice is really much more than an uncle, as Knight uses him as a barometer for his actions throughout the story. Maurice empowers his nephew to follow his dreams, to live life by a set of principles that help Knight overcome obstacles along the way.

There are a variety of lessons to be learned from this character, but a few that stood out for me were:

 

  • The importance of soundness, which Knight defines as,

“Soundness means having integrity…People who are sound don’t live in contradictions. They’re…internally consistent…It’s being honest with yourself, for sure. Caring enough to seek the truth is part of it” (80-81).

 

  • Listen to your instincts:

“Contrary to common opinion, intuition wasn’t mystical; it was scientific. Intuition was the ability to properly integrate many subtle pieces of information. To have good intuition, therefore, someone needs experience and data and a logical mind that can fuse them into coherence” (17).

 

  • Be truthful:

“Truth never contradicts itself” (81), and, “lying to others is bad enough, but lying to myself is actually worse. I don’t have to live with other people, but I have to live with myself” (92).

 

Xander Winn is an experienced Dutch speculator, who imparts a great deal of wisdom throughout this adventure. Winn’s experiences combined with the fact that he shares similar principles make him the perfect supporting character for Knight, as they struggle to solve the issues that arise and to deal with the consequences of their actions.

For me, the following three themes were most prominent in the wisdom that Winn shares:

 

  • Life lessons:

“Lesson One: to succeed, position yourself to take advantage of luck. Lesson Two: bad luck happens. So plan on bad luck, not good luck” (12).

Winn explains further:

“Luck materializes when preparation meets opportunity” (30).

 

  • Money is important:

“Money is important. It’s not just hunks of metal, pieces of paper, or computer entries. It represents all the time you spend earning it. It represents all the good things you want to have, and do and provide for others. It really represents life itself, in concentrated form”  (25).

 

  • Justification of your actions:

“In your life, make sure to watch how far down that slippery slope of justification you drop, okay? An emotionally laden human brain can justify a whole lot of evil” (257).

 

Speculator can be read on a number of different levels. It’s simultaneously a great adventure story – complete with death, love, and suspense, – a useful guide to speculation, and a philosophical commentary on some of the most important social topics of our world. Read Speculator, and no matter what you take from it, I guarantee you will be entertained.

Become a Junior Stock Review VIP and receive a FREE digital copy of Speculator. Sign up now!

 

Until next time,

Brian